Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAE, Jordan oppose US strike on Iraq
The Times of India ^ | July 17 2002 | AFP

Posted on 07/17/2002 2:15:13 PM PDT by knighthawk

ABU DHABI: The United Arab Emirates and Jordan said on Wednesday they opposed a US military strike on Iraq but urged Baghdad to comply with relevant UN resolutions, the official Emirati news agency WAM reported.

During talks here, Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan and Jordan's King Abdullah II voiced "opposition to a military strike on Iraq, which would have grave repercussions not only in that country but also on regional security and stability," WAM said.

"At the same time, they urged Iraq to implement UN resolutions in order to spare its people further suffering" caused by UN sanctions in force for the past 12 years.

Iraq faces the threat of a US attack aimed at toppling President Saddam Hussein, whom Washington accuses of developing weapons of mass destruction.

The Jordanian monarch arrived in Abu Dhabi Wednesday from Oman, which also called for a peaceful settlement in Iraq.

"It would be preferable to continue the dialogue between Iraq and the United Nations," said Omani Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Yussef bin Alawi bin Abdullah, quoted by the official ONA news agency.

Sheikh Khalifa and King Abdullah II also discussed the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, expressing support for the Palestinian people's recovery of "their legitimate right to an independent state, with Jerusalem as its capital, on the basis of UN resolutions," WAM said.

UAE President Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahayan is currently on a private visit to Geneva.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; jordan; uae; usstrikes
Bahrain Opposed to U.S. Attack on Iraq
Qatar in dilemma over U.S. threat to Iraq
Kuwait Says It won't Serve as Launch Pad for U.S. Attack on Iraq
Arab States Oppose U.S. Attack on Iraq, Mussa
1 posted on 07/17/2002 2:15:13 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/17/2002 2:15:34 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I'm ok with letting Saddam gas his "Arab Brothers" first. You would have thought the invasion of Kuwait would have made believers of them...
3 posted on 07/17/2002 2:18:49 PM PDT by Skwidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Pre-Launch rhetoric to calm the muslim masses in their countries.
4 posted on 07/17/2002 2:22:34 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
I agree.
Everybody is either going one way or the other - it would be impossible to detect a pattern.
Unless, it is the relentless number of new bases the US has spotted about the area.
5 posted on 07/17/2002 2:34:44 PM PDT by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Skwidd
Me to. Let Saddam do some rampage. We can always rescue them later, when we feel more like it.
6 posted on 07/17/2002 3:11:13 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson