Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trial of David Westerfield: Experts Testify At Closed-door Sessions: (DEFENSE BEGINS!! 7-02-2002)
Union Trib ^ | July 2, 2002 | Union Trib

Posted on 07/01/2002 5:50:00 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980981-989 next last
To: UCANSEE2
I agree with where you are headed with this.

I posted on a differnt thread that it seems to me that the prosecution witnesses were each assured that the LE had solid evidence that DW was their man. That they needed each prosecution witness to just add another nail to his coffin.

But when it came down to it, each witness was left flailing on his/her own, and Feldman and Boyce were only to happy to nail a few hides to the wall.

Maybe because of the time constraints, LE believed that they would run into that big pile of convicting evidence. IMO, they never did. But it's also horrifying to think about the state going for the death penalty in a case where they don't even have convicting evidence!

961 posted on 07/02/2002 5:58:56 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
ROFL!
962 posted on 07/02/2002 6:01:04 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Fres, I am really fond of you, but you "Ain't no Johnny Cochran!" : )
963 posted on 07/02/2002 6:07:07 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Very Good, I read all your site and have to agree it covers all the contingencies, except one! Can he see in the dark? You see I'm still trying to figure out how he found the right room in the dark, so quickly. Or did he wait for daylight? Me, I'd have to wait for daylight!
964 posted on 07/02/2002 6:07:17 PM PDT by Rattlins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 949 | View Replies]

To: spectre

NEW THREAD ALERT!!

Westerfield attorney's begin defense: Dusek STUNNED by Defense calling for Keith Stone. Barb next?


965 posted on 07/02/2002 6:12:37 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
How did Feldman know that info was going to be in Keenes notes?.....Keene wouldn't have let it be known to him, would he? (didn't hinder the states motivation, but allowed the truth to be told thru the defense?)

In California, notes are discoverable and defense will routinely ask for them in discovery. Many times PD notes seem to be lost or destroyed before defense can get to see them. My guess is Defense got the notes after the prelim thus the questions now and not before.

On other note, the picture today showing DW not sweating and Keene with gloves...makes me wonder why Parga and Keeene left the fact that they were wearing glove out of their reports until the last minute of pre-trial motions..could it be they became aware of the photograph, thus locked into wearing them?

966 posted on 07/02/2002 6:13:56 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 943 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Do you have a picture of this I need it badly. Anyone?
967 posted on 07/02/2002 6:22:32 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
I dont have one but according to news article at new link Feldman was just given the photo...like I said before its a gave of hide the ball...if he had it it might have helped in pretrial motions...
968 posted on 07/02/2002 6:26:38 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 967 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
NEW THREAD
See #965 above.
969 posted on 07/02/2002 6:28:53 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
NEW THREAD
See #965 above.
970 posted on 07/02/2002 6:29:49 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies]

To: pyx
I don't want to miss anyone's discussion's, no matter what you have to say. ALso, I have posted a summary of the Prosecution's opening statement. Let's compare it to what has gone on during their presentation.

Please come to the new thread, if you haven't. I posted a link back to here to make it convenient to flip back/forth.

Thanks....

971 posted on 07/02/2002 6:31:31 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 969 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Shame is good......her defense "well it was a swap" ..pathetic

Well said!

972 posted on 07/02/2002 6:37:52 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies]

To: Rattlins
You see I'm still trying to figure out how he found the right room in the dark, so quickly. Or did he wait for daylight? Me, I'd have to wait for daylight!

Easy...he used night vision goggles!

973 posted on 07/02/2002 6:40:20 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Just got back. Re:your post 840 You are so right! The dishes and the spade are easy to explain...but the closet light? WHAT IN THE WORLD WERE YOU THINKING!!!!You darn right, I didn't have all the facts. That poor feline never had a chance! So,so sad......
974 posted on 07/02/2002 6:46:11 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
BTW, wonder what if anything was left out of the clerks testimony...

His religion ?

I wore "baggies" (surf-wear) almost every day as "undies" when i lived in OB.
I still do ( sorry 'bout that; too much information, I guess ),
And I'm 3 hours from the nearest beach ( the lake is only 2 minutes though ).

975 posted on 07/02/2002 7:01:33 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Hey! I'm here, way behind on reading, but feelin' groovy. Thanks for shouldering the transcription load all day. Since ye olde migraine is gone now, I'll try to help you out more tomorrow. If today was any indication, should be some interesting witnesses.
976 posted on 07/02/2002 7:05:08 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
You must be trying to start some something. I read these posts every day after work. I've only posted a couple of times, mainly it is for information on the pros and cons of the case. Your input is valuable as is Kims input. This would be very very boring thread if us readers only got to view one side of the trial.

We who cannot hear or see the trial rely on this thread. Whether it be someone for DW or against DW, it matters not to us, lets see both sides of the trial. I look forward to reading your views and the others equally.

977 posted on 07/02/2002 7:16:06 PM PDT by jdontom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 934 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
What is a hat cam?

It's like the hat that Chicago Bears fans wear. Except instead of beer strapped to the head, it's a video camera.

978 posted on 07/02/2002 7:39:05 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
because when I went over there to score some Sweet-N-Low

Bhaaa !

Fresno, --you're @sshole.
Invoice 1 keyboard and a sinus-full of beer.

979 posted on 07/02/2002 8:17:58 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
That could be when the pubic hair

Kim. Take a breath. You're really past it.

980 posted on 07/02/2002 9:00:04 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980981-989 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson