Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball
Prosecution wasn't ready to go to trial, but did it because of publicity of case. Nobody should have suggested prosecuting without knowing how DW got ahold of her and what happened later.

The elected prosecutor needed a boost in the polls to help insure his re-election and pushed too hard for an indictment; counting on DW to waive his right to a speedy trial. It makes no sense for a defendant who is innocent to waive his right to a speedy trial and give the prosecution enough time to 'create' evidence or twist innocent events or facts into 'proof'. If DW committed this crime and is found 'not guilty', and later evidence proves it, the prosecutor's political career will be in ruins.

244 posted on 07/25/2002 11:28:53 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots; Richard Kimball
It makes no sense for a defendant who is innocent to waive his right to a speedy trial...

Especially if he/she is already a prisoner in jail and can't get bail. If they waived there right to a speedy trial they could be sitting there for a year or more.

263 posted on 07/25/2002 11:40:15 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson