The implication seems to be that the persons that own Akal or its predecessor company are somehow tied to separatist Sikhs who assassinated Indira Ghandi, and that they are tied to the ISI, and add in those who believe that the explosion at OKC also occurred inside, with the implication that Akal or its predecessor company were involved somehow. Then you have Jayna Davis saying that Iraqis were involved with Timothy McVeigh and OKC. Then you have Nichols and a possible Filipino al Qaeda connection (the latter two could be one and the same). Add in those who toss in donations to Clinton's campaign and a possible Arkancide at OKC, and the current Bush administration who has continued the contracts with the Sikh separatists who own this company that employs former and retired police officers.
So what I can gather is that this was a huge global conspiracy involving, if I can get this straight, the ISI, Sikh separatists who also own a security company that contracts with the US government and employs former and retired police officers, Iraqi agents, Filipino-based al Qaeda members, Bill Clinton and his Justice department, George W. Bush and his Justice department, Let me know if I'm missing anyone.
You are one confused person. You think that one question about Indira Ghandi brought an accusation of AKAL being tied to her assassination?
"Wasn't Indhira Gandhi (sp) machine-gunned to death by her Sikh bodyguards some years back?
11 posted on 7/22/02 4:17 PM Central by PLMerite