Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testimony costs flight attendant her job
SignOnSanDiego ^ | July 12, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/12/2002 7:06:01 AM PDT by MizSterious

Testimony costs flight attendant her job

Airline fires witness for admitting pot use

By Kristen Green
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

July 12, 2002

Denise Kemal was fired June 28, more than two weeks after her nationally televised testimony, because the company has a zero-tolerance drug policy.

Losing her job has ruined her life, Kemal said yesterday. "I've always wanted to fly," she said. "It took me years to get my job."

She said she is appealing the dismissal because smoking marijuana "wasn't an everyday thing." While she waits for an answer, Kemal, 28 and recently divorced, watches the Westerfield trial from the couch of her new Florida apartment.

Kemal was called to the witness stand by the prosecution June 10. She was at the van Dam home Feb. 1, the night 7-year-old Danielle van Dam was last seen, and spent the evening with Brenda van Dam, the girl's mother.

The two had become friendly through their husbands, who both work at Qualcomm. A spokeswoman for Southwest confirmed that Kemal had been fired, but declined to elaborate. She said company policy states that the "illegal use of drugs, narcotics or controlled substances off duty and off company premises is not acceptable and may result in termination because it can affect on-the-job performance and the confidence of our customers in the company's ability to meet its responsibilities."

Kemal said she was just answering questions posed to her during Westerfield's trial because "I want to make sure he gets convicted."

"Because of him, it's just ruined everyone's lives," she said.

Kemal testified that she went out with her Tierrasanta neighbor Barbara Easton and Brenda van Dam to Dad's Cafe & Steakhouse in Poway two Fridays in a row, Jan. 25 and Feb. 1. They were celebrating Kemal's upcoming move to Baltimore, where she had been transferred for work.

The second night out, Feb. 1, she was introduced to Westerfield, whom she has described as "creepy." Westerfield is charged with kidnapping and murdering Danielle. If convicted, he could be sentenced to death.

Kemal said the three women first celebrated her move Jan. 25. Kemal and Easton, who lived in the same apartment complex, shared a bottle of wine before driving to the van Dams, Kemal testified. She said she smoked some marijuana in the van Dams' garage before they left for the bar.

The next week, the three women decided to spend that Friday night partying at Dad's again after Damon van Dam canceled plans to go out of town and agreed to stay home with the couple's three children.

On Feb. 1, they smoked pot in the garage a second time, Kemal testified, and she and Easton shared a beer. Later in the evening, they partied at Dad's, where they ran into Westerfield. At one point in the night, they went to van Dam's sport utility vehicle to smoke marijuana again.

Kemal said her supervisors learned that she had smoked pot because customers mailed newspaper articles about her testimony.

She had never had problems at Southwest before the trial, she said. In fact, she regularly received letters of commendation from airline passengers since she was hired in November 1998.

Once, a Texas couple she had met on a flight sent a box of candy to her home. Kemal, in turn, shipped them a set of candles for their living room.

Kemal said that even after Sept. 11, she didn't have any reservations about flying.

"I did it because it's my job, and I love my job," she said. "I get to travel and meet different people. I like to serve the public."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; danielle; denisekemal; kidnap; michaeldobbs; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 761-780 next last
To: FresnoDA
"Kemal laughs in court!
Haaaa! Haaa!! Haaa!!!"


Kemal! You're fired....You're OUTTA HERE!!! LAUGH THAT OFF!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
361 posted on 07/12/2002 1:27:06 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
BUT she has no one to blame but herself. The fact that she blames DW gives more credance that he has been set up as a "Scapegoat". Whose the RN that works with alcoholic, I'm sure she'd have some insight into this?

You are correct..denial and projection are two of the major defense mechanisms in addiction (sex, drugs, gambling)..She is text book!

362 posted on 07/12/2002 1:27:30 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I don't believe this little girl was bound. And I think if the prosecution believed that, they would have stressed it. They didn't.

Ok then do you think that elimates a "stranger" abduction?

363 posted on 07/12/2002 1:29:30 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; RnMomof7; FresnoDA; All
This is old ground, but I began to go back to it today with this release of affidavits.....taking us back to the very beginning.

I have real big problems with the very first moments of this and of course, it just expands from there. But.......

How normal or believable are the first moments of the van Dams in this case ? There are a number of convenient circumstances that just magically (cough, cough) fell into place for them.

1. In spite of various indications of open doors, etc., no one ever looks in on the child ?????
2. All items in the house must have shown no sign of being disturbed ?????
3. Danielle's absence is undetected until 9:00 am ?????
4. Call to 911 is almost immediate ?????
5. Although it is well into daylight and others are awake in the house, BvD and DvD never think that maybe Danielle walked outside on her own and went to a neighbor's ????? They tell the 911 operator that they haven't checked with neighbor's before calling ?????
6. The supposed kidnapper/murderer keeps the victim in his house until daylight, never knowing at what time she may be discovered gone ?????

NONE of this passes the smell test.

I can't think of anyone who would find his/her child's bed empty at 9 in the morning and not at least look outside and in the vicinity of the home. Who would call 911 and report her "missing" immediately when other possiblities were much more likely ?

I think the van Dams should have been deemed suspicious and remained so from day one. Their behavior was much more peculiar and unusual than a stupid hose stretched across a lawn.

Then when it was learned that they regularly "entertained" unsavory people in their home, the delving should have been intense.

I believe it never was more than a superficial scan and Diane Halfman quickly sent LE on their way.

If one stops to really contemplate the activities in those first hours and then consider the strain to make DW be the guilty one, it is really disturbing.

The idea of a frame-up and/or manufactured evidence starts to become more and more feasible.

364 posted on 07/12/2002 1:34:33 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"I think the van Dams should have been deemed suspicious and remained so from day one. Their behavior was much more peculiar and unusual than a stupid hose stretched across a lawn."


Yep. I've been thinking this same thing since the prelim ended. Under the circumstances, if I were one of the investigators, I would have looked long time at Damon. He would have been my first suspect.

365 posted on 07/12/2002 1:39:52 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Krodg; John Jamieson
"Ok then do you think that elimates a "stranger" abduction?"

Y'know, I hadn't put two and two together like that, but considering there was no evidence--bruising, lacerations, etc. of the wrists--of her being bound, that does seem possible, doesn't it?

I guess it's also possible someone killed her in her room and then carried the body out to Dehesa--but if she's dead, and the perp isn't caught, why would he want to carry around the evidence of what he'd done?

This is a good point, and makes one of the pizza partiers or Damon much more likely, doesn't it?

366 posted on 07/12/2002 1:42:57 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
And, you can add to your long list--how did the kidnapper keep her confined? See my post on no evidence of being bound.
367 posted on 07/12/2002 1:45:22 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: calawah98
Explain more about the teaser for Shephard Smith, suggesting that Feldman has something pointing to Brenda...

I will be tuning in to see what, if anything is reported, but doubt it will be of substance, as I can't believe Feldman would say anything and risk Judge Mudd's ire...
368 posted on 07/12/2002 1:47:01 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Very interesting information on who may be called. Thanks.
369 posted on 07/12/2002 1:47:14 PM PDT by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I don't know if it's true or not, but some weeks ago I heard there's a neighbor of DW's that saw Damon leave that night.
370 posted on 07/12/2002 1:49:42 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
Got that right. More big brother BS. Who the hell cares if some flight attendent smokes some weed once in awhile. Why don't you work on drunk pilots and security. What a bunch of jerks. I've flown on Southwest a couple times. Never again.
371 posted on 07/12/2002 1:52:06 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bvw
To all you sanctimonious prigs out there...God forbid anyone takes a microscope to your lives. It feels good judging other people, doesn't it? It's one thing to say, This is a shame, she got caught in a situation nobody would ever dream of getting involved in and she must take the consequeneces. That's what I think. However, it's quite another to CELEBRATE it like some of you are. Shame on you.
372 posted on 07/12/2002 1:53:47 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
You still think consenting adults having sex is worse than collecting images of little kids being raped?
373 posted on 07/12/2002 1:55:16 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I would doubt that this is true, or wouldn't Feldman have been contacted? If he was contacted, could he be prevented from putting it into evidence?

Would he assume it would make things worse for Westerfield?
374 posted on 07/12/2002 1:55:24 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
"Who the hell cares if some flight attendent smokes some weed once in awhile?"


Uhh, s'cuse me, but "I" care. I care a WHOLE LOT & apparently so do the airlines. And I do believe the drunken pilots will lose their jobs, too, if they haven't already. (Haven't kept up with the story.)
375 posted on 07/12/2002 1:56:01 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
no evidence of being bound.

Yep and add the fact that we now know (and LE knew early on) that Barb is an aggressive bisexual who paws on anyone she feels like and same Barb went directly upstairs at the VD house on Pizza night.

Maybe she never did really crawl into Damon's bed. We've only heard that story from known liars.

Maybe Damon wasn't even home.

And just why was the mood so grim late that evening ??????????

376 posted on 07/12/2002 1:58:30 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
Well, not if Damon left while DW was still at Dad's. Like I said, it's just something I'd heard mentioned a few times and didn't know if it is true. Perhaps not, or the neighbor would have been called during the testimony of the neighbors during Feldam's witnesses.
377 posted on 07/12/2002 1:59:05 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
Go picket the FAA, Greg...they make the rules.

I'm thankful you are staying off Southwest...means one less filled seat for Non-rev...:~)

sw

378 posted on 07/12/2002 1:59:16 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"And just why was the mood so grim late that evening ??????????"


Ya know, that's a VERY GOOD question indeed.


379 posted on 07/12/2002 2:00:56 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Absolutely. Now that neither Duh Knees or the other guy, whatsisname, will be flying SW, it might be my first choice.
380 posted on 07/12/2002 2:02:01 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 761-780 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson