Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Charged with Stealing Genes From Harvard (Chinese national Jiangyu Zhu Kayoko Kimbara of Japan)
Reuters ^ | Wed Jun 19, 5:54 PM ET | By Christopher Noble

Posted on 06/19/2002 8:02:22 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian

Two Charged with Stealing Genes From Harvard

Wed Jun 19, 5:54 PM ET

By Christopher Noble

BOSTON (Reuters) - In a case shining a spotlight on the high-stakes world of academic medical research, police arrested two foreign-born scientists on Wednesday and accused them of trying to use genetic materials allegedly stolen from a Harvard Medical School ( news - web sites) lab to make and sell drugs.

Chinese national Jiangyu Zhu and Kayoko Kimbara of Japan were taken into custody in San Diego and charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy, theft of trade secrets and interstate transportation of stolen property, U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Michael Sullivan said.

The two researchers, both permanent residents of the United States working as postdoctoral fellows, allegedly stole genes that showed promise for use in halting organ rejection in transplant patients, according to a criminal complaint filed in federal court in Boston.

The complaint alleges Zhu, 30, and Kimbara, 32, took the materials, some of which are the subject of a patent application, when they quit Harvard for jobs at the University of Texas, even though they signed agreements forbidding them from doing so.

"Zhu and Kimbara took and conspired to take proprietary and highly marketable scientific information belonging to Harvard with them to Texas, with the intention of profiting from such information by collaborating with a Japanese company in the creation and sale of related and derivative products," the complaint read.

The two went so far as to mail several samples to the Japanese company, which produced antibodies for use in possible drugs and shipped them to Zhu in Texas, the complaint alleged.

The Japanese company was not named in the complaint. It cooperated with the investigation, which was continuing, the U.S. attorney said.

If convicted on all charges, the two face up to 25 years in prison and fines of up to $750,000. The two will be returned to Massachusetts to face the charges. Much of the allegedly stolen material has been returned to Harvard. The two were living in San Diego after leaving their jobs in Texas.

Harvard Medical School said it was cooperating with the investigation and referred questions to the U.S. attorney.

ISOLATED TWO GENES

Between 1997 and 1999, while working in the lab of Harvard cell biologist Dr. Frank McKeon, Zhu and Kimbara searched for immunosuppressive drugs that could help prevent the rejection of organ transplants. By early 1999, Zhu and Kimbara had isolated two genes with potential for treating diseases affecting the immune, cardiovascular and nervous systems.

About that time, the complaint alleges, Zhu and Kimbara began working overnight shifts without direct supervision from McKeon. In reviewing some of the results of their work, McKeon grew suspicious the two were hiding research.

"Dr. McKeon attempted to keep tabs on the work being performed by Zhu and Kimbara, but this was difficult given their unusual hours and their reluctance to have meaningful discussions with him," the complaint read.

McKeon confronted the two in late 1999 but they denied they were concealing any work from him and did not mention they intended to leave Harvard for the University of Texas, the complaint said. ,p.

Over the Christmas vacation in 1999, the two allegedly stole about 20 cartons from the Harvard lab and shipped them to Texas.

"Most of these boxes were removed in the very early morning hours or at night, in an apparent effort to effect the removal of the materials during odd hours over an extended holiday period," the complaint said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: harvard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2002 8:02:22 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Just a little scarey!!!!!!!!!
2 posted on 06/19/2002 9:15:57 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Typically Chinese.......steal everything that isn't nailed down.
3 posted on 06/19/2002 10:16:38 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
This is bogus. This is not a criminal case.

Something is messed up here.

They should not be arrested by police for this.

4 posted on 06/19/2002 10:36:40 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
Bootleg CD's, genetic material.. whats the difference?
5 posted on 06/19/2002 10:41:38 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Stealing Harvard's property is no longer a crime?
6 posted on 06/19/2002 10:44:48 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I still fail to understand how someone can steal a gene
7 posted on 06/19/2002 10:51:12 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
This is an IP dispute.

Lawyers and patents etc...

It is not right that they were arrested given the circumstances.

Something is fishy. And not a good turn of events to arrest scientist you have a dsipute with over rights.

8 posted on 06/19/2002 11:04:07 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Nothing comes between me and my Calvins!
9 posted on 06/19/2002 11:06:02 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy; ContentiousObjector
What part of "stole twenty cartons containing someone else's property" and/or "stole the intellectual property of someone/something else" do you two have the most dfficulty with?
10 posted on 06/20/2002 12:39:50 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
The only person who can realistically claim ownership of a gene is God,
11 posted on 06/20/2002 1:25:01 AM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Red cocain is now moving to our pharmacy industries via the gaping national security of universities which have huge jurisdictions over the lives and lives of the elites of this nation. This calls for some serious regulation.

Ironicaly they want to fight the war on drug but not up to there.
12 posted on 06/20/2002 1:26:34 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
You don't understand what this is about.
13 posted on 06/20/2002 8:04:46 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Trust me friend, this is not only an Intellectual Property issue. I see larceny (criminal), conversion (tort), breach of contract (civil), etc. If you pay me $250.00/hour, I'll find more.
14 posted on 06/20/2002 8:13:50 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
That's the problem. This is not a good development to arrest these two.

This will have chilling effects on acdemia and the biotech industry.

Not good at all to criminalize disputes.

15 posted on 06/20/2002 8:40:01 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
((must...resist...stop....myse lf....argh))

All your genes are belong to us!
16 posted on 06/20/2002 8:44:23 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
You don't understand what this is about.

1. I trust you addressed that remark at the nearest mirror;

2. I very well indeed "understand what this is about and;"

Have you suffered Psychopathological Projection Syndrome long -- or did you contract it for only this excercise?

Cordially -- B A

17 posted on 06/21/2002 3:54:08 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Brian, you have no idea what you are talking about and, whereas this is different than the usual topics I have seen you address, your consistency is your greatest virtue.

18 posted on 06/21/2002 8:35:12 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
And your point vis-a-vis the subject of the theft of physical and intellectual property being discussed here, is?

Or: why do you insist on coming only half armed to a battle of [Consistent] wits -- and [Consistently] measurable 180+ IQs?

19 posted on 06/22/2002 6:08:38 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ContentiousObjector
...........realistically claim ownership of a gene is God,

Bzzzzzzzzzt! Wrong.

The operative word here is 'realistically'. Please read the current rulings over the last couple of decades involving Intellectual Rights over the patenting of genetic material.

20 posted on 06/22/2002 6:18:07 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson