Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr
Because it wasn't. You're the only person on this thread that didn't understand what he said. If the majority of people hadn't understood him you'd be correct. But the majority understood him fine. That means the problem lies not with the statement but with the listener.
131 posted on 06/25/2002 10:51:10 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
If the majority of people hadn't understood him you'd be correct. But the majority understood him fine.

Um, 2 people "understood" him, and both of those would argue the exact opposite of *anything* I said.

B2k even follows me to other, non-MS threads, taking the opposite side just to disagree with me.

In fact, it seems clear that everyone else took Jeeves' first comment at face value and believed it. I was the only one to ask for clarification. And it turned out I was right to.

You don't have to admit your error. I understand. It's kind of like thinking that any suggestion MS isn't perfect is an "insult".

Some people just have issues.

134 posted on 06/25/2002 10:59:24 AM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson