Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors Clear Clintons in Clemency of 4 Hasidic Men
New York Times ^ | Friday, June 21, 2002 | By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

Posted on 06/20/2002 10:43:42 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

June 21, 2002

Prosecutors Clear Clintons in Clemency of 4 Hasidic Men

By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

Federal prosecutors said yesterday that no criminal wrongdoing was committed when President Bill Clinton commuted the sentences of four swindlers from a Hasidic enclave in New York State that voted overwhelmingly for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.

James B. Comey, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, said in a two-sentence statement that he had closed his investigation of clemency granted to the four men from New Square, N.Y.

Mr. Comey said he would continue the investigation into the more than 170 other pardons and clemencies Mr. Clinton granted on his last day of office, including the one that has drawn the most ire: a pardon for the financier Marc Rich, a commodities trader who fled the country in 1983.

The New Square case also drew attention because of its mix of the Clintons, New York ethnic politics and suggestions of vote-trading.

The four men, convicted of bilking the state and federal government of tens of millions of dollars, were prominent members of New Square, a reclusive Rockland County village. The village leaders' aggressive courting of the president and Mrs. Clinton before and after the 2000 Senate election raised questions of whether the men's sentences were reduced in exchange for votes.

"The investigation was closed because we thoroughly investigated and determined it wasn't appropriate to bring charges against anybody in the case," Mr. Comey said at a news conference on an unrelated case. "I can't really go into it because it was an investigation that didn't result in charges. That may be a frustrating answer, but that's the one I'm compelled to give."

Mrs. Clinton, who had denied any improprieties, would not comment.

Mr. Clinton was quoted by The Associated Press as saying: "I'm certainly not surprised. There was never any reason to believe anybody had done anything wrong, even in the first place. So I'm not surprised. I think the facts speak for themselves."

A spokeswoman for Mr. Clinton said he would have no further comment.

In the investigation, Rockland County Democratic Party records were seized and politicians and community members testified before a grand jury. Prosecutors never disclosed what crime they suspected, but legal experts said possibilities included bribery or some kind of voter fraud.

The four New Square men were convicted in 1999 of bilking government aid programs and funneling the money back to the yeshiva in their community of 7,000 people, about 30 miles northwest of Manhattan. Mr. Clinton reduced by several months the federal prison terms of the men, Benjamin Berger, David Goldstein, Kalmen Stern and Jacob Elbaum. They were released from prison this year.

The mastermind of the scheme, Chaim Berger, 76, a founder of the village, was returned to the United States from Israel last summer. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced last month to six years in prison and ordered to pay more than $11 million in restitution.

Mrs. Clinton met with leaders of the community in August 2000 and again, with Mr. Clinton, in December 2000 after the election. New Square voters gave her 1,400 votes to 12 for the Republican candidate, former Representative Rick A. Lazio. Mrs. Clinton's aides have said clemency did not come up in the August meeting and, when it was raised in the December meeting, she offered no comment.

Rabbi Mayer Schiller, a spokesman for David Twersky, the spiritual leader of the village, said yesterday that the community was happy the investigation was over. "I think at this point it is best not to cast aspersions upon the intent of the entire investigation, and let us put this past us," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonscandals
Friday, June 21, 2002

Quote of the Day by Snuffington

1 posted on 06/20/2002 10:43:43 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I like the way the NYT spins this as no crime committed instead of just what the statement says no charges filed.
2 posted on 06/20/2002 10:53:46 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
My thoughts exactly.
3 posted on 06/20/2002 10:54:29 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Federal prosecutors must meet a certain evidentiary standard and have some likelihood of conviction,before bringing a case to trial. If the witnesses will not cooperate and continue to stonewall and have faulty memories,they are not going to be able to meet their burden of proof. Because they were not charged, does not mean that they were cleared.
4 posted on 06/20/2002 11:17:10 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Because they were not charged, does not mean that they were cleared.

And the New York Times darn well knows that, of course. The editors also know most people don't get much beyond the headlines.

5 posted on 06/20/2002 11:21:50 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
There was never any reason to believe anybody had done anything wrong, even in the first place.

Normal, innocent people do not speak this way.
Of course, BJ is neither. :)
Howdy, John!
6 posted on 06/20/2002 11:23:46 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Howdybackatya! =^)
7 posted on 06/20/2002 11:24:21 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Expect the usual suspects to be out and about tomorrow, crowing about the innocence of those two saints,Bill and Hillary. I was expressing my bewilderment tonight , to a lawyer friend ,about how it is, that these two always manage to escape. He believes that since both of them are lawyers, they know enough tricks to cover their tracks and make sure there is always a firewall between the deeds and themselves.
8 posted on 06/20/2002 11:29:12 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
One thing the despicable X42 couldn't escape: His impeachment.

Sure, an OJ Senate Jury gave him a pass, but the mark of being the first elected "president" charged with having commited High Crimes and Misdemeanors is indelible.

That's his legacy.

Moreover, while we're on the subject of 'firsts', bear in mind Clinton was the first sitting 'president' to be sanctioned by a federal judge for contempt of court.

9 posted on 06/20/2002 11:34:58 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Which is why I absolutely cannot understand how anyone would pay money to listen to this crook speak.
10 posted on 06/20/2002 11:47:22 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
I said it years ago,regarding the Clintons. That there should be a law , that no one Who holds a law lic or who has ever held one can be elected to Public office.

For the same reasons youre friend stated. That would stop a lot of the criminal activity in Washington over night.
11 posted on 06/20/2002 11:50:57 PM PDT by Royce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Neither can I, friend; neither can I.
12 posted on 06/21/2002 12:03:09 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Federal prosecutors said yesterday that no criminal wrongdoing was committed..."

Liars. Oh, I loathe the Clymers....

13 posted on 06/21/2002 7:34:36 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson