Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clear and present anger
Daily Herald | 7-19-02 | JOEL REESE

Posted on 07/19/2002 7:48:09 AM PDT by Temple Owl

July 19, 2002

Clear and present anger

BY JOEL REESE Daily Herald Staff Writer

Posted on July 18, 2002

Thirty minutes with a surly Harrison Ford

Harrison Ford is not happy to see us.

We are six Chicago-area journalists who are about to have an audience with one of the world's biggest movie stars.

We are sitting in a business suite in the Ritz-Carlton, awaiting Ford's entrance.

Harrison Ford, well - he needs no introduction. He's Han Solo, he's Indiana Jones, he's Jack Ryan.

And now he's here. A door opens and it's Harrison Ford, the ruggedly handsome mega-icon who beats the bad guys, seduces the ladies and saves the day - all with his famously scarred chin and trademark roguish charm.

That charm is not evident today, however. Our anticipation to meet him quickly fades as he marches purposefully into the room with his head down.

Ford wears a navy polo shirt and sunglasses, although we are sitting in a dim room inside - and even if we weren't, it's cloudy outside.

But hey, he's the movie star.

Ford takes off his glasses, sits down at the head of the table and grumbles a terse, barely audible, "Hello." Apparently, this means, "Let's begin this torture session."

I ask him a question that refers to one of his previous films. Just as I'm about to name it, though, the title vanishes from my mind. It is simply gone.

I start snapping my fingers as I try to remember it. "When you were in ... snap snap snap ... that film ..."

Ford looks at me tiredly and snaps his fingers. Snap snap snap.

Flustered, I say, "You know, that Michelle Pfeiffer movie ..."

He smirks and doesn't volunteer the title. "Let's just leave it that way - 'That Michelle Pfeiffer movie,'æ" he says.

So much for my question. The title, incidentally, was "What Lies Beneath."

Ford mentions that he spent some time in Moscow, doing some research for his upcoming role as a Russian submarine leader.

"Define 'research in the Soviet Union,'æ" says John Landecker of WJMK 104.3-FM. "What did you do there?"

"It's the same as research anyplace else," Ford says wearily. "You go and meet the people involved and talk to them and get a sense of how they felt about what they had gone through."

Landecker follows, "The families of the survivors?"

"No, not the families," Ford says testily. "The actual survivors of the members of the crew of K-19."

Apparently Ford isn't familiar with the phrase, "The only dumb question is the one you don't ask."

Publicity wheels turn

Ironically, we are facing Ford's churlishness because we're helping him publicize his upcoming movie.

Here's how the Hollywood publicity machine works: A star makes a movie. Then he or she embarks on a tour to promote it, which means talking to the press.

This is why people like Ford and Julia Roberts and Brad Pitt appear on "The Late Show with David Letterman" and "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno."

Stars don't appear on these shows for fun; they go because they want people to see their upcoming films. After all, the bigger the audience, the bigger the paycheck.

And so, essentially, we are helping Ford get richer while he slowly reduces us to the size of tsetse flies.

Next up to face the humiliation firing squad is J. Love, a producer for Mancow's show on WKQX (101.1-FM).

"Have you seen the film?" Love asks him about the film Ford is currently publicizing.

Ford stares at him with mock incredulity, as if Love just asked him, "Do you wear shoes on your feet?"

Silence. Ford seems too astonished to speak.

"I didn't know if you'd seen the film yet," Love says.

"Yeah, yeah, yeah - I'm executive producer. How do you think - yes, many times," Ford says. He doesn't actually close with, "you moron," but it's implied.

The thing is, Love's question is perfectly reasonable. Tom Hanks hadn't seen "Road to Perdition" prior to the recent Chicago screening, and it's pretty common for stars not to see the final cut of a film before it's released.

Ford seems almost angry with us for not knowing the internal machinations of the Hollywood film-release process.

Soon, he has belittled everyone in the room. It's like a rite of passage: We ask our questions, he replies with curt answers that would have been as insightful if he gave them in Swahili.

Ford is asked, over the course of his career, which of his roles is his favorite.

"I really don't have favorites," he says.

"Are they kind of like your children?" Love interjects.

Ford looks at Love with barely concealed disgust, sighs, then says, "I have said before, and you're forcing me to say again, that they're like your kids. You don't choose which is your favorite kid. It's really for the audience to judge. I don't have favorites."

The room is becoming quieter. No one wants to speak, lest he face the disgrace of asking a bad question.

And Ford certainly isn't rushing to fill the dead air. If he were any more subdued, we would have to get a defibrillator and shock him back to life.

Go away, pests

Ford seems to see us as pesky moths circling the blinding light of his fame.

But since we are part of the publicity machine, and he wants many people to see his movie, he must give us his time.

And of course, we might have asked an eye-roller question or two. But there are only so many new questions you can ask a star who's been interviewed a couple of million times before.

So you'd think he'd give us a little bit of a break here. After all, Ford is from the Chicago area. He grew up in Park Ridge and went to Maine Township High School, now Maine East.

We are, theoretically, his homies.

Instead, he gives us platitudes about Chicago like, "I really like the city - I like the people, I like the scale, I like the proximity to the lake." He says he misses Chicago hot dogs.

Whoa, stop the presses.

Ford is getting paid $25 million (plus 20 percent of the gross box office) for a role that was shot over 20 days - a new record for Hollywood fiscal insanity. That means Ford initially received about $156,000 an hour, if he worked an eight-hour day.

Even a waitress at the local greasy spoon usually manages a smile, and she's lucky to make eight bucks an hour, not $156,000.

Given the amount of cash he's receiving, you'd think Ford would muster up some graciousness for this roundtable interview.

Or at least fake it. Act. He could look at it as part of his job, to promote this film.

"You have a place in Jackson Hole, Wyo.," asks Kathy Hart, Arlington Heights resident and disc jockey for WTMX. "How many acres?"

"A few," he says.

Silence.

Finally, it ends. The publicist comes in and tells us Ford's 30 minutes of torture are finished.

He gets up, puts his sunglasses back on and strides out.

We collect our meager belongings and silently follow Ford out of the room. We head down the elevator and out onto the busy street, far below his air-conditioned suite.

Incidentally, his next movie is called "K-19: The Widowmaker." It opens Friday.

There's your publicity, Mr. Ford.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: harrisonford; publicity; surly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Another victory for a Hollywood left-winger. What upsets me is that a lot of people confuse this clown with Charlton Heston.
1 posted on 07/19/2002 7:48:09 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
If he wanted publicity, he got it.A nice withering piece on how to play an ingrate.The author is so correct, in that the least he could have done, was fake being interested in promoting his work.And as executive producer, you'd think that Ford would know this better than the actors involved.
2 posted on 07/19/2002 7:56:31 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
While reading this, I got the very satisfying feeling that Hollyweird actors and the media somehow deserve each other.
3 posted on 07/19/2002 8:01:41 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Well I for one am quite surprised that at least one reported from the media reported the events as they actually happened. I bet the other five reporters covered it in an upbeat positive manner, gushing adoration for Harrison everywhere.
4 posted on 07/19/2002 8:02:57 AM PDT by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Thanks for posting that. I really enjoyed reading it. BTW, I've always loved his movies, but I'm not familiar with Harrison Ford's politics. I'm trying to learn more about actor's and director's politics before deciding to see their movies these days. Several months ago I saw Gosford Park --which was incredibly boring-- before I found out that Robert Altman hates America. Never would have paid the $8.75 to see it if I had know that before hand.
5 posted on 07/19/2002 8:04:30 AM PDT by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
This makes me sad. I actually like Mr. Ford, at least as an actor. I wonder if somebody just ran over his cat or something? His state of mind at the time seemed pretty horrible. Surely he would've otherwise known his attitude would play poorly in the press?
6 posted on 07/19/2002 8:05:31 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Another article to re-affirm that most of Hollywood is composed of oafish boors with little insight or intellect. Since having a functioning brain isn’t a requisite to stand in front of a camera and say lines with inflection, intelligence and a Hollywood type rarely coincide.

The rare Heston, Woods, (or certainly Reagan) is a breath of fresh air, but again, they’re all too rare…

Yet another reason to rely on books for entertainment.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

7 posted on 07/19/2002 8:06:47 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Kudos to Mr. Reese for nailing Ford in this piece.

I'm one of the few people, it seems, that don't mind that movie stars, ball players, and other entertainers make millions. However, I do get perturbed when they lament the "rigors" of their professions.

For the most part, these people work about 6 months out of the year, and can do whatever they please the other half. To say that a shoot was "grueling", or that a long road trip is especially hard on the home life is insulting to a lot of people who really do work hard, and away from home.

8 posted on 07/19/2002 8:07:45 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
On the other side of the coin:

You have to realize how many times he's been interviewed for the same movie, and how many times he's been asked the same questions over and over again. It gets tiring after a while.

I used to manage a local semi-famous band a number of years ago. Nearly every single time the band played anywhere, there was some college reporter there to ask the same tired, hackneyed questions over and over.

I despise nearly all forms of media, and supposed news-people. In most cases, they deserve to feel like pesky moths.
9 posted on 07/19/2002 8:08:21 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Yeah, I've read lots of other interviews with him regarding this movie, and he seemed genuinely charming. So who knows, maybe he was just in a bad mood, which granted is hard to justify, seeing as he's a professional and promoting his latest work is part and parcel. So you'd think he'd at least make an effort to be affable, no matter what his mood. I guess he's just human like the rest of us.
10 posted on 07/19/2002 8:11:36 AM PDT by SoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GnL
I'm with you. A pox on both their houses.

Granted, Ford was doing the "publicity thing," and could've been more accommodating.

On the other hand, these grubby press hacks don't get a pass from doing basic homework in advance of the interview (snap-snap-snap "When you did that one movie with Michelle Pfeiffer...") just because they're doing a publicity piece.

The author says "the only stupid question is the one that doesn't get asked." He obviously didn't catch the David Gregory questioning of Pres. Bush in France.

11 posted on 07/19/2002 8:11:42 AM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
But you were seeking publicity and fame and fortune for you local semi-famous band. Hopefully, you kept your feelings to yourself and displayed better manners than did Mr. Ford.
12 posted on 07/19/2002 8:13:56 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
To be a little fair, let me say that I've seen some of the theatre entertainment industry up close, and there is some pretty hard work to be had. From the stage hands to the actors, to the producer/directors.

While it's not always the case, the work is sometimes "grueling" in terms of working hours and being taxed emotionally. Am I saying it's an excuse for boorishness? Nope. The big actors still make huge buckets of money for what they do, so they're compensated. Grin and bear it, that sort of thing.

What I am saying is that, bad attitude notwithstanding, when an actor says he's been working hard, it's probably true.
13 posted on 07/19/2002 8:14:47 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
If he wanted publicity, he got it. A nice withering piece on how to play an ingrate.

He's got the ingrate part down pat. He's also got the liberal idiot part down pat too.

Maybe Harrison Ford, Alec Baldwin, and Tom Cruise should form a club. They could bring in Barbara Streisand for balance, and all move away. Somewhere with warm beaches, like Saudia Arabia.

14 posted on 07/19/2002 8:17:39 AM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
I used to be a big fan, but his surliness during televised interviews has gotten to me. And lately, his performances have done less than dazzle me. He's monotone, mumbles, and moves through a role like a zombie. I think he's supposed to be mysterious and intriguing. But he just plays flat and boring to me. As a matter of fact, most of my old heart flames have lost their sizzle. They must all be getting old...sigh. :)
15 posted on 07/19/2002 8:18:54 AM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Ford has one movie a year, and promotes it for a grand total of maybe....2 wks tops.It goes with the job, and being the ex producer, well, he has to do more.I don't think he goes into it with his eyes closed,so he has to endure the vapid questions of bored, maybe even star struck, reporters.Well, maybe they have to endure the bored, vapid responses of bimbo actors.

They both seem to deserve each other ;-)
16 posted on 07/19/2002 8:22:54 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Why is this reporter so shocked that this bigshot Clinton pal is rude to them? Of course he's rude, he lives in his own self-serving little leftist world, where you don't have to be polite because you just don't feel like it. He now has the perfect movie part for him. A commie sub captain. It shouldn't be too much of a stretch.
17 posted on 07/19/2002 8:25:47 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
when an actor says he's been working hard, it's probably true

Oh, I agree. There's plenty of misery documented in filming such features as Apocalypse Now, Star Wars, Saving Private Ryan, etc. Hell, Vic Morrow DIED during the Twilight Zone shoot. The big however, however, is that it is not a day in, day out process for them. It's a concentrated misery, unlike the day-to-day drudgery of many a blue collar worker. I just think they should choose their words carefully when complaining about the circumstances.

18 posted on 07/19/2002 8:26:42 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Wow, what a post, Owl. Blow by blow, in-the-room type stuff. I love it.
19 posted on 07/19/2002 8:31:49 AM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Like I said: It's no excuse for a bad attitude.

However, remember that all the overnight successes out there took years to achieve. Many actors take pretty "blue-collar" jobs to get by while looking for opportunities to do what they want to do. Often, they know all sort of things about "drudgery" and hard work. Sacrifice, too. And when they work 80-hour weeks for half the year trying to get something done, it isn't all wine and roses.

What's annoying though, is when one of these yutzes acts badly, like they're a martyr or something. They forget that there a lot of folks in the world that would (and do) kill to have the chance to work as hard as they sometimes do. Thespians need need to keep this in mind when they get weary of the press' idiocy. (and those Chicago reporters were asking daffy crap, you've got to admit...)
20 posted on 07/19/2002 8:36:49 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson