[knighthawk]

Take it from some one who lives in the Netherlands, hte worlds leading multicultural country in the world.

We just voted the left-wing pro-multiculturalists out of the government in a landslide.

Certain people just aren't interested in fitting in:

Fanatical imams: group preaches hatred in Dutch mosques
'Moderate' Islam in the Netherlands: The Trukish organization Milli Görüs

Group-sexual assault in swimmingpool (in the Netherlands)
Group-rape of girl cover up attempt uncovered in Holland
Group-rape of girl cover up in Holland - an update

[knighthawk]

Ping

[muawiyah]

This used to be the standard doctrine concerning immigrants from Italy and Greece. You could find it in every highschool history textbook in the nation.

The earlier Northern and Western European immigrants were described as trustworthy and honest folk who intended to stay and make the United States great. The Italians and Greeks were described as interested only in making a lot of money and going back home to "live it up". Italians were targeted as being particularly obnoxious because they refused to learn English!

Were these charges true?

[I. M. Trenchant]

Has the proportion of 'disloyal' individuals among the immigrant groups who have entered North America during the past half century increased, decreased or remained about the same ? During the first half of the 20th century, there were well-known exemplars of immigrant groups who were widely portrayed as having been strongly opposed to the U.S. government. The best-known paradigms for extremism and disloyalty to the U.S. in earlier times (e.g., Sacco & Vanzetti, the Rosenbergs, the Greenglasses, Harry Gold) were immigrant and/or resident Americans, the best-known paradigms in recent times (e.g., The Unabomber, Timothy McVeigh) were resident, not immigrant Americans and they were not remotely connected to Islamic extremism, whereas the best-known paradigms of Islamic extremism against the U.S. (e.g.Bin Laden, Atta and tens of others) have not been immigrant Americans but foreign nationals.

[FreedomPoster]

Great post. Bump! I wish we would vote to limit immigration and make value to the host country the key criterion for letting foreigners into our country. The policy now is "whoever can manage to scamper across, gets to".

[facedown]

In many ways he resembled an invader more than a settler or a refugee.

Exactly what they are.

[Ohioan]

When we retreated from the principle that immigration should serve the interests of the host country first, our misguided liberalism opened a Pandora's box.

I wish that that "liberalism" had only been misguided. The guides, unfortunately, who were themselves from the "Liberal" academic community, knew exactly where they were guiding their flocks. This has all been part of a Fabian movement for a new world order, based upon the pretense of an undifferentiated humanity. It is a very cruel and neurotic pursuit that does not gain greater credibility because those who push it like to fancy that they have some sort of moral high ground.

For more on the mindset that seeks to break down clear senses of National identity, see Myths and Myth Makers in American "Higher" Education. (Some of the names will be very familiar to those who have graduated from American colleges over the past half century.)

For a serious look at how immigration policy should be determined in a rational way, see Immigration & The American Future.

What is really sad about the "misguided liberals," is that we all lose, when they prevail. In place of a world where different peoples really learn to live in a peace based upon traditional borders and mutual respect, they offer only a world based upon repression of normal instincts, denial of reason and love, and closeted hate and resentment. We need to take back the West from the neurotics who in their fear of reality, betray it.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

[Coleus]

bump