Is Law And Order Conservatism Dead? (It Sure Looks Like It)

Several threads here ^ | 7-10-02 | LibBasher

[LibBasher]

I saw a few threads here yesterday about the Inglewood cop thing. I expected to see comment posts all about revulsion at the PC media's latest propaganda. I expected to see criticism of the Uncivil rights leaders (racebaiting demogogues) that will use this to spread hatred of white people everywhere and justify criminal behavior (and of course take from our wallets).

But I didn't. Instead I saw a very few brave conservatives standing up for law and order being relentlessly bashed by a much larger bunch of, well, I don't know what.

As to the matter discussed: The criminal idiot kid attacked and hit the cop hard enough to produce a gash on his head. When people are hit they usually hit back, whether its cops or anybody else. At most the guy should be briefly suspended without pay or written up (that's what would happen if this country was purged of PC lunacy).

But there's a lot larger issue here: Why some people here of all places would make a huge big deal over a criminal who cracked a cop in the head getting thrown down is just amazing.

So what do you people think will happen now? Well I'll tell you. Exactly what usually happens. The cops will catch fewer criminals, and crime will go up, because that's what happens everytime there's one of these media driven racebaiter PC love-in cop hater fests (riots will most likely follow).

You guys are furthering the PC movement motto: "white cops are out to get all black people?" all just to increase crime and liberal victimization propaganda (and most likely government spending on social programs to help "poor unfortunate victims" like this kid). What is wrong with you? Are you a bunch of liberals or something?

'cause you're sure helping out their cause.

[general_re]

(just trying to get with this new conservatism so I don't get banned, by the censors, er moderators, did I do good?)

No, you have failed. The evil cop should be dragged across broken glass and dipped in rubbing alcohol. He should be forced to watch as his family is repeatedly violated by the entire population of Los Angeles County. He should be drawn and quartered, keelhauled, and made to walk the plank. He should be made to walk on hot coals, eat hot coals, and repeatedly violated by hot coals. And given a two-week suspension without pay. And a reprimand.

And the kid he beat should receive 100 million billion trillion dollars and free sexual favors from the entire female population of California for the rest of his life. Further, he should receive a ticker-tape parade, a key to the city, and a proclamation from the President declaring him "America's Finest Young Man". Okay?

Now that we've dispensed with that idiocy, perhaps you'd like to return to the real world, where it appears that this particular officer used excessive, unnecessary force in this particular case. Whaddaya say?

[Orual]

[liberalism=failure]

---Looks like we get to do this all over again...---

Oh no no no. I apologize I was all wrong, and I promise to never disagree again.

This cop is a disgrace, he is a racist and probably a sexists and a homphobe too, sure the kid hit him and made him mad but that is no excuse he needs the death penalty and nothing less will do.

And BTW LEOS are ALL EVIL and I hate them, hate them ,hate them! We'd all be better off without them they're all white racist hatemongers!!!!!!

ANd this kid, he should get 500 million dollars and never go to jail a day, in fact we should make a new holiday in honoer of his victimization and call it--Stop police brutality day!

And of course there are millions like him who need our help I urge a tax increase immediately to help such victims of society!

I hope that was good, can I be one of you guys, now, can I can I can I???? PAAAALLLLEASE? PRETTY PLEASE!!!!!!!

[general_re]

Law_And_Order_Citizens_Against_Moderator_Brutality

We need a civilian review board, obviously...

[Bandolier]

I_AM_EARTH'S_ONLY_CONSERVATIVE_THE_REST_OF_YOU_ARE_LIBERAL_NUTCASES

[truenospinzone]

So can I assume the answer to the question I posed to you in post #149 is "Yes, we are one and the same"?

[liberalism=failure]

Now that we've dispensed with that idiocy,

When did you do that?

[liberalism=failure]

So can I assume the answer to the question I posed to you in post #149

There is no question posed to me in #149

[truenospinzone]

I apologize - that would be post #156...

[general_re]

Now that we've dispensed with that idiocy,

When did you do that?

I meant "we" in the general sense. Truthfully, the moderators were the ones who dispensed with that idiocy about half an hour ago, when they kick/banned you under your other name...

[liberalism=failure]

I_AM_EARTH'S_ONLY_CONSERVATIVE_THE_REST_OF_YOU_ARE_LIBERAL_NUTCASES

if you;re going to act like a racebaiting PC liberal who hates all cops and acts like a cop who hits a guy who attacked him, resisted arrest, and knocked him on the head is Adolph Hitler II

Then you may be right on some other issues but on this issue you are behaving just like a liberal

But I don't expect you guys to argue your point when banning people for dissent (and I checked back and saw not one rule in the code broken by libasher) works so much better.

And BTW that's something that liberals do too.

[truenospinzone]

Having trouble finding post #156 now?

[general_re]

Having trouble finding post #156 now?

Give him a minute - Clintonesque non-denial denials take a while for some folks to dream up...

[liberalism=failure]

Truthfully, the moderators were the ones who dispensed with that idiocy about half an hour ago, when they kick/banned you under your other name...

actually that was libasher, but then maybe its hard for you to believe that there are actually some conservatives left who don;t hate all cops, call them racists, and want them lynched for even the smallest infraction. But nonethless there are.

as far as moderators banning. It seems to me that banning someone who breaks no rules is nothing but censorship.

But like I said its always easier to silence people than to prevail against them in an argument,

[general_re]

actually that was libasher

Whatever.

[liberalism=failure]

---Having trouble finding post #156 now?---

first it was 149 now its #156 Ah how like liberal to blame others for one's own mistakes.

---How odd that you found this thread just minutes after libbasher got tossed---

Why did he or she get tossed. Which rule did he/she break and where?

[liberalism=failure]

---Give him a minute - Clintonesque non-denial denials take a while for some folks to dream up...---

I bet Clinton doesn't like this evil racist cop either. I wonder what else you and he have in common?

[liberalism=failure]

provide an example of where someone who had their head busted open hit someone else back one time and got prosecuted for it

oh, nevermind, you never will, who am I kidding?