Not necessarily true. Nothing (except the Bible, by some interpretations) says that God couldn't use evolution as his method of creation.
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...personal-PRIVATE moral/social character-values GROWTH!
Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY/govt. RELIGION---bigotry/intolerance---HYPOCRISY...
Age of the taliban/pharisees(unreal-maufactured world)...EVO-WHACKS---ZEALOTS...
Then came the post-modern age of switch-flip-spin-DEFORMITY-cancer...Atheist secular materialists through ATHEISM/evolution CHANGED-REMOVED the foundations...demolished the wall(separation of state/religion)--trampled the TRUTH-GOD...built a satanic temple/SWAMP-MALARIA/RELIGION(cult of darwin-marx-satan) over them---made these absolutes subordinate--relative and calling all the residuals---technology/science === evolution to substantiate/justify their efforts--claims...social engineering--PC--atheism...anti-God/Truth RELIGION--crusade/WAR--INTOLERANCE/TYRANNY...against God--man--society!!
When you understand the tremendous depth of this statement, you'll understand the poverty of both evolution and creationism qua theory.
Seems to me that you would have to be quite a sophistic lawyer to 'interpret' the following as allowing for evolution:
In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being by Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
John, 1.