Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protest at Ottawa Citizen
Associated Press via Sun Media ^ | June 19, 2002 | Michael Kovrig

Posted on 06/19/2002 6:24:27 PM PDT by Clive

TORONTO (AP) -- Journalists at a prominent Canadian newspaper have launched a byline strike to protest the firing of the publisher, who says he was let go for defying the editorial policy of the media conglomerate that owns the daily.

The firing of Ottawa Citizen publisher Russell Mills by CanWest Global Communications -- the country's largest newspaper publisher and second largest private TV broadcaster -- earlier this week has raised concerns about concentration of media ownership and press freedom in Canada.

On Tuesday, articles and photos by members of the Ottawa Newspaper Guild began appearing in the Ottawa Citizen without the names of staffers.

CanWest Global declined to comment on Mills' departure. Mills has said he was fired for publishing an article that investigated Prime Minister Jean Chretien and an editorial that called for Chretien to resign.

Manitoba-based CanWest purchased 135-newspapers last year, including the Southam Inc. chain from Conrad Black's Hollinger Inc. They include 27 major dailies representing about 26 percent of the Canadian market.

Under Hollinger, some of Southam's major newspapers, including the flagship National Post, had a strong pro-business stance and often criticized Chretien's Liberal Party government.

CanWest is owned by Winnipeg's Asper family, known as longtime Liberal supporters. Since December, CanWest has barred its newspapers from running unsigned editorials that contradict the "core positions" of national editorials issued weekly from its headquarters.

Geoffrey Elliot, CanWest's vice president of corporate affairs, defended the policy of editorial control from headquarters.

CanWest newspapers are encouraged to run "the full spectrum of opinion" in signed editorials and opinion pieces, he said Monday.

"We don't expect the unsigned editorials, which reflect the position of the company, to be different from core values expressed in national editorials," Elliot said.

Critics, however, say the policy limits diversity of opinion in Canadian media.

"We are worried about what this means for the future of this newspaper's editorial independence and that of the entire Southam newspaper chain," the Ottawa Newspaper Guild said in a statement.

The Vienna-based International Press Institute said the Mills firing damaged press freedom in Canada, and opposition leaders called for an investigation of whether Chretien pressured CanWest to drop Mills and others over criticism of the Liberal Party government.

Opposition leaders suggested that Chretien met with Mills' boss, CanWest owner Izzy Asper, the same day the Citizen ran the editorial Mills' said got him fired. Liberal member of parliament John Bryden said Tuesday that he saw Asper talking with Chretien on June 1.

Deputy Prime Minister John Manley and the prime minister's office continued to deny on Wednesday that Chretien played any role in Mills' firing.

Mills, named editor of the Ottawa Citizen in 1977 and publisher in 1986, said CanWest asked him to retire quietly on Sunday, but he refused.

On Tuesday, columnist Gordon Gibson, a regular contributor to the National Post, said editors told him his submissions were no longer welcome after a recent column described Chretien as a "dead man walking."

Prior to Mills' firing, the CanWest policy inspired a byline strike at the Montreal Gazette, drew condemnation from former directors and owners, and led to the departure of at least two columnists from CanWest newspapers.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/19/2002 6:24:27 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive
When Rupert Murdoch bought the then-liberal New York Post, he was confronted by a posse of reporters who told him they didn't like his changes or editorial policy. "It's our paper, too," their spokesman whined.

Replied the great Rupert: "Bullsh**! It'll be your paper when you pay $28 million for it, like I just did."

A byline stike. Golly gosh, I guess that has management just shaking in their shoes. Scary stuff. Bet the readers are absolutely terrified, too. Fancy not knowing who wrote "Lost Dog of the Week."

The only good thing about bylines is that reporters accept them instead of higher wages. As a general rule, the only people who notice them are the reporters' doting mothers.

Incidentally, the best news organ in the world, The Economist, has never carried a byline on a story in its entire history.

2 posted on 06/19/2002 7:06:51 PM PDT by Big Bunyip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Bunyip
Good analogy, except that the Canadian liberals fired someone for criticizing, well, a liberal politician who complained.

Independent ideas must be supressed. The liberal command has spoken. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. All your bases are belong to us.
3 posted on 06/19/2002 7:36:14 PM PDT by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Didn't miss the point, Monroe. I'm aware of the liberal media establishment's perpetual bias and the irony of this particular circumstance. It's just that, as someone who has known quite a quite a few reporters over the years, I get really sick and tired of their preening, self-important sense of entitlement -- the byline strike being a typical example.
4 posted on 06/19/2002 8:07:53 PM PDT by Big Bunyip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive
So much for freedom of speech, we stopped buying The Citizen on Monday.
5 posted on 06/19/2002 8:08:00 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Bunyip
The trouble is, the Asper family also own a string of television stations, they require licence from the government, ergo the government has a weapon with which it keeps publishers in line....... it's wrong.
6 posted on 06/19/2002 8:13:33 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
I agree that it's wrong. The idea of a licence to say what you think is abhorent. But bad papers, ones that alienate their readers, pay the price sooner or later. Look at all the ones that have closed these past ten years in the U.S.

In the meantime, get your News off the Web.

Are Canadian networks undergoing the same ratings slide afflicting their U.S. counterparts? Those licenses may not be worth quite so much in years to come.

7 posted on 06/19/2002 10:23:02 PM PDT by Big Bunyip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
And the big chain is "under review" by the Competition Board... Wouldn't want to jeopardize anything there. What a setup we have!
8 posted on 06/20/2002 9:43:16 PM PDT by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Big Bunyip
Yes..... our networks are indeed in decline, people are relying more on the web for factual news, and it serves the networks right.

Our government owned network, is on the air only because it's tax payer funded, and the CBC has the worst rating of the bunch.

9 posted on 06/21/2002 7:02:04 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
And the big chain is "under review" by the Competition Board... Wouldn't want to jeopardize anything there. What a setup we have!

"Uneder review," what a joke, huh, thats the old tried and true method of taking something off the front burner, and hope people forget about it.

10 posted on 06/21/2002 7:05:25 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
And the big chain is "under review" by the Competition Board... Wouldn't want to jeopardize anything there. What a setup we have!

"Under review," what a joke, huh, thats the old tried and true method of taking something off the front burner, and hope people forget about it.

11 posted on 06/21/2002 7:05:59 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
So much for freedom of speech,

If I'm not mistaken, The People's Democratic Republic of Canada has BANNED Dr. laura from the air there. Didn't think Canada ever cared about free speech.

12 posted on 06/21/2002 7:13:23 AM PDT by agrandis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: agrandis
Noit was never banned.It on a local station weekdays 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM Dr. Laura.Of course they also have Art Bell.
13 posted on 06/22/2002 9:01:34 AM PDT by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson