Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA'S PRESENT TO AMERICA ON INDEPENDENCE DAY
Pravda ^ | 2002-07-03 | Vasily Bubnov

Posted on 07/03/2002 10:26:58 AM PDT by Texaggie79

Right on the eve of Independence Day, a rather unexpected event has occured: Russian companies started direct oil supplies to the USA. Very few people believed that it would happen indeed.

Beginning of the oil supplies is very important from both political and economic points of view. First, Washington demonstrates its interest in a close partnership with Russia not only fixed in documents, but in practice first of all. Russia’s Astro Lupus oil tanker will be met by US Deputy Energy Minister Michael Smith and US Congress members Nicolas Lampson and Ken Bentsen. This fact demonstrates the importance of the deliveries.

It is no secret that the USA wants to reduce the dependence of the US economy on oil import from Mideast countries. Russian oil is an alternative in this case. As of now, it is difficult to say to what extent the oil deliveries will be economically justified. The matter of the fact is that the first tanker with Russian oil has covered a rather long way: originally, the oil was loaded onto the tanker in the port of Novorossiisk, then by the Black, Aegean, and Mediterranean seas, it was delivered to Houston. On the other hand, the route from the Persian Gulf is also rather long.

President of YUKOS, a Russian company that performs oil deliveries to the USA, Mikhail Khodorkovsky announced recently the intention to make oil supplies economically rational, one barrel of Russian oil is to cost $25 at least. It is to be taken into consideration that Russian oil is of a lower quality than the Mideast oil. And, consequently, its price on the world markets is much lower than $25.

On the other hand, if the project continues, Mideast countries will have no opportunity to threaten the USA with the cessation of oil supplies. Therefore, Washington is getting more chances for therealization of its Mideast policy, and the USA appreciates this fact very much.

The beginning of the oil supplies is also very important for Russia’s economy as well. If they become regular, Moscow can look at OPEC from a considerable distance. OPEC, as is known, is not remarkable for its unity of opinions; the increase of quotas for oil sales has been discussed for several months already.

And what is more, unlike the Middle East, Russia has no reason to blackmail the USA with cessation of oil supplies, and no reasons are likely to appear in the future.

On the whole, time will tell to what extent the project turns out to be economically justified. This is just the first shipment of oil from Russia.

Vasily Bubnov
PRAVDA.Ru


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: america; bushdoctrineunfold; davissimontv; independenceday; oil; pravda; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Texaggie79
Wow....will be interesting to see how limited this will be.
41 posted on 07/03/2002 11:07:16 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Personally, I hate communists and the Chinese are hell-bent on destorying us. No partnership, no friendship. Just enemies. Let's take the fight to them while we can.
42 posted on 07/03/2002 11:07:52 AM PDT by CreekerFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I LOVE THIS CARTOON!!!
43 posted on 07/03/2002 11:08:17 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I know it seems like a remote possibilty now, but who would hve predicted a US-Russia partnership 20 years ago?

Certainly not this guy

Leonid Brezhnev dies from heart attack at 8:30 A.M, November 10, 1982

44 posted on 07/03/2002 11:09:16 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
"Leonid Brezhnev dies from heart attack at 8:30 A.M, November 10, 1982" immediately after hearing U.S. President Ronald Reagan refer to the Soviet Union as the "Evil Empire" :-)
45 posted on 07/03/2002 11:11:57 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; lodwick; mountaineer
I figured this needed to be copied onto the Guild, but I have zero HTML skills.
46 posted on 07/03/2002 11:12:02 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Semper911
Seems like a tough set-up. They need a pipeline. They need some outside investment. Won't cut off OPEC altogether, but looks like it'd make a good dent.
48 posted on 07/03/2002 11:12:28 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
the cost of saudi oil and other persian gulf oil countries is too high in terms of money and people...just look at the cost in lives and money at the world trade center...
49 posted on 07/03/2002 11:12:44 AM PDT by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Bolshoe spaciba nashim druzyam v rossii... That really is good news.
50 posted on 07/03/2002 11:12:57 AM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Thanks for the ping.

BTTT for a huge middle finger to the Saudi's. I heard about this a couple of weeks ago and what is reported here is just the tip of the iceberg, that will eventually sink the Saudi "Titanic".

Now, where are all the Bush-bashers that hammered him for kowtowing to the Saudi Princes? Remember the vitriol? He's doing his daddy favors for all the business dealings, and on and on, ad infinitum.

51 posted on 07/03/2002 11:13:43 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Can you say "RELECT THE stupid, dyslexic, drunken, frat boy"???
52 posted on 07/03/2002 11:14:00 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I don't want to rain on the parade, but this is more symbolic than actual. It's fairly unlikely that the US will buy a whole lot of Russian oil anytime soon.

The reason is purely economic. The world oil market automatically delivers oil to the most efficient destination. It hardly makes sense for us to buy lower quality crude that has to be shipped further.

The benefits are just as real, however. Russian oil will most likely find its natural destination in eastern Europe. That will replace oil there which probably comes primarily from the Middle East. The Gulf countries will have to find new buyers or water their lawns with it.

It's all a matter of supply and demand with logistical factors playing a large role. The US will primarily get its imported oil from Mexico and Venezuela, just as it does now. The price will continue to drop as more Russian supply reaches the market. Our actual consumption of oil from the Middle East might not drop at all, yet we will be less dependent on it because we could substitute Russian oil if we had to.

But I don't think a whole lot of Russian oil is in our immediate future. That could change if the big oil fields on their Pacific Coast are developed or pipeline capacity from Siberia is increased (although China would likely be the primary customer of Siberian oil). Russian oil could replace Alaskan oil as the primary fuel for West Coast refineries if further exploration of Alaska is not permitted.

53 posted on 07/03/2002 11:14:25 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Nice find and I agree completely with your summation of the monumental ramifications of this.
54 posted on 07/03/2002 11:15:00 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
As usual, much ado about nothing. - The russians say they cannot make money at less than $25 barrel. - This scheme ain't gonna work.




As of now, it is difficult to say to what extent the oil deliveries will be economically justified. The matter of the fact is that the first tanker with Russian oil has covered a rather long way: originally, the oil was loaded onto the tanker in the port of Novorossiisk, then by the Black, Aegean, and Mediterranean seas, it was delivered to Houston. On the other hand, the route from the Persian Gulf is also rather long.

President of YUKOS, a Russian company that performs oil deliveries to the USA, Mikhail Khodorkovsky announced recently the intention to make oil supplies economically rational, one barrel of Russian oil is to cost $25 at least.

It is to be taken into consideration that Russian oil is of a lower quality than the Mideast oil.
And, consequently, its price on the world markets is much lower than $25.

55 posted on 07/03/2002 11:16:27 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine; Texasforever; PhiKapMom; Howlin; Miss Marple; Grampa Dave
The eternal optimist has spoken!
56 posted on 07/03/2002 11:20:05 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: redhead
If and when they do, be assured they will associate Clinton/Gore efforts in Russia during the '90's to make sure Bush doesn't get all or majority credit.


57 posted on 07/03/2002 11:20:23 AM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That could change if the big oil fields on their Pacific Coast are developed or pipeline capacity from Siberia is increased

My understanding of some of the deals concluded when Bush was in Russia last, are exactly the same as your quote reflected above.

I agree with your logistical analysis, however, as new fields are developed the possibility increases.

In any event, this is HUGE.

58 posted on 07/03/2002 11:22:01 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I haven't had time to check today. But are there any stories about this in our papers?
59 posted on 07/03/2002 11:22:42 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Yeah and I wonder what the criticism will be over at the Dummies. Probably something about Bush taking over the oil in Russia.
60 posted on 07/03/2002 11:23:22 AM PDT by gbaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson