Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)
Court TV ^ | July 25, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 07/24/2002 10:44:59 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
To: ItsOurTimeNow
See #319
321 posted on 07/25/2002 12:18:00 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Or, is it possible that the Van Dams cleaned up after their guests left? Steam cleaner in MB still wet...

Also, bear in mind that the LEO's weren't searching for evidence of the "swingin' six" of that night...only evidence of Westerfield...which they found none.
322 posted on 07/25/2002 12:18:38 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
see post #322
323 posted on 07/25/2002 12:19:12 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Then maybe they inadvertantly cleaned up evidence of DW too, huh?
324 posted on 07/25/2002 12:19:44 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No - many of your points are good - that's why you are such a worthy opponent for arguing with - I think there is a possibility that you are correct in your thinking - I just need to hear the expert say it on the stand - then I will weigh it against all the other stuff - I am not locked into a verdict - I have an opinion from what I've heard so far - but I will listen openly to all the rest of the testimony.
325 posted on 07/25/2002 12:20:05 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
If the body was mummified, why were there blow flies, which only like 'fresh meat'. A body that had been at the site for up to two weeks prior to attracting blow flies would hardly qualify as fresh.

OK! I really don't know what I am saying but let me try again. The prosecution says her body was there 2/1 or 2/2. I am saying according to the Golf course guy there was a lot of frost (moisture)and maybe watering (I thought he indicated because of all the frost they didn't water) which would cause the body to rot rather than mummify.

Testimony says she had some mummification. Now I am thinking what if she was killed and put there sometime around 2/14-16. The weather was warm enough to begin instant mummification (hands, face) plus be fresh enough for blowflies to start laying eggs in.

Does this make any sense?

326 posted on 07/25/2002 12:21:53 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I suppose that's possible, that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own.

What about the unidentified prints that LEO's didn't bother to find out whom they belonged to?
327 posted on 07/25/2002 12:21:54 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Makes much sense to me.
328 posted on 07/25/2002 12:23:28 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Also, bear in mind that the LEO's weren't searching for evidence of the "swingin' six" of that night...only evidence of Westerfield...which they found none.

That is not exactly correct. They did try to do a comparison. Then again, they know they were there----they were not trying to find out IF they were at the house.

329 posted on 07/25/2002 12:23:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
if Goff is able to testify, will be a very good foundation for that testimony.

It appears that Goff will be testifying. After the session ended yesterday a local station went back for a discussion between the lawyers and the judge. Clarke was asking if Goff could testify Friday because he has something scheduled at U of Hawaii Monday that he absolutely has to attend.

Mudd said his own schedule would not allow Friday session. Goff would have to be available for Tuesday.

I bet the current guy's reference to Goff as an expert who has done work on ants eating maggots was "encouraged" by the prosecution.

330 posted on 07/25/2002 12:24:42 PM PDT by bolthead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
When did they try to do a comparison? I don't recall that coming out in testimony?
331 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:05 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own.

That is incorrect information. Her prints were on her door. Smudged prints in her room and unidentified found, I believe?

332 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:31 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Danielle was not allowed to walk across the street

This statement "of fact" is attributed to BVD and DVD...PROVEN LIARS.

333 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:43 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
And what about the unidentified DNA in her BED!
334 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:51 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: bolthead
Any local scoop on what the consultation between the judge, lawyers and jury was about this morning?
335 posted on 07/25/2002 12:27:04 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Really? Were there any neighbors that testified to observing Danielle walking by herself around the streets? I don't believe so, and there seemed to be a lot of neighbors who kept their eyes open to neighborhood activity.
336 posted on 07/25/2002 12:28:30 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: bolthead
From Goff article I posted yesterday

As the maggot activity peaks, further beetles, ants and wasps arrive, some to join the feast, some to prey on the maggots. Others act as parasites, aiming to use living maggots as incubators for their own offspring. Link

337 posted on 07/25/2002 12:28:37 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
When did they try to do a comparison? I don't recall that coming out in testimony?

There was testimony that their fingerprints weren't found (meaning they looked and didn't find them).

338 posted on 07/25/2002 12:29:54 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
So when do you think the peak of maggot activity was?
339 posted on 07/25/2002 12:30:23 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
One reporter said that one of the primary jurors was called in for a discussion with the judge and lawyers. Then one of the alternates was called in for a separate discussion. Finally the judge talked to the entire jury. When the session started, the judge said absolutely nothing in explanation.
340 posted on 07/25/2002 12:31:48 PM PDT by bolthead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,481-1,500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson