You're not making suggestions on future decisions, you are questioning the validity of decisions already made. Nope. I only suggested in this thread that there are other good choices, some that might be better than the old ASP code.
The defensiveness of MS-only folks is amazing.
Any suggestion on any thread that anyone, anywhere does anything better than MS will recieve a scathing insult from Mr. B2k. Clearly MS is to be worshiped.
I've been very pro-.NET on this thread. Just not pro-.NET enough for the evangelists, who view any suggestion that MS is not the very best at everything as an insult.
That is very hard to imagine, and can't make for good developers. A good developer has to keep an open mind about technology.
No. When you say .Net IS NOT ready for prime time, when you say that no HONEST assesment can conclude otherwise you are questioning the integrity of people that ARE using it in prime time and validity of THEIR assesment that it's ready. You're not making suggestions. You can't make suggestions about decisions that are already made, it's not physically possible. The decision is already made, suggestion time is over. It's now criticism time and you're heavy on that. And when you criticize decisions with no actual knowledge of how and why it was made that's insulting.