Skip to comments.
Judge upholds ruling that pregnancy tests aren't confidential, orders release to investigators
Associated Press ^
| 7-18-02
| EMILY GERSEMA
Posted on 07/18/2002 7:38:27 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) --
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: confidential; court; plannedparenthood; pregnancy; tests
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"...District Judge Frank B. Nelson ordered on Monday.
"Astonishingly, PPGI apparently considers itself and its personnel to be above the law..."
Prayers for this brave judge - he knows what is ahead of him for going against the wishes of "Planned Parenthood".
Could the tide be turning in our battle to protect the most precious and defensless of God's creations?
2
posted on
07/18/2002 7:46:33 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Astonishingly, PPGI apparently considers itself and its personnel to be above the law and not required to respond to a valid issued and served subpoena," Separation of church and state. Satanic priests offering souls not yet born into sin on the abortion alters.
Obey the law? BWAahahahah. Only their Satan is king!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Astonishingly, PPGI apparently considers itself and its personnel to be above the law and not required to respond to a valid issued and served subpoena," Nelson wrote. Planned Parenthood will appeal the decision to the Iowa Supreme Court, said Jill June, president of the Greater Iowa chapter. June has said she's willing to go to jail to protect the records.
So not only do they make an effort to conceal the identities of victims of statutory rape and the perpetrators, but also of people who toss dead humans into dumpsters.
Oh wait, they do that every day themselves, don't they?
4
posted on
07/18/2002 7:49:24 AM PDT
by
mvpel
To: mvpel
So not only do they make an effort to conceal the identities of victims of statutory rape and the perpetrators, but also of people who toss dead humans into dumpsters. You can tell how a society views life by watching how they treat their dead.
To: mvpel; scripter
6
posted on
07/18/2002 7:57:55 AM PDT
by
EdReform
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let's see. Planned Parenthood makes its money by slaughtering infants in the womb. In some states it's even legal to do so in the third trimester, and via "partial birth abortion."
Is anyone surprised that they would place a much higher priority on their "confidential records" than they would the life of a child who was murdered?
I mean, that's like asking the SS to protect the rights of a Jew who somehow survived the gas chamber.
7
posted on
07/18/2002 8:07:13 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Oldeconomybuyer
BTTT in memory of the innocent babe.
To: Psalm 73
Pro-life group Birthright has backed PP on this matter, and said they also would not hand over such records. This is a giant fishing expedition by nosy government agents. There is no indication that the mother in question ever visited PP.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is weird. Sounds like a major fishing expedition. I wonder what makes the government think that the mom has a pregnancy test on record, particularly at Planned Parenthood.
Investigators say the records would help them find the mother of a baby...
How exactly are these records going to help? Are they going to do DNA samples on everyone, or what? Maybe they already have a suspect in mind.
10
posted on
07/20/2002 9:04:16 PM PDT
by
Sandy
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson