BUSH CAVES IN TO TERRORISM READY TO ANNOUNCE PROVISIONAL PALI STATE (Klayman is Making Sense?)

JW ^ | 06-19-2002 | COMMENTARY BY LARRY KLAYMAN

[RedBloodedAmerican]

One of Bin Laden’s Goals Achieved Through Attacks of September 11TH

(Washington, DC) All of the major news media organizations have reported within the last 24 hours that President Bush is on the verge of formally announcing yet a new Middle East policy, calling for the creation of a provisional Palestinian state, with final borders drawn and full autonomy established within a three year period. Reports claim that President Bush hopes the plan for the new Palestinian state will be adopted at a Middle East peace summit tentatively planned for September. Bush’s formal announcement has been delayed by yet another Palestinian suicide bombing that killed 19 Israelis on Tuesday in Jerusalem.

President Bush’s new policy is a major victory for the Islamist terrorists that attacked our nation on September 11th, and continue to attack our Israeli allies on an almost daily basis. Despite an enormous amount of political rhetoric and posturing, President Bush has conceded to terrorist demands, perhaps to also placate Arab/American oil interests in the region. Terrorists have effectively succeeded in “murdering their way” to concessions from the American government. One of Osama bin Laden’s and his al Qaeda organization’s strategic objectives has been achieved. Yassir Arafat and his murderous thug cohorts will achieve “statehood” thanks to President Bush.

“The message of President Bush and the Bush Administration is that you can kill almost 3,000 Americans and get what you want, a Palestinian state. This neither furthers the war against terrorism nor enhances U.S. respect and credibility internationally. To the contrary, the bludgeoning of Israel into acceding to a provisional Palestinian state not only creates a fait accompli, but encourages more terrorism,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

[Squantos]

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Stay Safe !

[Howlin]

Ah, to be RIGHT, you have to actually say somethign that is going to happen correctly.

He did not.

BTW, your RANDOM CAPS GENERATOR needs some retooling, if you have one; it's not very RANDOM, or don't you get the point of it?

[RISU]

Mr. Bush is the President of the United States of America.

How can he "announce"the creation of a state?, provisional or otherwise.

I like Bush but is there no limit to egomania?

[RedBloodedAmerican]

If he is Chari and counsel, then why is he writing columns giving his "expert opinion" on issues he knows nothing about (which is what you are saying, right?)

[Howlin]

We know why people are invited onto TV shows; what we want to know is why is Larry Klayman putting himself forward as a foreign policy expert.

Where did he pick that up? College course?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"You're bringing an argument from another thread over to this one. Totally bad form."

Please put a sock in it Howlin and cut the lectures. Lest you forget the last tiff we had, that YOU had brought up IRRELEVANTLY in a certain thread.

Second point: Larry Klayman has never given himself the label of a Foreign Policy Expert. Rather, he was invited onto those TV programs as a guest commentator on Middle East Foreign Policy, which is a far cry from being given the label of an expert.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

You said on an earlier thread you began following them when you were 11. I guess maybe you learned to do the math between then and now. Good job!

[Howlin]

Question: Has Larry Klayman ever actually claimed to be an expert in Middle East Foreign Policy?

Ah, if he isn't putting himself forward as a foreign polciy expert, why did he put this on his web site?

I love it that he came out of the gate too early once again -- trying to get in front of the parade and look like he knows something -- and was completely dead wrong about what Bush was going to say!

[Howlin]

Of course he has. Please try not to insult the rest of us who can actually read and understand the English language.

Is this article Larry Klayman's words or not? If so, and he's not putting himself forward as a foreign policy expert, why did he write it?

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Can you figure this one out?

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Now you did it. She is going to hit abuse on you for calling Liarry on the carpet. Oh boy.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

4th from the right. Much closer to the left *cough*

[Howlin]

I like the category you posted this under.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Nothing like getting the facts wrong again, I never stated that.

I was referring to the time when Bill Clinton fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys; it had nothing to do with me starting to follow Judicial Watch.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I believe that a person can articulately put forth their opinion on Middle East Foreign Policy without being considered an expert in the area.

Howlin,

The belief that only known experts can be able to accurately for forth a valid opinion is a purely elitist notion and one that I would not support.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Oh, riiiighhhhttt...it was the firing of the Attorneys! Not anyhing to do with JW!

What really irks me about his group is when they come to my door on weekends and says if I am not one of the 144,000 to join him, something realy bad will happen to me.

Thanks for setting me straight on your truthfulness.

[Dave S]

yep

[RedBloodedAmerican]

But I thought thats whay YOU said. YOU said he is no expert, yet his comments in this article are more than your EVERYDAY commentator on the SUBJECT.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"What really irks me about his group is when they come to my door on weekends and says if I am not one of the 144,000 to join him, something realy bad will happen to me."

You are truly confusing. What does being a Jehovah Witness (which I am not) have to do with this thread?

[Dog Gone]

You guys seem more content to bash Larry Klayman than to actually debate the message that he was trying to get out to the media and general public.

It's because his message is so predictable. If Bush is FOR something, Larry is AGAINST it.

This foreign policy position of his has absolutely nothing to do with so-called objectives of Judicial Watch. Is he planning on suing Bush for his speech?

All he is doing is posturing in order to remind contributors that he's opposed to this Administration.