Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatima
I can't remember - when were the computer files last accessed? If Westerfield has child porn tapes and he keeps them hidden, then that does hint at a problem.
23 posted on 07/25/2002 2:05:02 AM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: CAPPSMADNESS; ~Kim4VRWC's~; Rheo; shezza; All
If Westerfield has child porn tapes and he keeps them hidden, then that does hint at a problem.

He didn't have child porn tapes.

Some porno CD's were found on DW's bookshelf, one of them had, among 600 meg of porn, the rape scene.

It should be pointed out that Neal has no way of knowing if the CDs he saw are the ones LE "found."

Again, even on the CD, the vast majority was not CP. And it is still not clear that the scene was CP. I haven't seen it, have you? Are we going to just take Nancy Grace's ever-changing word on it?

Again, with a CD full of porn, and only one "questionable" avi, you have to wonder if DW knew it was among the stuff. Neal didn't see it.

I think Feldman wants to throw the case, but come as close to winning as possible. After winning on appeal, in a lawsuit, he will present the orange fiber evidence, the bug evidence, and possibly more evidence (short blue-grey fibers from LE vehicles) to show that LE had good reason to believe that most of the evidence against DW was bogus, but presented it anyway. Means much more to to have beeen found guilty in a railroad than to have been aquitted.

The River chick's testimony is a joke. The fact that the woman's back was hurting is an indicator that she had NOT taken her pain meds. "More" could have been a misunderstanding or "my" or she could have meant more like more since yesterday, when I last took it. Cherokee's Mom's testimony agrees with others and was backed up by credit card records from the resaurant where she ate. Discrediting her doesn't mean much, anyway, other witnesses testified to what she said, she was just more colorful.

I hope Judge Mudd is impeached for the casual way he lets the vaguest, most prejudicial evidence in for the prosecution but refuses to allow defense to examine the crime scene, etc...

I know I may have covered old ground with this post, but I just couldn't make it through the last thread. Out of 1500+ posts, maybe 50 factual posts, the rest banter an flame. Ladies, I used to be so grateful for the blow-by-blow, as I miss most of the testimony at work. Last night I spent most of the evening skimming other people's arguments. I haven't been invited to the chat room, so I don't know if all of the content has moved over there or what.

Kim, I know you have gotten some negative posts directed at you, and they started that thread without pinging you, but I have to say that you are childish to run and tattle, especially since you have done worse in the past yourself. Bottom line, you only object to certain behavior when it is from people who disagree with you.

Anyone: Where do the transcripts get posted? Does anyone know where I can actually get the info from the trial fairly quickly? I would rather just leave the DW persecuters alone on the thread and have time to make a decent supper.

25 posted on 07/25/2002 3:10:58 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
They apparently weren't that hidden because one of the officers stated that them being in an envelope and visible was a red flag. Just like the hose.
29 posted on 07/25/2002 7:11:18 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson