|
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,641-2,660, 2,661-2,680, 2,681-2,700 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
That doesn't surprise me a bit that Cheney was involved in this "slip up" accounting measure. Now he's just got to answer to it. And that ought to get interesting.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I don't think I pinged you to comment on any of it. Unless it was last night.
Getting a little crude in your "choice of language" aren't you? It's not becoming in a young girl. JMHO.
To: goldilucky
It sure will get interesting. Better hope Mr. Klayman has his finances in order. He's about to get creamed.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Goodnight or goodbye? Please be specific and sincere.
To: goldilucky
What slip up? Do you anything about accounting? Sounds like you have a bone to pick with Cheney, right troll?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Are you interning this summer? Or in summer school? Or maybe manning the phones somewhere???
To: goldilucky
That doesn't surprise me a bit that Cheney was involved in this "slip up" accounting measure.Can you explain to us what you find deficient in the accounting?
To: Howlin; Iwo Jima
I know, but I've sworn my hairdresser to secrecy.
Some day I hope to be as fortunate as Iwo. Sure seems like a nice place to live. Ovaltine, Viagra...
And the meds are hardly ever late.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Sure .. don't ping me when you are talking about me
Well I never
2,669
posted on
07/16/2002 7:53:48 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Amelia
Hmmmmm .. I don't think she liked my post
2,670
posted on
07/16/2002 7:55:01 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Howlin
Yes, I do agree. But, the Court is to treat Klayman's claims as neutral and allow for Discovery to take place. Then we'll see what's up.
To: FreedominJesusChrist; Mo1
Flame war? I thought everybody has been pretty civil the past couple of nights.
If you venture out past the Larry posts, you'd find that the heated debate goes on all over FR.
The Israel threads, the religion threads, the I hate Bush/I love Bush threads, the there's been an explosion oh no I hope nobody died while others are cracking jokes threads.
You have a blind spot when it comes to Larry.
It's called disagreement. It happens. Or at least it does in the real world.
To: Amelia
Cheney had signed off his name on some checks and other documents as far back as 1998 knowing that these amounted figures were unreported to others outside the company that had invested in the company. Not only that but he was given low loan rates that nobody from the outside investing would have knowledge of.
To: Mo1
Maybe she has a date.
To: Amelia
WHAT .. she is dating Larry??
2,675
posted on
07/16/2002 8:02:43 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: goldilucky
Really, I didn't know we'd gotten through the discovery phase yet.
Yet you've somehow been made privy to all of the facts, judged them on their merit, brought it all to trial, and come to the conclusion that there was, in fact, a "slip up" and Cheney was involved.
It "doesn't surprise me a bit"...
To: Mo1
"Hmmmmm .. I don't think she liked my post" And you are crushed...I am sure.
To: goldilucky
Cheney had signed off his name on some checks and other documents as far back as 1998 knowing that these amounted figures were unreported to others outside the company that had invested in the company. Not only that but he was given low loan rates that nobody from the outside investing would have knowledge of. Is it just me, or is this statement on the verge of incoherent? I'm a little tired tonight.
goldilucky, if I assumed you had documentation for these allegations, would I be doing what the wags say you do when you assume?
To: terilyn
For sure .. can't you see my tears .. LOL
2,679
posted on
07/16/2002 8:16:21 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Mo1; terilyn
Ok, girls, we're doing fairly well...only 320 left to go.
Where's Iwo?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,641-2,660, 2,661-2,680, 2,681-2,700 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson