To: Catspaw
"The implication seems to be that the persons that own Akal or its predecessor company are somehow tied to separatist Sikhs who assassinated Indira Ghandi,"
87 posted on 7/23/02 10:56 AM Central by CatspawYou are one confused person. You think that one question about Indira Ghandi brought an accusation of AKAL being tied to her assassination?
"Wasn't Indhira Gandhi (sp) machine-gunned to death by her Sikh bodyguards some years back?
11 posted on 7/22/02 4:17 PM Central by PLMerite
89 posted on
07/23/2002 9:17:58 AM PDT by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
No, I'm not confused. I want to know if Akal is tied to or as the same as the Sikh separatists who murdered Indira Ghandi. Or are you saying that because they are Sikh, they are inherently tied to Sikh separatists?
91 posted on
07/23/2002 9:38:52 AM PDT by
Catspaw
To: rdavis84
And one more question: how does Rep. Dan Burton's support of Sikhs tie into this mix? It'd seem that he'd be on the opposite side of a Clinton conspiracy in his mix, yet his support of Sikhs has been very strong for quite some time. Has Burton been duped?
92 posted on
07/23/2002 9:50:43 AM PDT by
Catspaw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson