Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLurker
Your response to post #379 was a bit more indicative of someone who was espousing the view that anyone concerned about this was a "envirowacky animals rights" type person, as evidenced in post #380. I find it interesting that now you claim you were simply pointing out that these people don't want to eat our dogs.

Nice try at inventing a contradition that isn't there.

The last time I saw this blend of animal rights and xenophobia, it was something someone posted from the British National Party.

You're the one that summoned the moderator.

I "summoned" them to rub their weasly noses in their blatent hypocrisy.

Hey mods: up yours.

I simply don't like being portrayed as a cross between a "klansman and a tree-hugger", and I told you so in so many words.

Well, simply stop being a cross between a Klansman and a tree-hugger, and I'll stop calling you one.

456 posted on 07/01/2002 9:27:48 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage
Nice try at inventing a contradition that isn't there.

No inventing necessary. You were attacking me for trying to speak out against this barbarian practice. Since you defend these acts of cruelty with unusual zeal, I assume you would partake of such sadistic behaviour yourself.

The last time I saw this blend of animal rights and xenophobia, it was something someone posted from the British National Party.

Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

I "summoned" them to rub their weasly noses in their blatent hypocrisy.

No, I'd say you ran to the 'Admin Nanny' because you had lost the argument and are a sore loser.

Well, simply stop being a cross between a Klansman and a tree-hugger, and I'll stop calling you one.

I speak out against the inhuman treatment of animals, so that makes me a "klansman"?

Is that what you do when you see that you're losing an argument, call people "tree huggers" and "klansmen" in order to divert the discussion into a totally unrelated direction?

If anything pal, you're the one with a chip on his shoulder, and I would not be the least bit surprised to see you dress up with a sheet over your head out there burning crosses on someone's front lawn. The hatred and sheer lack of compassion that you have displayed here on this thread speaks volumes of your character. And your "envirowacky" comments demonstrate your attitude towards not only our land, but our children who would be forced to ingest the poisons you would surely allow to be dumped into the environment in order for a few wealthy individuals to enhance their already astronomical wealth.

I'm sure you're not much for hugs, and that may be your problem, you didn't get enough of them when you were a young lad. Is that why you're unleashing your venom against the world, because your mommy didn't give you enough hugs when you were young?

BTW, I've never hugged a tree, but have hugged my dog. Maybe that's what you need, a puppy! Perhaps that would change your disposition. However, knowing you, more than likely you'd kick it to death so you could have a little dog stew for supper. That would not surprise me in the least, as you've demonstrated strong support for such deviant behavior throughout this thread.

459 posted on 07/02/2002 4:56:46 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson