I missed most of the testimony today as I had to be gone, but I am hearing the TV pundits say that Faulkner testified to the fact that the body could not have been placed there any later than the 16th-18th, but he could not say with certainty that it might have been placed earlier. Other than the fact no bug evidence showed any earlier. One of the pundits said what about the fact that massive parts of her body were gone. Maybe they would have showed bug evidence of an earlier time.
So how do you think it went today? For the Defense or Prosecution?
One of the pundits said what about the fact that massive parts of her body were gone. Maybe they would have showed bug evidence of an earlier time.The area most attractive to insects ..the mouth, nose, ears and eyes and the vagina (which was missing, I believe) but would have left an opening for infestation were all there.