Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I asked you a DIRECT question. Unless you answer it with a "yes" or "no," we'll all just have to assume you agree with Larry.
461 posted on 07/11/2002 10:54:53 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You assume and believe whatever you want to anyway.
462 posted on 07/11/2002 10:59:03 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
By the way, Dan Quayle was a pretty good vice president. I guess FIJC is also buying the Rat line about Quayle.
463 posted on 07/11/2002 10:59:29 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Dan Quayle was a good vice president. Cheney is a good one as well. Cheney is NOT the "de facto " President, unless you think all those meetings with Putin were simply for show. I would like you to answer Howlin's question, please.
464 posted on 07/11/2002 11:01:00 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I never said that I didn't like Dan Quayle or that he wasn't a good vice-president.

I liked the fact that Quayle was strongly pro-family and pro-life. And I also liked the fact that Quayle stood up to the liberal media on several occasions.

I LIKED Dan Quayle a lot, but he was a different kind of vice-president than Cheney is.

465 posted on 07/11/2002 11:03:00 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
I don't think "supersillyous" is a misspelling so much as it's a sniglet--a word that's not in the dictionary, but ought to be.

I invented the word "administrivia" in the same spirit.

466 posted on 07/11/2002 11:04:19 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
How is Howlin's question even relevant to the subject at hand? It isn't and therefore, I am not going to answer it.
467 posted on 07/11/2002 11:04:34 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
A Henry Higgins, you are not.
468 posted on 07/11/2002 11:05:38 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Why won't you answer? Aren't you sure, as you always are, that Larry is correct?
469 posted on 07/11/2002 11:05:43 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Drop it.
470 posted on 07/11/2002 11:06:20 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Drop what?
471 posted on 07/11/2002 11:06:58 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
It is relevant because that is what Larry Klayman said when HE was talking about this lawsuit.

Now answer, yes or no.

472 posted on 07/11/2002 11:07:00 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
No, I will not. Either you agree with him or not.

Why aren't you honest enough to say?

473 posted on 07/11/2002 11:07:53 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I invented the word "administrivia" in the same spirit.

You have some sort of Mojo complex.

474 posted on 07/11/2002 11:08:38 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; FreedominJesusChrist
Forwarding mail recived in error.
475 posted on 07/11/2002 11:09:24 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT AGREE WITH LARRY KLAYMAN THAT GEORGE W. BUSH IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES...

How did you extract that from Larry Klayman's comments?

You're imagining things again.

476 posted on 07/11/2002 11:10:14 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
The transcript from Larry's appearance was posted on this thread this morning. In it, he discusses Halliburton and Cheney (the subject of this thread) and then goes on to make his comment about Cheney being a de-facto President, indicating that is one of the reasons why this lawsuit is so darned important and why we must have it right now.

So, these are Larry's words, and we would like to know if you think that this comment was appropriate and correct. It is very pertinent to the subject at hand, and if you do not wish to answer, that is your privilege; however, you will have shown that you are a bit of a coward, either afraid to disagree with Larry or afraid to stick up for him.

477 posted on 07/11/2002 11:10:45 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin,

My opinion about what Larry Klayman said in a TV interview is not in anyway, relevant to this thread.

Larry Klayman never stated that Cheney was "the real" President anyway.

478 posted on 07/11/2002 11:11:39 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
It is IN THE TRANSCRIPT, you dolt.

Once again, you are wrong.

479 posted on 07/11/2002 11:11:54 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
He most certainly did.
480 posted on 07/11/2002 11:12:27 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 3,801-3,815 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson