Big names allege abortion foe exploits their tags

Mpls (red)Star Tribune ^ | 7/19/02 | Chuck Haga

[Valin]

Several of the nation's highest-profile corporations sued a South St. Paul man in federal court Thursday, alleging that he is a "cyber squatter" exploiting their famous or distinctive trademarks to promote his views against abortion.

A second lawsuit, also filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, by the Minneapolis School District makes a similar complaint against a New York man.

[Khepera]

What about whitehouse.com or hundreds of like sites why not go after them? Why just this issue?

[yendu bwam]

Good going for a man who wants to convince others to stop the bloody murder of the unborn. When in our country we can puncture the head of a healthy infant two seconds before its birth, and think we have no evil in our hearts in so doing, we have become intrinsically evil ourselves.

[Valin]

Why? Because it's about a womans "right" to kill a human being,
I mean a womans right to choose and to control her body.

[Khepera]

We have the death penalty for people who kill. I support that. Bring this killers to trial.

[buffyt]

Excellent idea! I have a liberal friend here who is pro choice. I will show her these photos of murdered innocents. I wasn't against early abortion until I saw similar photos. Now I say killing a child before birth is same as killing a child after its birth is the same thing. No difference between abortion a baby and killing your 18 year old son. In my opinion. Unless the mother and baby would die if pregnancy continues, as in tubal pregnancy, I am against abortion! My sister tried for years to have a baby, but two pregnancies ended in abortion only because both times the baby was stuck in the fallopian tubes. Each time she also lost a tube, when they took the baby, to save her life. Now she can't have a baby. She wanted one VERY much!