[BlessingInDisguise]

OH DAMNIT! I'm so sick of the endless parade of these stories. Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation to make more laws and end more freedoms and on and on and on...heil! heil! heil!

[browardchad]

I'm so sick of the endless parade of these stories. Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation to make more laws and end more freedoms and on and on and on...heil! heil! heil!

Exactly what freedoms does this story suggest ending? I hardly consider background checks on foreign nationals -- something the State Department routinely fails to do -- as an assault on any American's freedom.

As far as making more laws, the gist of the complaints against 245(i) is that it should not be reinstated, since it provides a loophole. We need less laws that allow potential terrorists to enter the country.

[Travis McGee]

Freedom is not the same as a national death wish.

Unless of course, you want to be free to destroy our nation.

[Twodees]

[Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation]

No, this story has a different twist. The loophole was in the amnesty legislation which has expired, but which GW wants to pass again. The article is more a warning about allowing 245i to be slipped back into law.