Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Left, right and center: Joseph Farah warns fascism is real threat to U.S. liberties
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Monday, July 1, 2002 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 07/01/2002 4:51:32 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Communism will never triumph in America.

Neither will Islamism.

Americans defeated communism in the Cold War, and they will defeat the global jihad of Islam as soon as they realize what's at stake and whom they are actually fighting.

But America's freedoms are hardly safe.

The real threat to our liberties today is from an "ism" you seldom hear much about these days. It's called fascism.

We're not only slouching toward Gomorrah, as Robert Bork has written. We're slouching toward Rome.

To understand what I mean, most people need to rethink their notions about the political spectrum. At the left end, most people agree, you have communism – total government control over the means of production and property. It's at the other end of the spectrum that many get confused.

Ask most left-wingers and they'll suggest that fascism is on the extreme right – 180 degrees from communism. Unh-uh. I've got news for you, friends. Fascism and communism are ideological kissin' cousins. I would place fascism and any other brand of socialism just a few degrees to the right of communism.

Remember, both fascism and socialism mean – to one degree or another – government control of production and distribution. The only thing that distinguishes fascism from socialism in economic theory is how they get that control and how they maintain it.

Fascists realize the government doesn't need to own industry to control it. Through regulation and taxation, fascists know they can achieve the same results without nearly as much work and responsibility.

Fascism, of course, has become a dirty word because of its association with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. But just because none dare speak its name doesn't mean it is dead. Fascism is actually on the rise today precisely because no one recognizes it for what it is and calls a spade a spade.

It is in wide practice today in what we call Communist China. Beijing has not achieved communism. And instead of moving toward the Marxist-Leninist goal, it is moving steadily toward fascism – a hideous blend of state and private partnership. And guess what? The United States is moving in the same direction. Every time you hear officials talk about "public-private partnerships," I want you to understand the translation: fascism, pure and simple.

So what's at the other end of that political spectrum? This surprises a lot of people, but it's really quite logical, if you think about it. If total government control in the form of communism is at the left end, wouldn't it make sense that anarchy – no government control – is at the extreme right?

I envision many libertarians nodding in agreement as they read this. So where do they fit in? Just a few degrees to the left of the anarchists, of course. Conservatives, favoring less government as they do, would find themselves 20 or 30 degrees to the left of the libertarians, while so many people who call themselves liberals today could shake hands with the socialists and fascists to their left.

And that's really why we're facing a serious threat today. You see, most Americans think they hate fascism. They equate it, understandably, with Nazism, Hitler, Mussolini, racism, anti-Semitism and imperialism. But they forget what the definition of fascism is. They no longer recognize it when they see it.

But when you hear about emergency government plans to confiscate property, block transportation and seize control of all communications, as "health" legislation sweeping through the states proposes, please understand that fascism is knocking on the door.

Look at the way we have abdicated our individual liberties in favor of "group rights." That's a fascist concept. Look at the way we demonize certain groups (whether you're talking about smokers or Bible-believing Christians) and elevate others (native Americans and homosexuals come to mind as the new noblemen or chosen people) in our society. That, too, is a fascist concept.

One of the reasons America is moving toward fascism today is because it has lost its constitutional moorings. We're supposed to believe in limited government in the United States. The federal powers are enumerated in the Constitution. But, in recent years, Washington has far exceeded its authority. And very few politicians – Democrats or Republicans – seem to give a darn.

Even worse, most Americans don't even seem to be aware of the problem. Is there any hope? Well, unless we understand what we're up against, it's difficult to fight it. We have to redefine our terms, comprehend the nature of the beast.

That's always a good first step on the road back to freedom.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fascism; islamist
Monday, July 1, 2002

Quote of the Day by Poohbah

1 posted on 07/01/2002 4:51:32 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Remember, both fascism and socialism mean – to one degree or another – government control of production and distribution. The only thing that distinguishes fascism from socialism in economic theory is how they get that control and how they maintain it.

If we could just get THAT through their heads, we'd have made an excellent start.

2 posted on 07/01/2002 4:57:04 AM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamensis
Socialism and War Without End are the two cornerstones of "1984". Big Brother takes care of everyone, and convinces everyone that they have to be oppresed due to an never ending war with either Eurasia or EastAsia, depending on how history has been changed by the Ministry of Truth that week.

We already have rampant Socialism, and the War(s) on (Terror/Drugs/Poverty) has provided the "War Without End". I fear it's not long now because the dying embers of liberty in this country are extinguished at last....
3 posted on 07/01/2002 5:24:25 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Anamensis
The liberal elite who dominate American Academia label the right fascist... but if you exicute thier ideological teachings to thier logical ends you end up at the place they claim to abhore.

I attended a conference, held by the J.C.C. regarding the spread of anti-semitism across Europe, and the speaker focused on Le Pen as an example. I brought to his attention that the attacks against the Jews came from extreme left leaning parties who championed fascist positions and aligned themselves w/ militant muslims. This proposition appeared to make him uncomfortable. American Democrats appear to be having a tough time accepting thier ideological kin are capable of such racism and hate.

4 posted on 07/01/2002 5:26:07 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Moussolini thought fascism was misnamed, don't have the exact quote handy but he said something like " fascism would more correctly be called corporatism as that better defines the relationship between government and business".
5 posted on 07/01/2002 5:48:49 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

6 posted on 07/01/2002 5:51:51 AM PDT by Hail Caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Funny that the JCC speaker would use someone from the "right" as an example, when it is the Left that not only leads and dominates, but makes likely (through their group identity principles) the current anti-Semitism. The reality here does not match the expectation (within the Jewish community).

I'm not really up to speed on Le Pen, many on the so called European "right" would be called leftists in the U.S.

7 posted on 07/01/2002 5:58:50 AM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
I can't figure out how they reconcile calling fascism "right wing" and then turning around and calling anti-government anarchist militia groups in Montana "right wing." If one is total government control and the other is anti-government ... what can they possibly have in common to justify them both being classified as "right wing"?
8 posted on 07/01/2002 10:35:50 AM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Good call on the War Without End....
9 posted on 07/01/2002 10:37:29 AM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson