Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redlipstick
I suppose that's possible, that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own.

What about the unidentified prints that LEO's didn't bother to find out whom they belonged to?
327 posted on 07/25/2002 12:21:54 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]


To: ItsOurTimeNow
that may explain why there wasn't a SINGLE fingerprint in Danielle's room...not even her own.

That is incorrect information. Her prints were on her door. Smudged prints in her room and unidentified found, I believe?

332 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:31 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
And what about the unidentified DNA in her BED!
334 posted on 07/25/2002 12:25:51 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Right. Also, on CTV today they have shown a few times a clip of Brenda testifying that they checked in all the closets for Danielle. Her closet doors were mirrored. The last question from Feldman to the fingerprint guy, "Were there any fingerprints on the closet doors?" answer-"No"
343 posted on 07/25/2002 12:34:00 PM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson