Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kill Metcalfe voter plan
Butler (PA) Eagle - Letter to editor ^ | 7/1/02 | State Rep. Phyllis Mundy

Posted on 07/01/2002 2:00:24 PM PDT by smokinleroy

Kill Metcalfe voter plan

In the most blatant attempt to disenfranchise voters since the “Jim Crow” laws of the old South, the Republican majority in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives rammed through a late-night measure sponsored by Rep. Daryl Metcalfe of Butler County, by a vote of 100-99, that could prevent thousands of registered Pennsylvanians from voting in the fall election.

If this measure is enacted, Pennsylvania would join South Carolina as having the most restrictive voter identification requirement in the nation.

The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or “valid” photo identification prior to voting at the polls. Examples of valid photo identification cards include driver’s licenses, student identification cards, employee identification cards, U.S. passports, and armed forces identification.

This vote, above all, points to the Republican Party’s desperate attempt to hold on to power in the face of losing control of the governor’s mansion and the state House this coming November.

The Republicans’ raw political power play was transparently evident when they rejected an attempt by Democratic Leader William DeWeese to amend the bill to make the photo ID requirements apply to the July 16 special election to fill the seat of resigned Rep. John Barley of Lancaster.

More important than the politics of this issue is the flagrant disregard the Republican majority showed for one of our most fundamental rights as citizens of the United States and Pennsylvania — the right to vote. Until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1964, many Southern states had “Jim Crow” laws on the books that required literacy tests to suppress the rights of blacks and poor whites to vote.

By requiring a photo identification card, such as a driver’s license or employee card, many Pennsylvanians such as lower-income people and senior citizens who don’t drive would be denied the right to vote.

Moreover, people who simply forget their registration cards or photo IDs would be deprived the opportunity to vote.

Most voters don’t even carry their voter registration cards with them, or have thrown them away. In fact, the back of voter registration cards clearly states that they relate only to date of issue, not proof of the right to vote.

In other words, they specifically say you don’t need them to vote.

The 2000 presidential election provided an unfortunate situation where outdated and unreliable voter equipment disenfranchised thousands of voters and altered the course of the election. This should have been a lesson to all of us.

Yet, the House Republicans compounded these mechanical obstacles to voting by erecting an institutional roadblock. In an era when fewer than half of eligible voters go to the polls, this is an arrogant slap in the face to democracy and the citizens of Pennsylvania.

If the Senate and Gov. Mark Schweiker care at all about our fundamental right to vote, they will reject Senate Bill 824, as passed by the House. As for the House members who voted for the amendment, the very voters they would disenfranchise might disenfranchise them in November.

State Rep. Phyllis Mundy 120th District, Luzerne County


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: voterfraud; whineydemocrats
Imaging the gall of those Republicans expecting people to prove who they are before voting. Simply intollerable! Besides, how could any of us democrats ever win if people are allowed to vote only once?! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!
1 posted on 07/01/2002 2:00:24 PM PDT by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
And NOT one of these voters have a problem showing an ID when giving or cashing a check!!!!

Again, an inane attempt to make Republicans look bad and only ends up making Democrats look ridiculous.
2 posted on 07/01/2002 2:06:43 PM PDT by maeng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
Does this have anything to do with Philadelphi having 1 million voters in a population of 1.3 million and a 100% voter turnout?

Could this be an attempt to cut into the fraudulent votes in the blue counties?
3 posted on 07/01/2002 2:08:24 PM PDT by edger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or “valid” photo identification prior to voting at the polls.
Oh, calamity!!
Jim Crow is back!!
Law and order is out the window!!
The republic is overthrown!! The Caesars rule again!!
Oh, the humanity... the humanity !!

</sarcasm>

Now, back to reality -
Daryl Metcalf is a good guy, he's on our side. And this proposal just gives me more confidence in him.

4 posted on 07/01/2002 2:16:33 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
Once again the Pennsylvania GOPers have shown that they meant what they said about redistricting and reminding the evil donkey just who it is that runs their state. If all GOPers all over the fruited plains did the same this would break the barn dweller's backs over night. Good job Pa, Good job!
5 posted on 07/01/2002 2:22:22 PM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
Guess there is an addendum that prohibts the use of green-cards as a valid form of ID. If I were a rat I'd be pissed too.

EBUCK

6 posted on 07/01/2002 2:26:19 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
Moreover, people who simply forget their registration cards or photo IDs would be deprived the opportunity to vote have to go back home to get them.
7 posted on 07/01/2002 2:30:06 PM PDT by KarlInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or “valid” photo identification prior to voting at the polls. Examples of valid photo identification cards include driver’s licenses, student identification cards, employee identification cards, U.S. passports, and armed forces identification.

OMG, how can we vote 5 or 6 times for our dimocRat politican if we have to prove who we are? Oh woe is me.

One question - why wasn't this posted on DU where it belongs?

8 posted on 07/01/2002 2:37:17 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zip
I'm banned from posting there. One whiff of freeperness and you're history over in that cesspool.
9 posted on 07/01/2002 2:45:40 PM PDT by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Last November I tried voting in another section of my Southeastern PA town, not because I was attempting ot defraud the government, but because I had moved to another part of the town and lived in a new district (and I was a little curious to see if I was going to be "disenfranchised").
I had brought my voter card from the old district and several documents to prove my new location and residency. The elections official was friendly and courteous, but insistant that I go to my old district to vote where I was listed on the rolls.

I went to the other district and voted, but what I learned that day was that elections officials have a bigger part in deciding elections than many people give them credit for, for better or worse. I doubt that this legislation will make any difference if there aren't effective enforcement methods (including following and prosecuting vote fraud violations) put in place.

10 posted on 07/01/2002 2:54:42 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
There is another reason that the Pennsylvania democrats are angry about this. Vote fraud In philadelphia.

All in all Pennsylvania is a conservative State. Very Pro-Gun and Pro-Life, the state has a Republican House, A Republican Senate, A majority of the PA Congressional Delegation is Republican, Both U.S. Senators are Republican (Although one is a RINO) and every statewide official except the auditor general is Republican.

Yet PA voted Gore over Bush, ONLY because of the Philadelphia precents turning out 99.9% of the vote to Gore.

Ed Rendell who is an ultra-liberal beat the more conservative Bob Casey Jr. Even though Casey won all but a few counties in the southeast. Vote fraud in Philly put Rendell over the top.

Republican Mike Fisher will win the race for Gov. in the fall if the democrat scum in Philadelphia cannot vote more than once.

11 posted on 07/01/2002 4:13:44 PM PDT by FF578
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
I'm banned from posting there. One whiff of freeperness and you're history over in that cesspool.

Oh no, you're one of those "gasp" evil conservatives. (Good answer, BTW) zip

12 posted on 07/01/2002 4:14:25 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
This legislation makes me proud to be a Pennsylvanian. Now if only the national Republican Party could collectively grow a pair and push something similar through Congress I might even consider becoming a Republican (been voting almost 30 years but can't bring myself to join a party).

I know Senate republicans led by Kit Bond tried but I don't think the legislation really got anywhere.

13 posted on 07/01/2002 4:34:19 PM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
"requires voters to present either their voter registration cards"

What's so tough about that - California requires it - at least San Diego County does. Only one time I could not find my voter registration card, and they allowed me to use the sample ballot card along with my driver's license. This was for several reasons. I have lived in the same district for 9 years, and the people at the tables could readily identify me as a resident - and agreed to witness that identification. If more districts had such restrictions, we wouldn't have such a problem with voter fraud.
14 posted on 07/01/2002 5:31:55 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
For once I say good for the Republicans. They should have been doing this 10 years ago. I hope they don't get squishy and back down, as they usually do.
15 posted on 07/01/2002 5:34:26 PM PDT by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson