Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California: Reliant Energy, Reliant Resources shrs plummet
Yahoo -- Reuters ^ | July 24 , 2002 | Reuters

Posted on 07/24/2002 1:25:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

NEW YORK, July 24 (Reuters) - Shares of Reliant Energy Inc. (NYSE:REI - News) and its Reliant Resources Inc. (NYSE:RRI - News) unit, which is under investigation by federal regulators for sham trades, plunged as much as 46 percent in Wednesday trade.

ADVERTISEMENT

The declines come on top of big hits companies in the industry have sustained this week, as cash and credit woes called into question the viability of some of its major players.

The day before, Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN - News) said a downturn in trading and lower power prices forced a cut in its cash flow forecast, increasing fears that the company would face a severe cash crunch and fail. It also postponed a $325 million mortgage bond sale.

At the same time, rating agency Standard & Poor's cut the credit of Williams Cos. (NYSE:WMB - News) to "junk" status. The company said earlier this week it would pursue a secured financing instead of an unsecured financing that would not require any sort of collateral.

Energy trader Reliant Resources on Wednesday fell 32 percent after being down as much as 46 percent earlier in the session and 40 percent since the start of the week.

"There's obviously heightened attention following Williams' announcement that they couldn't roll over their bank facility and following Dynegy's announcement that they couldn't mortgage bonds at Illinois Power," said Paul Fremont, an analyst with Jefferies & Co.

"All of which have major bearing since Reliant Energy's debt all matures on a short-term basis."

The energy trading sector is dealing with the fallout from the bankruptcy late last year of energy trading giant Enron Corp. (Other OTC:ENRNQ.PK - News) and ensuing scandals over sham trades.

Sham or "wash" trades are deals in which a company simultaneously buys and sells electricity or natural gas to the same counterparty. The practice can be used to pump up trading volume and revenue.

The increased scrutiny by investors and credit agencies on the sector has forced companies to shore up finances by issuing equity, selling assets and cutting costs.

Reliant Resources was down $1.45, or 32 percent, to $3.05 in Wednesday afternoon trade on the New York Stock Exchange, after hitting a session low of $2.41.

Shares of Reliant Energy were down $2.20, or almost 28 percent, to $5.70, after falling to as low as $4.36.

They are down nearly 59 percent and almost 60 percent, respectively, since the beginning of the week.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calpowercrisis; government; reliant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2002 1:25:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calpowercrisis; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; quimby; ...
Calpowercrisis:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Calpowercrisis, click below:
  click here >>> Calpowercrisis <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



2 posted on 07/24/2002 1:27:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
How is LTV Steel doing?
3 posted on 07/24/2002 1:27:12 PM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tourist Guy
No idea, do they do energy in California?
4 posted on 07/24/2002 1:31:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No, it's a steel company in the rust belt, and a very poor attempt at a joke (last time shares were traded they were about a dime, I think only a couple of years ago they were about $25 dollars or so...)

Can you say "free fall?"

5 posted on 07/24/2002 1:34:19 PM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Reliant and Enron were accused of some shady trading practices involving Calif. power. Haven't seen anything on it in a month or so.
6 posted on 07/24/2002 1:37:03 PM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Gov Gray Davis has been making wild charges about the said companies getting rich off of California.

However he can't answer how they would go bankrupt if they got rich of California!

7 posted on 07/24/2002 1:44:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
got rich off of California! = got rich of California!

8 posted on 07/24/2002 1:45:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
As Enron showed us, going bankrupt is not always a bad thing. At least for the big boys.
9 posted on 07/24/2002 1:47:07 PM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I have to say that Reliant Energy's stock looks awfully attractive at this price. They have hard assets and millions of customers. Their dividend alone will give you a 19% rate of return on this investment.

I'm very leery of this stock market, but this seems too good to be true.

10 posted on 07/24/2002 2:19:59 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Wouldn't the bond traders normally force a company in trouble to cut its dividend in order to get new funding??
11 posted on 07/24/2002 2:44:06 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yes, but I don't know how much trouble they are really in. I wouldn't touch Reliant Resources with a ten foot pole, but Reliant Energy is not the trading arm that inflated revenues with roundtrip trading.

Reliant and TXU are the only power companies in Texas that still have their rates set by the PUC, and they're going to get them high enough to be profitable; that's a given. This truly looks to me like a stock that has been horribly oversold based on intrinsic value.

Maybe I'm missing something.

12 posted on 07/24/2002 2:55:38 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Good point.

I'd delay a few hours, though.

REI Q2 2002 Financial Release Conference Call
Scheduled to start Thu, Jul 25, 2002, 2:30 pm Eastern

13 posted on 07/24/2002 3:10:52 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Thanks for the tip. It's definitely going on my watch list for tomorrow.
14 posted on 07/24/2002 3:30:06 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I'll give you my 2 cents stock tip.

A good friend of mine, who is wiser than I am, bought Chrysler preferred stock when the federal bailout was taking place for that automaker. His thought was that the company would not be allowed to die and when it finally got out of its jam, it would need to pay off the preferred back dividents so that it could offer dividends to common stock holders. I would say that your comment about Reliant, or PG&E for that matter, would imply that the utility is likely to remain in business and so at some point they should want to pay dividends. If things go to heck in a hand basket the preferred stock holders have first rights on any divident funds available. Just a thought. Not sure if Reliant has suspended common or perferred stock dividents, but I'll bet that PG&E has.

15 posted on 07/24/2002 5:40:52 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Thanks, I'll check into that. I normally don't buy a stock for its dividend because the tax rate on them is higher than for capital gains. But this one is hitting me on the side of the head, trying to get my attention.

Believe it or not, one of my biggest hesitations in buying shares is that I no longer could claim to be a completely neutral observer on the power industry.

16 posted on 07/24/2002 8:18:05 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
However he can't answer how they would go bankrupt if they got rich [off] of California!

They did not get rich off of California. They did, apparently, manipulate the market by moving energy in a non-productive fashion to create shortages and run the prices up dramatically. Unfortunately for their shareholders, the Enron guys made many more bad decisions. The net effect of those other bad decisions was greater than their gains in California. Take all those bad decisions they tried to sweep under the rug in their thousands of bizzare partnerships and stock swaps and you come up with a massive failure of trust. When someone does not trust a trading company, they don't trade with them. So, their business evaporated almost overnight. They were greedy and they believed they were far better at what they did than they actually were.

So, that's how they ripped off California and shortly went bankrupt in a massive corporate-karma backslash.

17 posted on 07/24/2002 8:21:35 PM PDT by ReadMyMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
With dividends, at least you get something that's taxable.

With growth stocks today, you don't need to worry about tax rates because you're not going to have gains 9 out of 10 times.
18 posted on 07/24/2002 8:25:44 PM PDT by ReadMyMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
...neutral observer on the power industry.

I know what you mean. Because I sometimes serve as an expert witness I avoid owning electric utility stocks in anything that might be involved in a physical area where I might serve as a consultant. That has lead me to invest in just a few east coast electric utilities. One of my best investments was in GPU after 3-mile Island. Based on articles that I had read, I felt that the damage was being grossly overstated in the media. I more than doubled my money on that one before I sold it.

19 posted on 07/24/2002 10:57:43 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Reliant and TXU are the only power companies in Texas that still have their rates set by the PUC, and they're going to get them high enough to be profitable; that's a given. ....Well, maybe not.Utilities take rate increase to court
Houston-based Reliant said it is losing $500,000 a day, and Dallas-based TXU said it is losing $700,000 each day.

Maybe I'm missing something.

Like accurate information from the energy frauds?

20 posted on 07/24/2002 11:52:12 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson