Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense could pin hopes on insect life
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | June 30, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 06/30/2002 2:28:31 PM PDT by MizSterious

Defense could pin hopes on insect life

By Kristen Green
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

June 30, 2002

In the first four weeks of David Westerfield's murder trial, jurors were schooled in scientific evidence such as blood and DNA, fingerprints and fibers. Now they'll get a crash course in the life cycle of flies.

Westerfield's team of lawyers is expected to launch his defense this week, and lead attorney Steven Feldman has hinted that he will use insect biology to prove 7-year-old Danielle van Dam died after police and reporters began tracking his client's every move. That would mean Westerfield couldn't have killed the child.

"This would be very powerful evidence," said San Diego criminal defense lawyer Michael Pancer. "I can't think of what the state would say if this point were pinned."

Using forensic entomology, scientists can estimate when the girl died by determining the age of insects, generally flies, found on her body.

"They generally get to the body before police do, and they lay eggs," said Bernard Greenberg, professor emeritus of biological sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

The prosecution may call the same expert to the witness stand.

Because of the gag order in the case, no one can provide a timetable for witnesses, clarify facts or discuss strategy.

Feldman has raised the possibility that Danielle may have been killed up to two weeks after her mother reported her missing. Her body was dumped in a brushy rural area in East County.

"You're going to be convinced beyond any doubt that it was impossible, impossible for David Westerfield to have dumped Danielle van Dam in that location," he said on the first day of the trial.

Death's timetable

The jury has heard the prosecution's theory of Danielle's death from Dr. Brian Blackbourne, the county medical examiner. He testified that the girl's body could have been in the weeds along Dehesa Road 10 days to six weeks when it was found Feb. 27.

Forensic entomologists believe they can narrow that window of death, and coroners don't disagree.

Forensic entomology, the use of insects in legal cases, has gotten a boost in mainstream recognition from crime television shows such as CBS' "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation," whose main character frequently uses insects to solve crimes. NBC's "Crossing Jordan" also has an insect expert, nicknamed "Bug," in the cast.

In the real world, the application of forensic entomology to crime investigations has become more common since it was introduced in the United States in the 1970s.

Insect biology has been used in a number of San Diego County cases, including that of Daniel Rodrick, who was convicted in 1997 of killing his wife. An entomologist's testimony helped narrow the time that the victim's body probably was dumped in Pala.

The reason attorneys frequently use entomology is that establishing the time of death is difficult for medical examiners, said San Diego insect expert David Faulkner.

"After 24 to 48 hours, things start to get pretty fuzzy," he said.

A medical examiner relies on three factors to make an assessment, Faulkner said: the amount and distribution of rigor mortis, the change in body temperature and the degree of decomposition. But after several days, rigor mortis dissipates and the corpse assumes the temperature of its environment.

Insects can give more specific information because they have a definitive development period that can be meticulously measured, said Faulkner, who collected insects during Danielle's autopsy and is listed as a potential witness by the prosecution and the defense.

He said his testimony will probably be more useful for the defense, but added the gag order prevents him from discussing his findings outside court.

Faulkner described the collecting of insects from a body as painstaking, similar to the collecting of other scientific evidence.

Generally, he said, forensic entomologists go where a body is found and remove insects from the corpse and areas under and near it. They frequently focus on flies, but also look at other insects, including ants and beetles.

Most of the insects are preserved with alcohol so they can be studied later, Faulkner said. Some of the larvae collected are placed in containers with a piece of liver so they can grow to adulthood, which enables scientists to identify each insect with certainty.

The scientists gather climate data, such as daily temperatures and precipitation measurements, for the time the victim was missing.

Weather is important because a fly's development varies according to conditions. Humidity and daytime highs help forensic entomologists better pinpoint the time flies complete a life cycle.

"The insects will tell you when the body was available to them," Faulkner said.

Fly's life and times

Expert witness Jason Byrd, an associate professor at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Va., said making insects interesting to the jury is difficult.

Flies have a brief life span in warm weather, as short as 21 days. But they can live six months in colder weather.

They are attracted to the corpse's smell, and either lay eggs or deposit larvae. In about a day the eggs hatch into larvae, or maggots, which live on the dead tissue and develop quickly.

Depending on the species and temperature, eggs reach maturity, or the pre-pupal stage, in five to 12 days. From eggs, maggots feed on and then migrate from the body to form the pupal stage, similar to the cocoon stage of the butterfly.

After it leaves the body, a maggot shrinks in size, and the outer covering hardens into what looks like a miniature football. The adult fly develops in that football, called the pupae.

On average, it takes 14 to 24 days for the eggs to reach adult stage, depending on weather.

The longer a body has been left outside, the less precise an entomologist's estimated time of death.

A number of factors can delay insects from reaching a body. For example, burial in a shallow grave, strange weather or wrapping the body in a blanket can delay detection by insects for a few days.

"They'll get there, but they're not going to get there as quickly," said M. Lee Goff, one of eight certified forensic entomologists in the nation and chairman of the forensic sciences department at Chaminade University in Honolulu.

Danielle apparently wasn't wrapped in a blanket or buried in a shallow grave. However, Faulkner has described the weather in February as unusual.

Jurors in the Westerfield trial have heard powerful scientific evidence over the month the prosecution has been presenting its case. But their responsibility is to determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether Westerfield killed the girl, and the defense has not begun.

Witnesses for the prosecution have testified that DNA from a bloodstain on Westerfield's jacket and on the carpet in his motor home matches Danielle's. The victim's DNA was obtained from one of her ribs after the autopsy.

Jurors also have heard that a hair found on a bathmat in Westerfield's motor home could be hers, and DNA tests of a hair found in the motor home's sink drain matched her DNA.

Witnesses also testified that fibers wrapped around the victim's necklace matched fibers found in Westerfield's bedding and laundry, and an expert said two fingerprints found on a cabinet in his motor home were left by her.


Kristen Green: (619) 542-4576;


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: bugman; csi; entomologist; faulkner; kidnapping; molestation; pedophelia; vandam; wefoundyou; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
His first wife? Now talk about a biased witness, that should be a "slam dunk" for Team Feldman.

Dusek.."Hello, Mrs X...are you comfortable?"...

"Now, is it true that DW put on tapes and made you watch?" Answer X: "Yeah, and I called his Mother...she said he was nothing but a "horn dog"! EEEWWWW!"

Cross examination

Feldman: "And did your husband ever suggest you act out those fantacies? (OBJECTION, your honor!) Mudd.."sustained".."Rephrase the question...sigh!"

Feldman: "OK.. did he ever ask you to SWING?!!"

Answer X "AHHH...NO..but, but..."

Feldman. "No more questions"..

sw

21 posted on 07/01/2002 6:08:14 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Your post #21......ROFL !!!

It seems to me as if calling her would be foolish and that's why I suspect it is a rumor.

I have heard that his most recent wife has been supportive of him for the most part, as have the two women he lived with in recent years.

We shall see. Will we know after today's hearings?

22 posted on 07/01/2002 7:07:41 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I don't know if it's his x or not..But we should know sometime later on today. This looks like a good thread to use for the trial tomorrow. It's user friendly...:~)

sw

23 posted on 07/01/2002 7:27:23 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: spectre
This looks like a good thread to use for the trial tomorrow. It's user friendly...:~)

Agreed. Let's go for it.

24 posted on 07/01/2002 7:32:09 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Jaded; RnMomof7; FresnoDA; juzcuz; Politicalmom; All
No trial today..guys. Ping for a no spin zone here tomorrow!

sw

25 posted on 07/01/2002 8:19:52 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; jacquej
Ping your serious friends...tomorrow!

sw

26 posted on 07/01/2002 8:25:26 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Can't wait to hear who the mystery witness might be....if it is not the prosecution calling Faulkner...WHY??..the police usually send the bug info to him...this time he came to the autopsy....why won't the prosecution call him but the defense will.
27 posted on 07/01/2002 8:45:20 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; dread78645; rolling_stone; Karson; sbnsd; BigBobber; John Jamieson; pyx
ping....sorry if duplicate
28 posted on 07/01/2002 8:49:35 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Closed-door sessions set for Monday



SIGNONSANDIEGO

July 1, 2002

altA closed-door hearing is scheduled for today in the murder trial of David Westerfield trial to discuss whether prosecutors will be allowed to call one more witness before concluding their case-in-chief. Westerfield, 50, is charged with kidnapping, murder and misdemeanor possession of child pornography in the disappearance and killing of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam. The self-employed design engineer could get the death penalty if convicted of the felony charges.

Superior Court Judge William Mudd told defense attorney Steven Feldman to be ready to call his first witness tomorrow. The attorney said he could be done with his case by July 15.

Feldman told the judge that he would call a forensic entomologist to the stand if prosecutors don't.

The specialist -- who studies the interaction between insects and cadavers -- could be called on to pinpoint the time of Danielle's death.

In his opening statement, Feldman said the child's nude body could have been placed off a road in Dehesa as late as Feb. 16, a dozen days after his client came under 24-hour surveillance by law enforcement.

Prosecutors theorize that Westerfield killed the 7-year-old and dumped her body at the East County site shortly after she disappeared Feb. 2. Volunteer searchers found the girl's decomposing body on Feb. 27.

Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.

A volunteer handler testified last week that two search dogs alerted several times while sniffing in Westerfield's motorhome four days after the victim was reported missing.

Jim Frazee, who helps the San Diego Sheriff's Department, said his dogs searched the 1997 Southwind motorhome Feb. 6 at a vehicle storage facility on Aero Drive.

The first dog, Hopi, was sent in to search specifically for Danielle's scent, Frazee said. Hopi went into the galley area, the witness said, ``and turned around immediately and came back.''

Frazee explained earlier that Hopi was trained to return to his handler as soon as he found a scent. Hopi was sent back inside several minutes later. ``He jumped up on the sofa on the driver's side,'' Frazee testified, and remained there about five seconds.

His other dog, Cielo, showed considerable interest in an exterior storage compartment behind the passenger-side door, Frazee said.

Cielo, trained to find human remains and bodily fluids, sniffed a shovel and lawn furniture in the compartment for about 15 seconds, according to Frazee.

Frazee said that when he tried to take Cielo to another compartment, the dog sat down and barked, which is his alert signal.

Under cross-examination by defense attorney Robert Boyce, Frazee conceded that he did not report the dogs' reactions because his supervisor was watching them.

Mitchell Holland, the laboratory director of the Bode Technology Group, said a blood stain from the motorhome carpet and a hair found in the bathroom sink were compared to a known sample from the 7-year-old victim.

Regarding the hair, Holland said the chances are ``one in 25 quadrillion'' of selecting a person at random from the Caucasian population who would have the same DNA.

When asked about the blood stain, Holland told prosecutor George ``Woody'' Clarke that the chances were ``one in 660 quadrillion'' of selecting a person at random from the Caucasian population who would have the same DNA.

``Is this an example where samples match?'' Clarke asked.

``Yes, it is,'' Holland answered.

The expert testified that he performed mitochondrial DNA testing -- different from ``nuclear'' DNA testing -- on hairs found on clothing in Westerfield's washing machine, dryer and sheets from his master bedroom in Sabre Springs.

Holland said he could not exclude Danielle van Dam as the donor of the hairs in question.

Police computer expert James Watkins completed his testimony by saying that 85 sexually oriented computer images of underage females were found in Westerfield's home.

The prosecution believes the sexually oriented material involving underage females is evidence of motive.

Watkins said the images were among at least 8,000 deemed pornographic.

Many of the photos were of large-breasted women, the expert said.

He said a total of 100,000 images were found on the computer, but many were simply icons and arrows that make operating systems work.


29 posted on 07/01/2002 9:00:35 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Jˆ< e?ez--if you can't come up with the goods in 90 days, don't arrest the man so soon. They had the porn, and they could have held him on that charge until they made their case.

Agreed ..that is WHY the constitution guaranteed a speedy trial.. Good seeing ya miz

30 posted on 07/01/2002 9:20:30 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spectre
CTV has lost me for good in this trial..It is nice to have a computer that can speak again...on line none of the mindless chatter bias reporting on CTV...
31 posted on 07/01/2002 9:23:09 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
For accurate testimony..read the transcripts (PH & Trial)

Transcripts

32 posted on 07/01/2002 9:30:23 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Thanks for the ping...it's so good to see you here!

I've tried many, many times to get to the refugee board, but my 'puter freezes and won't let me in.

33 posted on 07/01/2002 9:35:56 AM PDT by Beach_Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Seems to me that the only thing the insect study could show is a "no later than" time of death. The fly lifecycles could have begun earlier, and the evidence to that effect could simply have transformed and literally flown away.

I don't think this one's going to get Westerfield out of the woods.

34 posted on 07/01/2002 9:38:21 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; RnMomof7
Rheo, the Prosecution can't really rely on Faulkner's honest testimony. The man has to testify truthfully, and wouldn't compromise his expertise to satisfy the DA.

Look for the DA to place emphasis on him being a "paid" witness for the Defense, assuming he "charges" for his service.

RN, I suck it up on CTV and get past Nancy Grace by pushing the mute button. She's usually done with her melodramatics by the time the trial starts; and a new person takes her place. It's my only source to view the trial with my Web TV.

Getting my errands done, so I'll be caught up for tomorrow! We wait..sw

35 posted on 07/01/2002 9:44:07 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Boy are you ever in for an education...:~)

Stay tuned. sw

36 posted on 07/01/2002 9:46:21 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: spectre
How so?
37 posted on 07/01/2002 9:50:56 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Thanks for the ping, Miz. Good to see you here! Your research and clear wording is valuable to this discussion and I watch for your comments.
38 posted on 07/01/2002 10:23:45 AM PDT by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Lisa Bloom is Gloria Allreds(sp)daughter. I'm also soooo glad I can use my computer to follow the trial. CTV is only good for a pic or two(muted of course!!)
39 posted on 07/01/2002 10:27:03 AM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; MizSterious; All
For reference February Temps
40 posted on 07/01/2002 10:29:58 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson