To: Howlin
Guess what? A SECOND juror is speaking out about the case. Shouldn't congress hear both of these jurors before casting this vote? Doesn't that make sense?
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Guess what? A SECOND juror is speaking out about the case. Shouldn't congress hear both of these jurors before casting this vote? Doesn't that make sense? No, the Republicans want him out.
75 posted on
07/24/2002 2:03:50 PM PDT by
BJungNan
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Guess what? A SECOND juror is speaking out about the case. Shouldn't congress hear both of these jurors before casting this vote? Doesn't that make sense? The RATS want him out because he doesn't play their BS game. However, I am increasingly believing this entire prosecution and Congressional railroading job is going to blow up in everybody's faces, and Traficant's going to eventually be exonerated, with some of his accusers and their lawyers ending up the ones in jail. Two jurors already saying they were lied to by the prosecution during trial is very, VERY serious.
87 posted on
07/24/2002 2:15:32 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Shouldn't congress hear both of these jurors before casting this vote? Doesn't that make sense? No. Loretta Sanchez MUST have her revenge!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson