Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Human Truman Show (The Olsen twins were born 16 years ago. Now they're worth more than you.)
FORTUNE ^ | Monday, July 8, 2002 | Grainger David

Posted on 06/30/2002 10:22:40 AM PDT by jern

Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen's real birthday, as many an 11-year-old girl can tell you, is June 13, 1986, but their first few months on earth don't really count--they didn't accomplish all that much. That changed in October 1986. Selected from a lineup for their nice smiles, the Olsen twins landed a shared part as newborn Michelle Tanner on ABC's Full House. In September 1987, one of them (your guess is as good as ours) was trotted out in front of the camera in the arms of actor John Stamos.

Since then, in their trajectory from the Full House twins to the Olsen twins to Mary-Kate and Ashley to the mary-kateandashley brand, the Olsens, who have just turned 16, have become the most financially successful child stars ever. After spending nearly their entire lives on television, they have become a real-life, human Truman Show. "They are a property now, aside from being people with a heartbeat," says Robert Thorne, 47, an entertainment lawyer who has managed the girls' careers since they were 4 and is now CEO at Dualstar Entertainment, which handles everything Olsen. (The "property" couldn't be interviewed for this story. It had midterms.)

To understand the business of Mary-Kate and Ashley, imagine Oprah Winfrey plus Martha Stewart plus Barbie. Dualstar, which was founded in 1993 to manage the girls' careers, generated $500 million in retail sales last year, mostly from its television and production businesses (Oprah). In 2002, Thorne expects Dualstar to generate almost $1 billion in revenue, boosted by a new fashion-and-accessories line at Wal-Mart (Martha). To date the twins have been television, video, and film stars; editors-in-chief of their own magazine; fashion designers; recording artists; executive producers; authors; videogame heroines; and Mattel models (Barbie).

If you don't have young kids, especially daughters, the Olsens' earning power might be hard to believe. Start with the direct-to-video business. Mary-Kate and Ashley have produced nearly 40 videos, sold more than 30 million copies, and generated $500 million in retail sales, according to Warner Home Video (owned by FORTUNE's parent). For the past two years they have dominated Billboard's Kid Video sales chart, and last year Our Lips Are Sealed was No. 11 in overall video sales--ahead of best-picture nominee Erin Brockovich (No. 14) and The Sopranos: The Complete First Season (No. 15).

The Olsens' first big-screen movie, It Takes Two, in which they starred alongside Steve Guttenberg, earned them $1.6 million, brought in $19 million in ticket sales, and then rallied $75 million in home-video sales, making it one of Warner's bestsellers in the family category. They have sold 29 million books despite being only in sophomore English class, and 1.5 million records even though they are, as one 11-year-old told us, "not very good at singing." They have the No. 2 girls' doll after Barbie and are on TV an average of 35 times per week. Now they sell capri pants. (This matters if you are 9.) In all, they are worth $38 million. Each. "We will out-earn any celebrity in America within two years," Thorne says. "Oprah. Martha. Julia Roberts. Anybody."

Those dollars will come from the wallets and pocketbooks of America's moms and dads. Thanks to their uncanny likeability (see We Hate 'Em! We Love 'Em!), the twins have a lock on the country's daughters. In the fame business, this quality is judged by the so-called Q score (i.e., the percentage of viewers who know a celebrity and have a favorable impression of him or her), and the Olsen's Q score is--and has been since they first emerged on camera--extraordinary. As preschoolers the Olsens had a higher Q rating for their age group than Michael J. Fox on Family Ties, and one rivaling Henry Winkler as the Fonz. "Currently, with the under-12 audience, they are in the top ten of all personalities," says Henry Schafer of Marketing Evaluations/TvQ, which computes the Q scores.

And this audience knows how to spend, or rather, how to get spent on. Tweens--the 27 million kids between the ages of 6 and 12, comprising 10% of the U.S. population--are avid consumers. (The first reference to "tweens," by the way, was in a 1938 Mickey Rooney movie, Love Finds Andy Hardy, when young Judy Garland sings, "I'm too old for toys and I'm too young for boys; I'm in-be-tween.") Last year, America spent $264 billion on the Olsen-addicted generation, according to Dr. James McNeal, president of McNeal & Kids Youth Marketing Consultants. Since the early-'90s, spending on tweens has grown at an annual rate of around 15%, McNeal says--much faster than any other demographic.

But building a business on two little girls is a tricky proposition. For one thing, they grow up. They make announcements like "they want to be movie stars," as Robert Thorne said recently, or that "they are retiring from television," the medium that made them famous. Then there are midterms, and boyfriends, and deciding what to wear to the Vanity Fair Oscars party. And waning Q scores: "It doesn't look like they are broadening their audience beyond kids," say Schafer. "Among teenagers they are very, very slightly above average. Smack-dab in the middle."

To be fair, critics were crying "too old" when the girls were 6. The same proof is almost always trotted out: Few child actors are able to carry their fame into adulthood. For every Jodie Foster, there are countless Barry "Greg Brady" Williamses waiting for their turn on Celebrity Boxing.

Thorne, though, argues that change is a secret of the Olsens' success. New shows, dolls, records, and videogames mimic the lives and concerns of the twins' fans, who are rapidly changing themselves. The girls grow with their audience. Plus, he's there to steer them. "Our business plan is that I decide which direction we are going to go, and we do it," he says.

The retail consultants, at least, are optimistic. "Kids and tweens are aspirational," says Cynthia Cohen, president of Strategic Mindshare. "If [Mary-Kate and Ashley] maintain a good, fashionable product, they might be able to carry it into their 20s. Of course, their success at Wal-Mart is tied to their dominance in the media."

The Olsens' onscreen future is less predictable. Their new straight-to-video release, Getting There, is a guaranteed success, but the twins' next feature film, roughly scheduled for 2003--their first since 1995's It Takes Two--is not. Andy Tennant, who directed the girls in It Takes Two, has doubts. "There are no real [adult] twin movies," he says. "Have you ever seen one? They should just go away and come back as one person. A hybrid. They could call her just 'Kate.' "

Beyond retail and the big screen, the ideas get scattered. Globalization is first. The retail line has already hit Wal-Mart affiliates in Britain, and the girls' videos, television shows, and--eerily--publicity photos are being released there chronologically. After Britain, Thorne says, "I want to go into Mexico, Japan, and China with a package, wrap it up in a bow, and say, 'Here's everything at once, ready to go.' Then it becomes Elvis Presley overnight."

Then there's age expansion. ("I think you can accommodate a 30-year-old and a 3-year-old customer. Maybe they'll co-write a book for adults," Thorne says.) And gender expansion. ("Giorgio Armani and Donna Karan sell to both men and women.") Thorne even hired a reporter who had suggested a Mary-Kate and Ashley marriage magazine when the twins hit their late 20s.

It sounds ludicrous, but Thorne has been right before. The twins, Dualstar, and Thorne will continue to be successful at least until the girls head off to college. By then Thorne will have had time to put his next move in place. (Mary-Kate and Ashley as Doublemint Twins?) "Someday they're going to have me come to Harvard Business School to explain how this works," Thorne says. The speech to MBAs might begin something like this: Get 'em while they're young.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ashley; marykate; olsentwins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2002 10:22:40 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jern
My 6-yr. old neice is crazy about these two. But now that their videos and T.V. shows have become borderline sexual, her mom doesn't let her watch them all anymore, which leads to some noisy tantrums.
2 posted on 06/30/2002 10:29:06 AM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Man, my daughter is three months older than these girls........she's not good at bringing in an income, but she sure can spend.................lol
3 posted on 06/30/2002 10:34:50 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Yeah, but how many shares if IMClone have they unloaded? ;-)
4 posted on 06/30/2002 10:46:09 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
I saw a show some time ago and these girls each have their own personal assistant (from what I saw, this is someone who follows them around agreeing with everything they say) The girls seem to be calling ALL the shots with their careers. Must be nice to be them ... :)
5 posted on 06/30/2002 10:47:19 AM PDT by TxBec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
But now that their videos and T.V. shows have become borderline sexual, her mom doesn't let her watch them all anymore, which leads to some noisy tantrums.

Chewy also stops the tantrums.

6 posted on 06/30/2002 10:52:05 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
90% of letches and sexual predators surveyed by the Clinton Institute for Sexual Studies are waiting them to turn 18 and legal.
7 posted on 06/30/2002 11:07:58 AM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
The Olsen twins are one of many reasons I'm glad my daughter is only 3 - by the time she's old enough to be interested in stuff like this, their star should be pretty well faded. Not that this'll spare me in the long run - somewhere out there right now is the next precocious little snot, just waiting to be discovered by some agent/promoter with dollar signs in his eyes... :)
8 posted on 06/30/2002 11:16:22 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: general_re
by the time she's old enough to be interested in stuff like this,

Stuff like what? Good sweet innocent entertainment for kids?

9 posted on 06/30/2002 11:29:52 AM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Once the CA$H flow ends, PLAYBOY will make them an offer.
10 posted on 06/30/2002 11:31:53 AM PDT by jaz.357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
One man's "good sweet innocent entertainment" is another man's "schmaltzy, saccharine, cynical attempt to separate the nation's parents from their hard-earned money" ;)
11 posted on 06/30/2002 11:42:02 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jaz.357; jern
   Once the CA$H flow ends, PLAYBOY will make them an offer.

Doubtlessly. Not to mention that since they're approaching 18, I'd bet they'll get offers from porno producers as well.

For these reasons, I don't care what their net worth is, in a way I feel sorry for them. It's bad enough living in a parent's or sibling's shadow (Donny & Marie Osmond's brothers in the 70s comes to mind) but can you imagine being obscured by your own childhood??!? Ouch.

Cases in point: I felt (figuratively) nauseous watching Williams on Celebrity Boxing. I cringe when I see David Cassidy on VH-1 (it's always something about the Partridge years. I mean, the guy's still alive, isn't he??).

As for the headline,
   (The Olsen twins were born 16 years ago. Now they're worth more than you.)

I hate to say it, I'm no pauper, but that's still old news by about 14 years!!

12 posted on 06/30/2002 12:03:30 PM PDT by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jern
From the article byline:
   Monday, July 8, 2002

I know Free Republic is cutting edge, but now we're getting news & analysis from eight days into the future! Wicked!!

13 posted on 06/30/2002 12:06:22 PM PDT by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Few child actors are able to carry their fame into adulthood.

Shirley Temple became the U.S. ambassador to Ghana. Any guesses as to what qualified her for that post, other than she was Bill "Bojangles" Robinson's dancing partner?

14 posted on 06/30/2002 12:13:20 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike-o-Matic
but now we're getting news & analysis from eight days into the future! Wicked!!

FORTUNE Teller magazine

15 posted on 06/30/2002 12:16:36 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jaz.357
Exactly what I was thinking. Every time I look at these girls I see them posing for Playboy within 10 years and in and out of drug rehab in adulthood. Sad. I hope I'm wrong.
16 posted on 06/30/2002 12:19:15 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jern
Two of the absolutely most untalented people to ever grace a stage, they are the perfect examples of folks who are famous for being famous. They need to thank their agent and the luck of the draw, otherwise they'd be pumping softserve at a Dairy Queen instead of riding around in limos.

My cat has more charm, and I don't even have a cat.

17 posted on 06/30/2002 12:28:59 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Never heard of them.
18 posted on 06/30/2002 2:07:05 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Actually, you should REALLY be glad your daughter isn't old enough to be part of the "Brittany Spears" sensation........ she makes me ill.........
19 posted on 06/30/2002 2:08:37 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
"Exactly what I was thinking. Every time I look at these girls I see them posing for Playboy within 10 years and in and out of drug rehab in adulthood. Sad. I hope I'm wrong."

Never happen. Why? Because when you're worth $38 mil, the best Playboy and any others can come up with is chicken feed !

For that matter, why should they attempt to do anything else in show business as a team, when almost any vehicle would be trading on their popularity?

I see them continuing to make videos until 18, and then manage the francise for at least another 10. As a parent, at least it's something my kid can watch that's clean and hip enough to keep her interested.

20 posted on 06/30/2002 2:33:26 PM PDT by Not_Who_U_Think
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson