Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONSERVATIVES TURN ON ASHCROFT
Drudge Report ^ | 07/23/2002 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 07/23/2002 6:07:53 PM PDT by Pokey78

CONSERVATIVES TURN ON ASHCROFT
Tue Jul 23 2002 20:58:38 ET

Many religious conservatives who were instrumental in pressing President Bush to appoint John Ashcroft as attorney general -- now say they have become deeply troubled by his actions, the NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report in a blistering Page One spread on Wednesday.

"His religious base is now quite troubled by what he's done," Grover Norquist tells the TIMES's Neil Lewis.

MORE

Several Bush advisers have begun complaining that Ashcroft has projected himself too often and too forcefully. More significantly, they say privately that he seems to be overstating the evidence of terrorist threats, the paper claims.

Conservtives cite Ashcroft's anti-terrorist positions as enhancing the kind of government power that they instinctively oppose.

Norquist: "If there hadn't been this big government problem, Ashcroft would have been talked about as the Bush successor. Instead, the talk is that 'too bad we pushed for him."'

Ashcroft was also criticized by some in the administration for declaring early on that the case of John Walker Lindh was a major terrorist case, the paper reports. Some officials in the Justice Department believed that the attorney general made needlessly harsh public comments about Lindh. The case came to an abrupt end last week, when Lindh pleaded guilty to two felonies and the department dropped the most severe terrorism-related charges against him, treating him as a far less important figure than depicted by the attorney general.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gnorquist; grovernorquist; norquist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last
To: Pokey78
Ashcroft is doing just fine. The NY Times isn't a fan of conservatism or of America either. Nuff said.
121 posted on 07/23/2002 7:41:05 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Thanks for calling him "KING George", poopsie. I think he'd make a great King, too. I knew you'd come around.
122 posted on 07/23/2002 7:41:44 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Ditto. The louder they scream, the more confident I am that our AG's acting in our nation's best interest. Incorruptible John Ashcroft...the corrupt can't handle him.(^:
123 posted on 07/23/2002 7:44:25 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Of course, you know better..

And there was a story about it here on FR that generated a quite a bit of controversy at the time.

If it's a lie, then fine. If it's not then I think it's a ridiculous use of taxpayer funds.

124 posted on 07/23/2002 7:44:44 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
You may have missed it. Back on September 11, 19 Islamist terrorists flew two jets into the World Trade Center, destroying it and the Pentagon. In the process they killed nearly 3000 Americans.

And yet, we DID NOT declare war. Like it or not, we are not at war. Look it up, if you must.

125 posted on 07/23/2002 7:46:02 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: gunnery
Give us a call when you get "rousted".

PS: are you frightened by "Neighborhood Watch"?

126 posted on 07/23/2002 7:46:33 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Like I said...ever see any covered statues?

It was a media story that was false and yet you were happy to repeat it. Obviously, you want it to be true. You never miss a Bush-trashing thread.

127 posted on 07/23/2002 7:49:30 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; sinkspur
How many conservatives do you know on your block that are angry at Ashcroft because he is traducing civil liberties because he is too eager to bag the bad guys? In fact, have you met anyone in the flesh at all that meets that description? What are folks saying in the mall in Euliss, or at the gambling joint in East Connecticut?
128 posted on 07/23/2002 7:49:44 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Deb
PS: You are correct, there is a conflict here:

Story One

Story 2

129 posted on 07/23/2002 7:50:33 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I said what I think, and that's the truth. I haven't bashed Ashcroft, but he has been a major disappointment.

I had such high hopes early on too.
130 posted on 07/23/2002 7:51:04 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Section 8. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Thats the constitutional authority.

And we have an armed forces for that.

Please show me where in the constitution, the federal government is granted the power to run a federal neighborhood watch program. Yes, it MUST be SPECIFICALLY delagated, or it is NOT a federal power.

131 posted on 07/23/2002 7:51:22 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
A declaration of war is not necessary. The Congress passed a resolution allowing the President to take whatever action he sees fit to stop our enemies.

Are you in the 3rd grade?

132 posted on 07/23/2002 7:51:58 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
All this on Ashcroft seems contrived. I think he isn't paranoid, I think he knows a lot more about the terrorism stuff than we can imagine. And I also wonder if justice is scaring some big libeeral businessmen, maybe indicting a few big dems like Rubin terrifies them. They always use the media to attack when they are close to getting burned. And someone is going to reallly burn over the citigroup, etc., business. Poor Ashcroft, he is gonna feel the heat bigtime.
133 posted on 07/23/2002 7:52:41 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Deb

I never said that.. And, in case you haven't noticed I am on quite a lot of threads giving him kudos also.

Everything from abortion funding, to SDI to his initial position on the ICC.

134 posted on 07/23/2002 7:53:12 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
"More significantly, they say privately that he seems to be overstating the evidence of terrorist threats, the paper claims."

Hmmm....New York Times, The Drudge Report, the main-stream sensational media -- well, well....I think AG Ashcroft UNDERSTATES the danger we are in. Now, time to iron my clothes for tomorrow and take a long, hot shower.

136 posted on 07/23/2002 7:55:01 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
How many conservatives do you know on your block that are angry at Ashcroft because he is traducing civil liberties because he is too eager to bag the bad guys?

Around our neck o' the woods, in places like our mostly conservative oil industry offices, most people are saying things like, "I like Ashcroft, but I don't like all these Big Brother intrusions...," and, "If we give up all this freedom, the terrorists won. They've killed America." Then again, Alaskans are freaks. We like our privacy here in Alaska so much we wrote into our Constitution as a right.

137 posted on 07/23/2002 7:55:45 PM PDT by Anchoragite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Deb
A declaration of war is not necessary.

Bull. Show me where in the constitution it says that.

138 posted on 07/23/2002 7:56:01 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Anchoragite
Just avoid sniffing gasoline during those cold winters. Apparently it is addictive. I didn't know that, but now thanks to FR, I do.
139 posted on 07/23/2002 7:57:13 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson