Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The DOW Bomb....Down 322.180
071502 | Sams Bees

Posted on 07/15/2002 10:55:40 AM PDT by SamBees

The DOW is in a nose dive, and for no reason. Economic indicators are up. The economy is improving, but faith in the future of business has been affected by the many "Enron's" in the news.

Fear is in full control of Wall Street, but what is it that investors fear? Since the economy is moving up, what are they worried about?

Is this drop in the DOW representative of their fear of possible terrorism? Or, could it be a fear of more giant corporations collapsing from the Enron Syndrome? (coined by SamBees)

OR, better yet, could it be that investors are watching each other, and are duplicating each other in a spiral into the trash can? That could create a situation like a feeding frenzy among sharks where there is not logic involved, just a fearful frenzy of selling that results in a vitural collapse of the DOW.

Some of us are waiting in the weeds for the bottom to be hit. There are many billions of dollars to be invested, and once confidence returns, the DOW will take off like a Saturn rocket to the moon!

Is it time for GW to step forward with a confidence building speech regarding the state of the nation, and the ecnomy?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dow; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2002 10:55:40 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SamBees
There are several reasons.

Belief that corporations are lying in their financial statements.

Lack of confidence in the Administration to punish corporate wrongdoers.

Belief that Congress will try to blame people without any real progress on problems.

Repressive taxation and regulatory policies.

Tariff war starting up, already leading to steel price increases (and chicken price drops.)

Uncertainty about corporate ties of Bush and Cheney and what these mean.

Fear of terrorism and fear of the actions taken to fight terrorism.

Ordinary panic. Sell now on fear of more drops later.
2 posted on 07/15/2002 11:01:01 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
CAN Batman beat these bold baddies at their own game?

WILL the Caped Crusader be able to put the kibosh on the Joker and his gang of asinine allies?

Tune in next week! Same bat time, same bat channel!

3 posted on 07/15/2002 11:02:10 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Those are great points! I had not considered the fear that could develop from the media's obsession with GW's ties to certain business dealings.
4 posted on 07/15/2002 11:04:14 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
Fear is in full control of Wall Street, but what is it that investors fear? Since the economy is moving up, what are they worried about.

Ever think that the general populace may be smart enough to figure out that there is something very wrong with the econony by themselves?  How do you know the economy is moving up?  The government tell you so?


We, who are the owners of smaller business know something is very wrong since we talk among ourselves and receive "real world" information directly from the real world of business every day.

5 posted on 07/15/2002 11:08:02 AM PDT by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Good list. In addition, we are still working off the huge investments in IT and the resultant bubble of the late 1990s. This is SOP for the introduction of new, highly speculative technologies - a period of giddy bubble expansion followed by a brutal shakeout. The same thing happened in the 1920s and early 1930s, when the new technologies in question were, among other things, electricity and the automobile.
6 posted on 07/15/2002 11:08:56 AM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
There are many billions of dollars to be invested

Right, but once they are sunk into bonds, it is not easy to get them back into stocks.

7 posted on 07/15/2002 11:09:32 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
An entity that is $33.1 trillion in debt with what little capital stock it has left mortgaged for many years into the future does not inspire confidence.

The government's "economic indicators" are worth about as much as an Enron annual report. They are massaged, prodded and poked to say whatever the government and the Federal Reserve want them to say. On a fundamental basis, the idea that masses of numbers can be tabulated and used to render meaningful predictions about the infinitely complex phenomena of the national economy is dubious at best.

8 posted on 07/15/2002 11:09:58 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
Small business/real world bump!
9 posted on 07/15/2002 11:11:04 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DH
Ever consider sharing your real world info with your real world FR members?
10 posted on 07/15/2002 11:11:23 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
The other factor is that main street is no longer in the market. Mom & Pop have gotten out of stocks and taken a much higher cash position in regards 401K's and mutual funds.

Where's the bottom? When we find a confirmed bottom, BUY undervalued bluechips with good accounting histories. Before you ask, yes, I work for Salomon Barney Frank.

11 posted on 07/15/2002 11:11:33 AM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
By any historical measure, dividends, price/earnings ratio, book value, or any reasonable combination, stock prices today are about where they were in September of 1929 BEFORE the market crash in 1929. Stocks were grossly overpriced in terms of underlying earning capacity values.

The economy? The rate of expansion started to slow in the early spring of 1999. Taxes are sufficiently high as to discourage investment and risk investment capital formation; after tax rates of return are to low to permit investors to make a reasonable return on investment.

The rate of economic expansion has continued to slow. We are now in an environment where government is doctoring the numbers instead of the economy--however the 2002Q1 growth numbers were somewhat inflated; the actual in fact GDP numbers are not as positive as the GDP growth would indicate because much production has been for inventory which customers are not buying--that borrows sales from future periods when customers might buy; and it results in capital being tied up in inventory not earning any return.

The government has bought expansion of the residential housing economy by artifically subsidizing house purchases with cheap interest, available on less than adequate security. Thus some of the better than justified economic numbers are the result of uneconomic expansion of residential housing.

Future bad news on the housing front is that homeowners are committed to house payments their income won't support--the lenders and investors who put up the capital won't get their money back; the homeowners will lose their homes.

Large public reporting companies are still reporting some profits (that are not artificial or inflated)? Sure. Because interest rates are also subsidized to artifically low levels--consequence of that is that the dollar is declining in value--so those who have dollars are losing values and the economics of making manufactured goods that rely on overseas supplied components or raw materials won't be able to compete any more.

The economy is not in good shape at all--it is in terrible condition and we have only seen the beginning of the contraction. The stock market is still overvalued after the current declines and we can expect it to fall much further.

From a technical analyst's point of view, we might get a rally here--maybe Greenspan will give us some excuse for a rally; but expect the market to really go down in the fall.

12 posted on 07/15/2002 11:16:18 AM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
The reaction of Wall Street can be laid directly to the doormat of the Democratic Party. They have spent years attacking the successful in this country and now are relishing the opportunity to attack Bush and Cheney, no matter what damage it does to the country.

Daschle has no morals, is a hypocrite and should be run off the stage. He has no credibility. They are using this issue to descredit all business leaders and as justification to rescind the tax cut. They have no economic plan, just attack what the other side does and get as much money to Washington DC as possible.
13 posted on 07/15/2002 11:16:45 AM PDT by Maryland Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
You guys made my mom a nice spot of cash, Thanks!
14 posted on 07/15/2002 11:18:15 AM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
I've been watching LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES for months, and a lot of good info is out on good ol former Bell Labs. For the last week or so, LUCENT stock (LU) has been moving up nicely. It was at 1.38, and now its up to 2.65 in a short period of time. Its still climbing.

What do you attribute this rise in LUCENT to?

15 posted on 07/15/2002 11:18:16 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
Do you think the CEO's will soon be jumping out of windows?? I hope they take some RATS with them!!
(Just kidding......................NOT!)
16 posted on 07/15/2002 11:18:22 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I don't know but I'm getting out now!


17 posted on 07/15/2002 11:19:13 AM PDT by BeamMeUpScotty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
The points list is hogwash.

The market is going down because there are no earnings nor dividends to support it. News does not make the market go up and down, the market going up and down makes the news! If you pay attention, the news lead changes from "Enron took the market down" to " The market shrugged off the Enron news".

One thing people forget is that the market is not a pile of bricks, it is a bonfire. Like a bonfire, the bigger the fire the more money you have to keep throwing on it just to maintain the same level. When that supply dwindles because the last buyer contributed his last dime, the fire starts to die. When the fire dies, companies in debt start to implode. The bankruptcies destroy more capital which leads to less money available for the fire, until the fire runs its course. The market has a long ways to go down yet....and the next wave will start to take to take the consumer down with it. The Dow is headed under 5000, the SP to 600 and the NASDAQ to 800.

18 posted on 07/15/2002 11:19:27 AM PDT by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maryland Man
I dont know about that. Investors are not stupid. Most are oonservative.
19 posted on 07/15/2002 11:19:41 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Another bulletin from the tombstone salesman. ;^)

I'm guessing granite is pretty impervious.
20 posted on 07/15/2002 11:20:08 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson