Skip to comments.
Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)
Court TV ^
| July 25, 2002
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 07/24/2002 10:44:59 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
To: ItsOurTimeNow
See #319
To: cyncooper
Or, is it possible that the Van Dams cleaned up after their guests left? Steam cleaner in MB still wet...
Also, bear in mind that the LEO's weren't searching for evidence of the "swingin' six" of that night...only evidence of Westerfield...which they found none.
To: VRWC_minion
see post #322
To: ItsOurTimeNow
Then maybe they inadvertantly cleaned up evidence of DW too, huh?
To: VRWC_minion
No - many of your points are good - that's why you are such a worthy opponent for arguing with - I think there is a possibility that you are correct in your thinking - I just need to hear the expert say it on the stand - then I will weigh it against all the other stuff - I am not locked into a verdict - I have an opinion from what I've heard so far - but I will listen openly to all the rest of the testimony.
325
posted on
07/25/2002 12:20:05 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: connectthedots
If the body was mummified, why were there blow flies, which only like 'fresh meat'. A body that had been at the site for up to two weeks prior to attracting blow flies would hardly qualify as fresh.OK! I really don't know what I am saying but let me try again. The prosecution says her body was there 2/1 or 2/2. I am saying according to the Golf course guy there was a lot of frost (moisture)and maybe watering (I thought he indicated because of all the frost they didn't water) which would cause the body to rot rather than mummify.
Testimony says she had some mummification. Now I am thinking what if she was killed and put there sometime around 2/14-16. The weather was warm enough to begin instant mummification (hands, face) plus be fresh enough for blowflies to start laying eggs in.
Does this make any sense?
326
posted on
07/25/2002 12:21:53 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: redlipstick
I suppose that's possible, that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own.
What about the unidentified prints that LEO's didn't bother to find out whom they belonged to?
To: Spunky
Makes much sense to me.
328
posted on
07/25/2002 12:23:28 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: ItsOurTimeNow
Also, bear in mind that the LEO's weren't searching for evidence of the "swingin' six" of that night...only evidence of Westerfield...which they found none.That is not exactly correct. They did try to do a comparison. Then again, they know they were there----they were not trying to find out IF they were at the house.
To: cyncooper
if Goff is able to testify, will be a very good foundation for that testimony. It appears that Goff will be testifying. After the session ended yesterday a local station went back for a discussion between the lawyers and the judge. Clarke was asking if Goff could testify Friday because he has something scheduled at U of Hawaii Monday that he absolutely has to attend.
Mudd said his own schedule would not allow Friday session. Goff would have to be available for Tuesday.
I bet the current guy's reference to Goff as an expert who has done work on ants eating maggots was "encouraged" by the prosecution.
To: cyncooper
When did they try to do a comparison? I don't recall that coming out in testimony?
To: ItsOurTimeNow
that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own. That is incorrect information. Her prints were on her door. Smudged prints in her room and unidentified found, I believe?
To: cyncooper
Danielle was not allowed to walk across the streetThis statement "of fact" is attributed to BVD and DVD...PROVEN LIARS.
333
posted on
07/25/2002 12:25:43 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: ItsOurTimeNow
And what about the unidentified DNA in her BED!
To: bolthead
Any local scoop on what the consultation between the judge, lawyers and jury was about this morning?
To: demsux
Really? Were there any neighbors that testified to observing Danielle walking by herself around the streets? I don't believe so, and there seemed to be a lot of neighbors who kept their eyes open to neighborhood activity.
To: bolthead
From Goff article I posted yesterday
As the maggot activity peaks, further beetles, ants and wasps arrive, some to join the feast, some to prey on the maggots. Others act as parasites, aiming to use living maggots as incubators for their own offspring. Link
To: ItsOurTimeNow
When did they try to do a comparison? I don't recall that coming out in testimony?There was testimony that their fingerprints weren't found (meaning they looked and didn't find them).
To: VRWC_minion
So when do you think the peak of maggot activity was?
339
posted on
07/25/2002 12:30:23 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: cyncooper
One reporter said that one of the primary jurors was called in for a discussion with the judge and lawyers. Then one of the alternates was called in for a separate discussion. Finally the judge talked to the entire jury. When the session started, the judge said absolutely nothing in explanation.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson