Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House OKs life sentences for hackers
CNET News.com ^ | July 15, 2002 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:15 PM PDT by trussell

House OKs life sentences for hackers

By Declan McCullagh Staff Writer, CNET News.com July 15, 2002, 6:00 PM PT

WASHINGTON--The House of Representatives on Monday overwhelmingly approved a bill that would allow for life prison sentences for malicious computer hackers. By a 385-3 vote, the House approved a computer crime bill that also expands police ability to conduct Internet or telephone eavesdropping without first obtaining a court order.

The Bush administration had asked Congress to approve the Cyber Security Enhancement Act (CSEA) as a way of responding to electronic intrusions, denial of service attacks and the threat of "cyber-terrorism." The CSEA had been written before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks last year, but the events spurred legislators toward Monday evening's near-unanimous vote.

CSEA, the most wide-ranging computer crime bill to make its way through Congress in years, now heads to the Senate. It's not expected to encounter any serious opposition, although there's not much time for senators to consider the measure because they take August off and are expected to head home for the year around Oct. 1.

"Until we secure our cyber infrastructure, a few keystrokes and an Internet connection is all one needs to disable the economy and endanger lives," sponsor Lamar Smith, R-Tex., said earlier this year. "A mouse can be just as dangerous as a bullet or a bomb."

Smith heads a subcommittee on crime, which held hearings that drew endorsements of CSEA from a top Justice Department official and executives from Microsoft and WorldCom. Citing privacy concerns, civil liberties groups have objected to portions of CSEA.

At the urging of the Justice Department, Smith's subcommittee voted in February to rewrite CSEA. It now promises life terms for computer intrusions that "recklessly" put others' lives at risk.

A committee report accompanying the legislation predicts: "A terrorist or criminal cyber attack could further harm our economy and critical infrastructure. It is imperative that the penalties and law enforcement capabilities are adequate to prevent and deter such attacks."

By rewriting wiretap laws, CSEA would allow limited surveillance without a court order when there is an "ongoing attack" on an Internet-connected computer or "an immediate threat to a national security interest." That kind of surveillance would, however, be limited to obtaining a suspect's telephone number, IP address, URLs or e-mail header information--not the contents of online communications or telephone calls.

Under federal law, such taps can take place when there's a threat of "serious bodily injury to any person" or activity involving organized crime.

Another section of CSEA would permit Internet providers to disclose the contents of e-mail messages and other electronic records to police in cases involving serious crimes.

Currently it's illegal for an Internet provider to "knowingly divulge" what users do except in some specific circumstances, such as when it's troubleshooting glitches, receiving a court order or tipping off police that a crime is in progress. CSEA expands that list to include when "an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires disclosure of the information without delay."

Clint Smith, the president of the U.S. Internet Service Providers Association, endorsed the concept earlier this year.

Smith testified that CSEA builds on the controversial USA Patriot act, which Congress enacted last fall. He said that this portion of CSEA "will reduce impediments to ISP cooperation with law enforcement."

The Free Congress Foundation, which opposes CSEA, criticized Monday evening's vote.

"Congress should stop chipping away at our civil liberties," said Brad Jansen, an analyst at the conservative group. "A good place to start would be to substantially revise (CSEA) to increase, not diminish, oversight and accountability by the government."

If the Senate also approves CSEA, the new law would also:

• Require the U.S. Sentencing Commission to revise sentencing guidelines for computer crimes. The commission would consider whether the offense involved a government computer, the "level of sophistication" shown and whether the person acted maliciously.

• Formalize the existence of the National Infrastructure Protection Center. The center, which investigates and responds to both physical and virtual threats and attacks on America's critical infrastructure, was created in 1998 by the Department of Justice, but has not been authorized by an act of Congress. The original version of CSEA set aside $57.5 million for the NIPC; the final version increases the NIPC's funding to $125 million for the 2003 fiscal year.

• Specify that an existing ban on the "advertisement" of any device that is used primarily for surreptitious electronic surveillance applies to online ads. The prohibition now covers only a "newspaper, magazine, handbill or other publication."

Most industry associations, including the Business Software Alliance, the Association for Competitive Technology, the Information Technology Association of America, and the Information Technology Industry Council, have endorsed most portions of CSEA.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: computercrimebill; computersecurityin; cruelandunusual; donotcollect200; fascistcheerleader; godirectlytojail; gotojail; hackers; lifesentences; moveabyte; policestateidiots; prison
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

COOL


1 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:16 PM PDT by trussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sleavelessinseattle; kayak; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/15/2002 7:26:40 PM PDT by trussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trussell
They left out spammers. I think they deserve drawing and quartering.
3 posted on 07/15/2002 7:26:46 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Me too! Do you think we will ever be that lucky?
4 posted on 07/15/2002 7:35:14 PM PDT by trussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trussell
" By a 385-3 vote, the House approved a computer crime bill that also expands police ability to conduct Internet or telephone eavesdropping without first obtaining a court order. "

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Does anyone here feel that this vote doesn't violate this Amendment?....And if in support of this vote, please explain what I am not seeing?....
5 posted on 07/15/2002 7:36:21 PM PDT by JustSayNoNWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoNWO
Don't you understand the Constitution is a "living" document.
6 posted on 07/15/2002 7:45:18 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoNWO
It's okay. It's Republican. Have some koolaid.
7 posted on 07/15/2002 7:47:22 PM PDT by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
" Don't you understand the Constitution is a "living" document. "

If those still "living" were around to change it before it became the Law of The Land...ok then...nuff said?
8 posted on 07/15/2002 7:49:19 PM PDT by JustSayNoNWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ragin1
" It's okay. It's Republican. Have some koolaid. "

So was CFR, Giving Speeches in Spanish as well as English(on this soil), Giving a year to consider the ICC...etc..

Kool-aid ain't fixin nothing.....unless it's spiked.
9 posted on 07/15/2002 7:52:38 PM PDT by JustSayNoNWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Complacent Sheeple
bump
10 posted on 07/15/2002 7:52:42 PM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trussell
FINALLY!!!!
11 posted on 07/15/2002 7:54:07 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trussell
when murderers and rapists get out in a few years, this makes no sense. Hacking is hardly a crime worthy of a life sentence, unless it directly leads to loss of life.
12 posted on 07/15/2002 7:55:01 PM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Yep; thank you.
13 posted on 07/15/2002 7:56:58 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trussell
First the cynically named "Patriot Act" then "Citizen Spies" now this.

I miss America.
14 posted on 07/15/2002 8:03:14 PM PDT by LanaTurnerOverdrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
Welcome to the NWO, and the neo-cons are as much to blame as the LibDems.
15 posted on 07/15/2002 8:04:51 PM PDT by Phillip Augustus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trussell
Computer hacking is now a worse crime than joining the Taliban and fighting against your own country. Yup, that makes sense.
16 posted on 07/15/2002 8:05:50 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Hacking is hardly a crime worthy of a life sentence, unless it directly leads to loss of life.

Can't wait until you're the victim of identity theft; you lose tens of thousands of $$$; and your credit is ruined. You'll probably want the perp to be given the death penalty....

17 posted on 07/15/2002 8:06:40 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
when murderers and rapists get out in a few years, this makes no sense

I do agree with this part of your post.

18 posted on 07/15/2002 8:07:48 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
Citizen spies, I think not. After all, the program has a cute name.

</sarcasm>


T. I. P. S.

Towards

Implementing a

Police

State


19 posted on 07/15/2002 8:08:31 PM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
when murderers and rapists get out in a few years, this makes no sense

I do agree with this part of your post.

20 posted on 07/15/2002 8:09:07 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson