No inventing necessary. You were attacking me for trying to speak out against this barbarian practice. Since you defend these acts of cruelty with unusual zeal, I assume you would partake of such sadistic behaviour yourself.
The last time I saw this blend of animal rights and xenophobia, it was something someone posted from the British National Party.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
I "summoned" them to rub their weasly noses in their blatent hypocrisy.
No, I'd say you ran to the 'Admin Nanny' because you had lost the argument and are a sore loser.
Well, simply stop being a cross between a Klansman and a tree-hugger, and I'll stop calling you one.
I speak out against the inhuman treatment of animals, so that makes me a "klansman"?
Is that what you do when you see that you're losing an argument, call people "tree huggers" and "klansmen" in order to divert the discussion into a totally unrelated direction?
If anything pal, you're the one with a chip on his shoulder, and I would not be the least bit surprised to see you dress up with a sheet over your head out there burning crosses on someone's front lawn. The hatred and sheer lack of compassion that you have displayed here on this thread speaks volumes of your character. And your "envirowacky" comments demonstrate your attitude towards not only our land, but our children who would be forced to ingest the poisons you would surely allow to be dumped into the environment in order for a few wealthy individuals to enhance their already astronomical wealth.
I'm sure you're not much for hugs, and that may be your problem, you didn't get enough of them when you were a young lad. Is that why you're unleashing your venom against the world, because your mommy didn't give you enough hugs when you were young?
BTW, I've never hugged a tree, but have hugged my dog. Maybe that's what you need, a puppy! Perhaps that would change your disposition. However, knowing you, more than likely you'd kick it to death so you could have a little dog stew for supper. That would not surprise me in the least, as you've demonstrated strong support for such deviant behavior throughout this thread.
You obviously have a tenuous grasp on literacy when it would get in the way of your outrage. I have had two points: 1) there is nothing inherently wrong with eating dogmeat, and 2) the stuff about beating them to death is probably from people like you, and hence unreliable. What do I mean by "people like you"? You're more interesting in being outraged at people than having any clue about reality.
Since you defend these acts of cruelty with unusual zeal, I assume you would partake of such sadistic behaviour yourself.
Well now, go read my first comment on this thread.
If you can't come up with anything better than "if you don't think eating dog is bad and doubt my 'yellow' journalism, it must be because you like beating dogs!" you've got a weak mind and a disposition toward cheap outrage. Which, of course, further discounts everything you've said here.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
If I'd asked you, say, how you became a xenophobe, you might have a point. But I didn't ask a loaded question, did I? No, I made a statement of fact, namely, "The last time I saw this blend of animal rights and xenophobia, it was something someone posted from the British National Party."
No, I'd say you ran to the 'Admin Nanny' because you had lost the argument and are a sore loser.
You have two assumptions here. One is that I lost, which is pure arrogance on your part. Flinging around accusations that the other guy likes beating dogs does not constitute victory. It shows your limitations.
The other is that I trust the moderators. You should be at least warned for the stuff you've done here, but the moderators are blind, stupid, and biassed. There was a good chance I'd be banned, almost certainly for one of my more innocuous comments. I suppose it makes them feel powerful to call a non-attack an attack, and pull it so no one can see what lying snakes they are. And they leave real attacks in place, on the same thread.
I speak out against the inhuman treatment of animals, so that makes me a "klansman"?
The fact that you and 4freedom have worked yourselves into a full-fledged hatred for Asians over this is why I compare you to Klansmen. Although I'd guess that should probably be Klanswomen.
Is that what you do when you see that you're losing an argument, call people "tree huggers" and "klansmen" in order to divert the discussion into a totally unrelated direction?
This from the person who brought out the "you must like torturing dogs" stuff. At best you're a pot calling the kettle black.
And your "envirowacky" comments demonstrate your attitude towards not only our land, but our children who would be forced to ingest the poisons you would surely allow to be dumped into the environment in order for a few wealthy individuals to enhance their already astronomical wealth.
So you're also into class warfare, I see. Better make that a "Marxist tree-hugging Klansman".