[GeneD]

The Greenwich Time story. I posted this account because it had a better headline.

I can see her defense, though. She does work for Celebrity News Network.

[Saundra Duffy]

Prima donna alert.

[Dog Gone]

That's a pretty novel legal excuse. Maybe I should become a celebrity. I hate depositions, and I'm looking for an angle...

[The South Texan]

Can we start a "dumb blonde" ping list?

[dighton]

I see. Even in our so-called enlightened age, a Celebrity-American can be forced to give evidence. That positively reeks of barbarism.

;-)

[denydenydeny]

Lewis said the couple has not paid about $108,000 for services rendered.

Our Paula...she's brainy....she's funny...and just a little bit cheap.

[mhking]

Paula Zahn's lawyer is arguing that the CNN anchor shouldn't have to give a deposition in a lawsuit filed by her landscaper, partly because she's a celebrity.

BWAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

[cake_crumb]

"Paula Zahn's lawyer is arguing that the CNN anchor shouldn't have to give a deposition in a lawsuit filed by her landscaper, partly because she's a celebrity."

So?

[Semper911]

...arguing that Zahn should not be deposed because she has ``celebrity status'' and is unfamiliar with the landscape work, having delegated it to her husband.

Has she never seen her yard? Maybe the limo comes in the back way.

[hattend]

If you were going to do $108K of services for somebody wouldn't you draw up a binding contract? This has to be a no-brainer.

Also, if I was doing $108K worth of landscaping it would be pay as you go. No way would I eat that much and hope to get it back in a lawsuit.

Both parties seem like a couple of numbskulls.

[ozzymandus]

Hey, how come her name ain't Cohen like her husband's?

[skimmilk]

This is ridiculous. How can Zahn use her celebrity status as an excuse? That's so freakin' low.

The stuffed raccoon has a bit more stuffing in the head than I thought.