Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rosie: My Mag Is Not Riveting
Mediaweek.Com | 7-1-02 | Lisa Granatstein

Posted on 07/01/2002 11:17:30 AM PDT by Temple Owl

Mediaweek.Com

Rosie: My Mag Is Not Riveting

Lisa Granatstein

JULY 01, 2002 -

The departure last week of Rosie editor Catherine Cavender after little more than a year at the helm has exposed a host of challenges facing the 3.5 million-circulation women's monthly, published by G+J USA and owned jointly by G+J and Rosie O'Donnell. Cavender's exit came seven months after the magazine's publisher was replaced when advertising pages began to head south.

While O'Donnell was not the catalyst for Cavender's departure -- the decision to replace her with Susan Toepfer, deputy managing editor of Time Inc.'s People, was made by G+J president/CEO Dan Brewster -- the actor/comedian is clearly disappointed with the year-old magazine's editorial direction, and with its cover choices in particular.

Launched in May 2001, Rosie set out to transform G+J's failing service title McCall's into an irreverent women's lifestyle magazine filled with "humor and humanity." But the magazine has veered off track, O'Donnell said.

"With the first two or three issues, we were going in the right direction," she said. "Then we just took a left down the safety zone. And I don't want to live there. It's boring. It's not what I do."

The magazine's advertising is back on track under publisher Joan Sheridan LaBarge, who replaced Sharon Summer last November. Through July, Rosie has run 552 ad pages, more than double the total over the same period last year, according to the Mediaweek Monitor. Subscription sales are also said to be on track.

But Rosie's newsstand sales are slumping. After selling between 550,000 and 600,000 copies per issue last year (the May premiere sold 750,000), Rosie has trailed off this year to an average of 400,000. Most of the magazine's covers have featured O'Donnell with celebrity pals such as Gloria Estefan (April), Martha Stewart (June) and Lara Flynn Boyle (July).

"Newsstand sales are worse than planned," Brewster acknowledged. Those sales, which are more profitable than subscriptions, are commonly viewed as a key indicator of an editor's success or failure.

The magazine "doesn't seem to have a lot of energy," said Anita Peterson, print director at OMD USA. "The covers with Rosie in the background were cute in the beginning, but it's gotten a little predictable."

As for any impact following her announcement last spring that she is gay, O'Donnell said that revelation has not been an issue. In fact, all the media attention made her more famous, she said. "I think if I came out and said, 'Look, I got my nipples pierced and I'm joining a separatist movement and all men should rot in hell,' it might have come across a little different."

While O'Donnell said she does not look at newsstand figures, she believes that the covers have not been reflective of the title's mission. That, she added, is about to change.

"I never want to be on another cover," O'Donnell said. "Part of the agreement to do this magazine was that I [would] do only one cover a year, and I have been on the last eight or nine covers. That has been a big problem for me. I hate photo shoots. I would rather have root canal than do a photo shoot. Having me on the cover is against the manifest of what I'm about. I didn't make my fame and fortune by selling me. I made it by observing and celebrating other people."

Following the September issue, O'Donnell said she is done fronting Rosie. "I did a cover with The Sopranos [stars] that's in the can, and that's it," she said.

Perhaps equally important to O'Donnell is the rationale behind the cover subjects. "I didn't want to put Drew Barrymore on the cover, [just] because she had a movie out," O'Donnell said of last November's edition. O'Donnell wanted to lead the issue with an interview she did with Christopher Reeve, in which the paraplegic actor described how he taught his son to ride a bicycle. The cover shot of Reeve "made my knees weak."

O'Donnell is still waiting for her Reeve cover. But the editors "won't do it ... they want me," she said, noting the package has been gathering dust for seven months. Though O'Donnell is a half-owner of Rosie, G+J's editors have final say over the magazine's contents.

"Rosie and Susan together have to work out the content," Brewster said regarding the magazine's future direction. Toepfer, who starts on July 8, will report to Brewster. "Susan has an extraordinarily good interpretation of Rosie's vision, which is tell it like it is, emotional, with humor, and sometimes controversial," the CEO added.

And if O'Donnell chooses not to be on every -- or any -- cover, Brewster said he would be fine with that. "This magazine ultimately has to stand on its own," he said. "And the fact that its voice emanates from the voice and vision of a celebrity does not require her to physically appear on any issue."

O'Donnell, who has had one meeting with Toepfer, said she she is willing to defer to the new editor's expertise. "She knows so much more than I ever will," O'Donnell said.

For her part, Toepfer plans to energize Rosie and give it more focus. "The whole magazine can be made more forceful, energetic and fun," she said. "I really want to rev up the dialogue the magazine has going with readers. And it should also be more entertainment-oriented, because Rosie the personality is an entertainer."

"This magazine is going to be phenomenally successful," O'Donnell said. "It's just the beginning."


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: magazine; rosie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Hopefully Rosie will meet George and Salon.Com in the liberal publication graveyard.
1 posted on 07/01/2002 11:17:30 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Rosie: My Mag(or Mug?) Is Not Riveting
2 posted on 07/01/2002 11:22:57 AM PDT by Zaxis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Part of the reason must be Rosie.
3 posted on 07/01/2002 11:24:28 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
Gee whiz, I'm surprised she get's even 400,000 idiots to buy it...on the other hand, little surprises me these days.
4 posted on 07/01/2002 11:26:41 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
"I think if I came out and said, 'Look, I got my nipples pierced and I'm joining a separatist movement and all men should rot in hell,' it might have come across a little different."

Hey, I might buy that issue just for the shock value alone!

5 posted on 07/01/2002 11:32:05 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
"I never want to be on another cover," O'Donnell said.

Who says prayers aren't answered?

6 posted on 07/01/2002 11:33:45 AM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Rosie, please shut up.
7 posted on 07/01/2002 11:34:59 AM PDT by Bagehot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
I don't see how she can say it's "Not riveting". I tried to read one once, and it felt like someone had shoved a piece of red-hot steel through my head, and was pounding on the end of it with a big hammer.
8 posted on 07/01/2002 11:38:43 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
I am convinced this (wo)man made a pact with Satan. There is no other way to explain her success!
9 posted on 07/01/2002 11:39:32 AM PDT by YourAdHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Its kind of obvious why Rosie is a lesbian.
10 posted on 07/01/2002 11:42:00 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Rosie. Next stop, Obscurity.
Don't think it ain't been fun kid. C-YA
11 posted on 07/01/2002 11:43:25 AM PDT by Pompah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Gee whiz, I'm surprised she get's even 400,000 idiots to buy it...on the other hand, little surprises me these days. My thoughts exactly, wonder if that 3.5 million is cooked just a wee bit?
12 posted on 07/01/2002 11:44:21 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bagehot
You mean SHUT THE @@@ UP
13 posted on 07/01/2002 11:47:42 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
This is interesting. She began that magazine during her "nice" talk show persona phase. Now, she has dumped the show, shouted from the highest peaks her lesbianism, and has been doing a slash and burn standup routine at various people she hates. Not to mention her constant whining about homo adoption. How will that fit in with her rag? I hope she goes full-out lesbo in its content and drives the thing into the ground.
14 posted on 07/01/2002 11:48:23 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
"This magazine is going to be phenomenally successful," O'Donnell said. "It's just the beginning."

ROTFLMAO The rag is toast and everyone in the industry knows it. Nothing like thowing good money after bad. I hope G+J and Rosie spend themselves into bankruptcy on this trash.

15 posted on 07/01/2002 11:50:06 AM PDT by antidisestablishment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
I'm sure the circulation figures are made up out of thin air. Even if there are only 1,000 subscribers, it proves that there are a lot of stupid women out there; I know.....I was once married to one.
16 posted on 07/01/2002 12:00:20 PM PDT by Buckwheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
"With the first two or three issues, we were going in the right direction," she said. "Then we just took a left down the safety zone.

My advice to Rosie: Left was a bad choice. Take a Right.

17 posted on 07/01/2002 12:04:34 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
O'Donnell, who has had one meeting with Toepfer, said she she is willing to defer to the new editor's expertise. "She knows so much more than I ever will," O'Donnell said.

So why don't they just call it "Susan" magazine now?

18 posted on 07/01/2002 12:15:30 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Having me on the cover is against the manifest of what I'm about.

It's also against good taste, since on most covers she looks like she's about to molest the women she's posing with.


19 posted on 07/01/2002 12:35:29 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
How's about a magazine called "Barney?" Do you have any pictures of Barney Frank hugging some Congressional pages?
20 posted on 07/01/2002 12:47:02 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson