Skip to comments.
Microsoft's Palladium project and the Wild West mentality on the Internet
Copyright 2002 - World Tech Tribune.com ^
| June 28, 2002
| Scott McCollum
Posted on 06/28/2002 11:53:26 AM PDT by Scott McCollum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: Scott McCollum
uh-huh...and those gated communities usually have homeowners associations that are more controlling than anything else..No thank you, I'll stick to the wild west if you don't mind..
To: unix
You sound like some sort of subversive, left-wing, libertarian, open source cultist.
You need to be closely watched. This is why we need Palladium; to track the internet activities of pinko-commies like you.
;^)
3
posted on
06/28/2002 12:04:36 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
It has often been said that the Internet is similar to the Wild West and should be kept that way, because that was a time were people (mostly men with guns) were truly free to roam and explore.
BARF ALERT.
4
posted on
06/28/2002 12:10:23 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
To: Scott McCollum
The real purpose of Palladium is to lock out Open Source/Linux/GPL and kill them.
Microsoft Good, Competition Bad.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You also sound supicious to me. You need to be monitored. It should be a crime to use a non-Palladium system; even if it's not connected to the internet. You open source cultists are dangerous.
6
posted on
06/28/2002 12:13:24 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
To: Scott McCollum
The outcry against Palladium doesnt really stem from a concern about your privacy, but more from a vocal minority who wish to impose their anarchistic schemes onto us under the guise of freedom and liberty. Anyone who thinks "freedom" and "liberty" are important is deranged.
Orwell was right. Freedom is slavery.
To: Scott McCollum
It has often been said that the Internet is similar to the Wild West and should be kept that way, because that was a time were people (mostly men with guns) were truly free to roam and explore. Back to your DUmpster, troll.
8
posted on
06/28/2002 12:30:46 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: Scott McCollum
From reading the article, this appears to be another case of wanting to have it both ways..the same people who screamed about internet security and the vulnerability of home pc's to hackers are now screaming because Microsoft is going to try and make it as hard as possible for an intruder to get information from web transactions. The only way to create this kind of security is to integrate software and hardware on both ends. It is a massive project, and it appears that Microsoft is going to spend billions to develop this standard.
To: stylin_geek
Nonsense; there are plenty of ways to prevent intruders from stealing information without giving Billgatus of Borg a veto at the hardware level over which software can run on your system.
10
posted on
06/28/2002 12:52:11 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: unix
I agree. Yee-Haw!!
11
posted on
06/28/2002 1:01:05 PM PDT
by
SoDak
To: Redcloak
ROFLMAO....
YOU'LL NEVER GET ME FACIST!!!!
To: steve-b
I agree.
13
posted on
06/28/2002 1:30:05 PM PDT
by
DrDavid
To: Scott McCollum
Like all of Microsofts software, Palladium will be hacked while it's still in the Beta stage.
To: Scott McCollum
I said this on another thread about Palladium and it bears repeating:
I've been writing a piece of music and recorded a draft of it about a week ago onto my Win2000 machine with SoundForge. I then converted it to .mp3 with AudioCatalyst and uploaded it to my website.
Yesterday I downloaded it on my personal laptop at work, so I could hear it through different speakers. When I opened it with Media Player 7, the digital media security kernel kicked in and brought up a dialog box stating that I was opening a piece of music "recorded from a CD" and asking me if I wanted "migrate my license" and warning me about copyright infringements.
ON MY OWN MUSIC AND ON MY OWN MACHINES.
If such a simple security concept is already that screwed up, how does MS think it's going to credibly expand in that area? Palladium will just continue to prove that MS has expanded into markets it can't competently code in.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What do you mean?
What about Microsoft's right to compete? Unless it can get all of the major chip manufacturers to agree with it to lock out Linux/GPL, it won't be able to compete. Their stuff doesn't cost anything and its better.
What could be less American than free software?
To: Psycho_Bunny
..Palladium will be hacked while it's still in the Beta stage. Good! Hack the crap out of it during beta, just don't releae a product of beta quality.
To: Psycho_Bunny
Don't you mean that it will be distributed while it's still in beta??
18
posted on
06/28/2002 2:02:05 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
To: Wisconsin
What could be less American than free software? Centrally-planned software.
19
posted on
06/28/2002 2:07:42 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: Wisconsin
What could be less American than free software? Free healthcare?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson