Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Domestic Abusers Able to Buy Guns
Jointogether.com ^ | 6/26/02

Posted on 06/27/2002 6:33:36 AM PDT by technochick99

A new congressional study shows that an estimated 3,000 people with domestic-violence convictions were able to buy firearms between 1998 and 2001, because the FBI was unable to complete background checks before the sales went through, the Washington Post reported June 26.

According to a draft report by the General Accounting Office (GAO), federal authorities had to retrieve guns from domestic abusers and more than 8,000 other felons because they were wrongly allowed to purchase the weapons.

"The weapon can be used in a homicide or to terrorize battered women and their children," said Lynn Rosenthal, executive director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. "These cases are falling through the cracks."

According to the report, the purchases were allowed because of haphazard recordkeeping and other problems with the National Instant Check System (NICS).

Under federal law, FBI authorities have three days to perform a criminal-background check on gun applicants. If the check is not completed in time, the purchase goes through.

Justice Department officials said the NICS has been effective in identifying gun applicants with felony convictions, restraining orders, and other serious criminal matters. But the system falters when identifying misdemeanor domestic-abuse convictions or findings of mental illness because they are usually recorded on paper, and require extensive research to locate.

"We acknowledge that state laws and procedures are currently inadequate to allow the NICS to function correctly to keep guns out of the hands of those who commit crimes of domestic violence," said a Justice Department official. "It's clear that state records are incomplete in this area, and we are directing resources to try and correct the problem."

The GAO study recommended that federal authorities be given as many as 30 days to conduct background checks and to research questionable cases. But some members Congress want to reduce the background check time to 24 hours.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; domesticviolence; guncontrol

1 posted on 06/27/2002 6:33:36 AM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list


2 posted on 06/27/2002 6:40:02 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
federal authorities had to retrieve guns from domestic abusers and more than 8,000 other felons because they were wrongly allowed to purchase the weapons. [...] But the system falters when identifying misdemeanor domestic-abuse convictions

Yet another lie, among thousands of lies, from the gun grabbers. The domestic abusers in question aren't felons, they're misdemeanants. And the author of this piece even admits it later. Truth to a gun grabber is like garlic to a vampire.

3 posted on 06/27/2002 6:59:20 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Was it a case where the person had a criminal record for assault or was it a case where a restraining order was reported? I'm going to go out on a limb and write that this was no more than a divorced person being told by their lawyer that it was better for their side to file a restraining order and the other person later bought a gun.
4 posted on 06/27/2002 7:00:58 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
"According to a draft report by the General Accounting Office (GAO), federal authorities had to retrieve guns from domestic abusers and more than 8,000 other felons because they were wrongly allowed to purchase the weapons." "The weapon can be used in a homicide or to terrorize battered women and their children," said Lynn Rosenthal, executive director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. "These cases are falling through the cracks."

It's apparent that the FBI doesn't want the National Instatnt Check System to work, so they are purposely trying to see that NICS doesn't work. Either that or the FBI is F***ed up beyond all recognition (FUBAR)! If NICS is a failure, then the FBI will get their Gestapo database of all firearms transactions back.

5 posted on 06/27/2002 7:15:07 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
If half the crap in that article were based on fact and I were a woman in an abusive situation, I'd just get myself armed and forget all that other crap. But that makes too much sense since the nanny-state gov't is supposed to 'protect' everyone.

I was a victim of a false domestic violence charge which was later dropped since no such thing occured. (The judge didn't even believe her but dropped the charge anyway thank God.) The officer actually arrested me since my girlfriend wouldn't press charges because she and I were merely yelling and a few items got thrown at walls. She didn't even live with me she was only visiting.

To think I could possibly lose a Constitutional right over a bogus situation like that is just plain scary.

Registration leads to confiscation.

6 posted on 06/27/2002 7:28:34 AM PDT by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
To think I could possibly lose a Constitutional right over a bogus situation like that is just plain scary.

Happens all the time.

7 posted on 06/27/2002 8:38:20 AM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
And I believe that restraining orders are typically filed in divorce cases regardless of the situation.
8 posted on 06/27/2002 9:37:02 AM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
The GAO study recommended that federal authorities be given as many as 30 days to conduct background checks and to research questionable cases.

Hey, that's "sensible," isn't it? Or 60...or 180...

I note that this "study" doesn't address the number of those purchasers who went on to illegally employ those weapons, although surely that information is not difficult to gather. One wonders why not...well, no, one doesn't...

9 posted on 06/27/2002 9:42:50 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
This article assumes all guns are purchased from FFLs.
10 posted on 06/27/2002 9:56:18 AM PDT by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
bump
11 posted on 06/27/2002 1:38:49 PM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
LOL! That could be taken the wrong way, sweetie!
12 posted on 06/27/2002 2:52:52 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
A couple of weeks ago on a liberal website, a freedom hater made the SOP false claim that "thousands of children were accidentially killed with firearms every year". He was absolutely silent when I provided him with the Center for Disease Control link that showed a total of 180 kids (1-16) nationwide were accidentally killed in 1999.
13 posted on 06/27/2002 7:18:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson