Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)

CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

[SierraWasp]

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, because this poll was posted on FR and linked, this was a malicious attempt to sway the results of this poll.

This poll is just not accurate because of the link from FR.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

It is of course, my opinion.

[terilyn]

Well, you already admitted that you were able to vote more than once...

[FreedominJesusChrist]

No I didn't!

[terilyn]

I wasn't complaining that I couldn't vote more than once, and I wouldn't waste a long distance call on Judicial Watch if you paid for it.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, this might have been stated before the poll had closed.

[deport]

So you want admit to talking to your buds over at the watch? Very interesting to say the least.

[terilyn]

Thank you and done!

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Do you need the e-mail address for the webmaster there? That would not be a long distance phone call.

[A Citizen Reporter]

"But that is the whole problem, your votes were not random."

Pardon my confusion here, but I do not undestand. Wouldn't you say that Larry actually launched himself by his association with this website....and Fox News duing the impeachment? Why should the votes of people on this website now not be counted? Because we know him too well?

[terilyn]

Then I misunderstood your post #1464 where you stated,
"Well, it's not that way on my computer".

[Amelia]

I believe that they are also aware that people on this website are purposefully trying to make their poll look bad.

I was making a logical guess or speculation.

Yeah, right. Backpedal, you're good at it.

And you REALLY TRULY think that nearly 1900 people (ask a math major) went over to JW from this one thread last night before the poll quit working? (and if you'll notice from the posts, it DID quickly quit working).

I doubt that many people even READ this thread, at least during the time period in question!

[Texasforever]

This poll is just not accurate because of the link from FR

Then maybe Larry and his pixies should boycott FR. I can promise you this, he is now the darling of DU.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Yes, you did misunderstand :)

[FreedominJesusChrist]

You are delusional.

[Texasforever]

You are delusional.

Really? Please elaborate.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, I was making a logical guess.

[terilyn]

"Well, this might have been stated before the poll had closed."

Gosh, Larry "might have" put out a press release declaring the "results" of his poll before the results were in? Like I said before, how "ethical".

And further, isn't that interesting...I hear that's how they decide presidential elections in the liberal media in Florida as well.

Next thing you know he'll be calling for Cheney's impeachment before all the facts have been presented...whoops, already did that.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

No elaboration needed. I have better ways to spend my time than to flame you anyway, texasforeverandever.

[terilyn]

Thanks but no thanks.

I was afraid to click on the link in post #1441 for fear of being inundated with fund-raising spam.