Witness Tampering Alleged in Flt. 587 Probe

NewsMax.com ^ | 7/16/02 | Carl Limbacher & Staff

[goody2shooz]

Move along, folks. Nothing to see here

...and the coverup continues.

[Sabertooth]

Deja vu.

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

You forgot the second part, "Clearly an isolated incident." "Totally unrelated".

[Sabertooth]

Hey, can we get this placed in Extended News or Front Page News?

This is a pretty significant story, and merits wider attention. Thanks.

[Map Kernow]

A group of eyewitnesses to the Nov. 12 crash of American Airlines Flight 587 are charging that the National Transportation Safety Board has engaged in deliberate cover-up; complaining that investigators have ignored their accounts of a fiery midair explosion and even tried to persuade some of them to change their story.

Naah, they're just being prepared by "experts" who know what they really saw. [/sarcasm]

The government lies to us more than we'll ever know, especially about "national security" matters, regardless of who's in the White House.

[Samwise]

Deja vu.

All over again. Bump.

[Askel5]

You should see if someone can't link up the ATC tape wherein pilots who had visual contact reported a cloud of smoke mid-air.

[RobRoy]

This isn't a coverup. It is clear that these "non-expert" witnesses just don't always know how to interpret what they are actually seeing. The Flight 800 crash was rife with the same type of "eyewitness" accounts.

With that crash people thought they saw a missle rising up to the plane when what they were really seeing was the plane itself rising after the nose came off.

Likewise, in thig case they did, in fact see the plane engulfed in a fireball, but that is because they saw it AFTER it hit the ground and then bounced high in the air, making it look like it caught on fire before it ever hit the ground.

I'm sure the FBI can do one of those computer simulation thingies that makes it look really real.

Few casual observers ever take into acount what investigators call the BM, or "Bounce Factor."

[Sabertooth]

You should see if someone can't link up the ATC tape wherein pilots who had visual contact reported a cloud of smoke mid-air.

Hey Race, you were active on the Flight #587 threads... do you have a lead on the tape to which Askel5's referring?

[RobRoy]

Oops. Two things: BM = BF
and < /sarcasm >

[zarf]

Another BS article from NEWMAX......file this in the tin foil drawer....

[Shermy]

It was wind shear. I know, kooky, but when combined with an onboard explosion it could happen...or look like it could of happened that way, with a selective analysis of evidence.

[MeekOneGOP]

All over again. Bump.

LOL! Ya beat me to it!

[Alberta's Child]

TWA Flight 800 (apparently shot down off the south shore of Long Island)
Egypt Air (suicidal pilot or co-pilot)
SwissAir (crashed off the coast of Newfoundland)
American Airlines Flight 587 (explosion, or tail simply fell off)

Every one of these disasters involved a commercial jet flying out of New York's JFK International Airport and crashing under unknown or unusual circumstances. In some cases, the explanation was even more bizarre than the most far-fetched allegation that was ever made.

I can't imagine why anyone would be willing to fly out of JFK Airport these days.

[SpottedBeaver]

It was wind shear. I know, kooky, but when combined with an onboard explosion it could happen...or look like it could of happened that way, with a selective analysis of evidence.

And you know, the strange thing about how the plane fell out sky... It wasn't an onboard explosion... It was when the wings fell off, after the onboard explosion.

[Ferris]

It was the center wing fuel tank...

Always trust your government...

For your government is always right...

[Sundog]

The eye witnesses to 587 saw an explosion at the base of the starboard wing first, then the plane went down. I listened to one of them describe exactly what she saw, to the reporter, moments after she saw it, and it was precise, clear and immediate. She had been staring at the plane fly and saw it happen.

My flight 93 web site has disappeared, www.flight93crash.com. It had quite a bit of circumstantial evidence that Todd Beamer wasn't the only one bringing the flight down.

Funny, just like the witnesses who saw a missle go up before flight 800 came down, they were collectively told what to think and where to go.

Cheers.

[MeekOneGOP]

Thanks, I was wondering about the BM thingy there, hehehe

[gunshy]

Why do you people continue with this effort to get the government to admit the truth. There is no provision in the constitution requiring the government to be truthful. All you are doing is creating a diversion to keep the government from its main job of oppressing the people. You should all be ashamed.

[Free the USA]

Index Bump