Skip to comments.
Trial of David Westerfield: Experts Testify At Closed-door Sessions: (DEFENSE BEGINS!! 7-02-2002)
Union Trib ^
| July 2, 2002
| Union Trib
Posted on 07/01/2002 5:50:00 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980, 981-989 next last
To: Rheo
?....if they felt it wrong..could they, or would it be conceivable for them to run a parallel investigation without "compromising" the directed investigation? SOrry,kinda went on a rant. DIdn't mean to ignore all of your questions. SO, here is the other part.
I don't think they had the time or resources to run a parallel investigation. If DW is not convicted in her death, maybe they will be allowed to conduct a further investigation. It may be to late to produce anything.
To: FresnoDA; All
For the Love of G-d...will someone PLEASE start a new thread...PLEASE!!!!sw
942
posted on
07/02/2002 5:41:18 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: UCANSEE2; All
How did Feldman know that info was going to be in Keenes notes?.....Keene wouldn't have let it be known to him, would he? (didn't hinder the states motivation, but allowed the truth to be told thru the defense?)
Do I sound like I'm drama seeking??
943
posted on
07/02/2002 5:41:59 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
It was subjective.
944
posted on
07/02/2002 5:42:54 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: UCANSEE2
I enjoy your "rants", don't worry if you miss answering a question....I keep repeating the ones I want answered anyway!!
945
posted on
07/02/2002 5:43:12 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Kimmie, Det Parga saw the hose as a red flag I can see what he was thinking. Of course he didn't have the benefit of knowing if this was par for DW.
What he did see, I think, was that DW filled his RV with water, and was in a big hurry. He was adding this to other details being fed to him by other investigators that were talking to a public that was hyped up by the media, a public that was convinced they might be helping catch a MONSTER, a public like Mrs. Kravitz. People who suddenly saw and heard things they never noticed before. People that were positive it meant something. People who SAW what they wanted to see, in order to be helpful, or get on camera, or have a mike shoved in their face so they could be heard on the radio. The MONSTER was the PUBLIC being fed steroids by the MEDIA and it wanted a criminal to eat, NOW ! SO, it was given one.
The sweaty one with a hose in the yard, and porn found in his house. The one that had a MH, where there was evidence children, including Danielle had been in. The one, where there were actually things that could be real proof. Like the blood on his jacket, the blood on the carpet. But, if the children were in it and played there, can be explained away. Just like the hose, the sweat, the Bleach, the trips, the levellers.
To: UCANSEE2
Adult porn was not a problem.....
To: UCANSEE2
Yeeeeeoooooowwwwwww. NO SWEAT?
948
posted on
07/02/2002 5:49:42 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Rattlins
949
posted on
07/02/2002 5:50:40 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Donzerly lights
Boy, the prosecution really didn't answer many questions at all, did they? Going back to the PROSECUTION'S OPENING STATEMENTS, how many of the things they said they would show/prove/answer, did they actually do ? (this question is for anyone that feels qualified to answer or is lucky enough to have a summation of the Pros. Opening statements on hand to post. Man, if you did, you would be a lifesaver.)
To: Jaded
The temperature probably dropped from 55 degrees down to 26 degrees by the time they were in the garage (20 minutes or so)....hey...it could happen. :0)
951
posted on
07/02/2002 5:52:06 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: UCANSEE2
I hope the jury will explain why they arrive at their decision if they are not hung.
To: Rheo
How did Feldman know that info was going to be in Keenes notes?..I am not a lawyer. So take this FWIW.
I believe the detective's notes would be reviewable by the defense as they are considered the same as any physical evidence and are subject to discovery.
To: Rheo
That's why I wonder about the Super-X shell casing. Anything found in the room is contaminated. It's very odd.
954
posted on
07/02/2002 5:53:54 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: UCANSEE2
955
posted on
07/02/2002 5:54:40 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I hope the jury will explain why they arrive at their decision if they are not hung.
One thing you can be sure of. If you are watching CTV, they won't let you hear what the jury says.
To: UCANSEE2
I remember the DA saying they would show *how* DW committed the crime, but I don't remember a lick of evidence pertaining to this.
957
posted on
07/02/2002 5:56:39 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: RnMomof7
Perhaps for most..But I keep coming back to not ONE thing in that house ...NOTHING....not a hair, not a flake of dead skin..NOTHING...that weighs very heavy with me.
Pshaw ! Yeah ... for some naysayers and fencesitters maybe.
But some KNOW how DW did it. In fact, I found a secret evidence photo of DW IN THE ACT ! Below is DW caught by Mrs. Kravitz as he approached the Van Dam home on February 1, 2002. Now we know how DW didn't leave any trace. Begone Nija Dave Theory ! Its HAZMAT DAVE !
958
posted on
07/02/2002 5:57:23 PM PDT
by
pyx
To: UCANSEE2
Don't listen to the rumors ..I've been using thesandiegochannel.com
To: nycgal
Her parents must be so-o-o proud.What is done in the dark comes to the light..her parents, her kids , siblings ,co workers, PTA.....the world now knows her character..or lack of it!
Shame is good......her defense "well it was a swap" ..pathetic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980, 981-989 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson