Replies

Now, help me out here, doesn't "bipartisan" mean both sides equally?

Democrats in the 1990s and Republicans in the 2000s. Perhaps Klayman will target the Green Party in 2010s...

Some of you don't get it -- Klayman filed lawsuits against the clintons so the clintons knew what was out there so they could get out in front of stories with their spinmeisters while at the same time Klayman was banking big dollars.. After discovery, the cases died -- no further action -- none necessary -- clinton's had it all.

When are some of you going to wake-up -- Klayman scammed conservatives using the clintons to get his money while at the same time getting ready to go after Bush for the RATS. I guess you could say that conservatives have helped Klayman in his pursuit of Bush.

What about going after ms. clinton and her part in pardons or clinton and pardons? Or an even better one -- Global Crossing! Or how about voters voting in two different states in the same election? You want me to go on about these legimate cases he is not interested in pursuing? No mention of any of these -- zero,zip,nada.

Mark my word when this is all said and done you are going to find the connected dots including Perot, clintons, and Klayman. Who except the clintons did klayman go after? How many of his clinton suits went anywhere after the initial phase? How many of the clinton lawsuits are active?

You all can defend JW, but when it is all said and done, you have bet on the wrong horse!

Klayman isn't ever going to "get" anybody. Never has. Never will.