Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SF bans urinating in public
San Jose Mercury News ^ | July 2, 2002 | Renee Koury

Posted on 07/02/2002 11:15:57 PM PDT by paul51

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Wphile
There are bums everywhere and so much garbage it's disgusting.

BUMS! Oh my how unPC of you. Homeless is the correct term. There are no such things as bums or hobbos any longer. Get with it. </sarcasm>

41 posted on 07/03/2002 8:08:37 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Will this law have any effect on the policy of urinating on the Clinton LIEbrary in Little Rock?
42 posted on 07/03/2002 8:12:28 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
Bums and hobos didn't become "homeless" until Ronald Reagan became president. I'm not saying that they had homes, they just became "the homeless" under his presidency.
43 posted on 07/03/2002 8:19:38 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Bums and hobos didn't become "homeless" until Ronald Reagan became president. I'm not saying that they had homes, they just became "the homeless" under his presidency.

I agree. It was part of the left's campaign to make Reagan look "heartless". Homeless=Heartless republicans. Clever. Didn't work very well though. Ronnie was just too good.

44 posted on 07/03/2002 11:00:23 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: paul51
Hold on a minute - the First Amendment specifically protects peeing on the wall as a form of free speech. It's one o' them "penumbra" thingies.

Heck, call it "performance art" and you'll get a gummint grant to do it. Some people just don't know how to play the angles...

46 posted on 07/03/2002 11:06:31 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Unless it's a golden shower.



47 posted on 07/03/2002 11:06:45 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
So . . . they're going to fine homeless people. That's pretty funny.
48 posted on 07/03/2002 11:08:28 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
You got me thinking of an interesting point:

What if there is snow on the ground and you are "writing" something? Free speech!!!

Since the method by which you "write" is not permanent perhaps this is a protected form of free speech.

ahem...

49 posted on 07/03/2002 11:43:55 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
After Bill Clinton left office, we stopped getting movies about the homeless and songwriters couldn't get a hit or industry award for writing a song about the homeless.

But with a Republican in the White House again, we are learning that there are homeless people again.

I wonder if people are still starving in Ethiopia like they were in 1985.

50 posted on 07/03/2002 11:47:50 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Hey, what if you are a street performer? Don't need no gub'mint grant. Free Speech again!

2 guys at some MTV event did this in their "act" (a gong show type audience rating contest) and the woman that participated sued.

Maybe you need a gub'mint grant after all. G.G. Allen did this sort of thing in bars across the country at his "concerts" (he would even chase down audience members) without a grant though so who knows (he did end up doing some jailtime for some sort of offenses and later died after a show).

What's the 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals doing today? Maybe they can determine if this is "free speech".

51 posted on 07/03/2002 11:52:28 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: paul51
"...and it was expected to be signed by Mayor Willie Brown before going into effect in 30 days..."

Oh,sure he will.I doubt that.All these years and they have to pass a law for it?As if that's going to deter anyone up there.NO it won't.But in true liberal fashion,they have allowed themselves to "Feel Good" about passing a law that is in fact common sense for the rest of the country.They should be embarrassed.

52 posted on 07/03/2002 12:43:23 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Preservative
SF bans urinating in public? How intoooooooollllllerant of them. Will wonders never cease?

Heck, I'd figure they'd provide "free" litter boxes for the bums...homeless

53 posted on 07/03/2002 8:45:23 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson