Replies

Is our war against the Islamic fanatics is really a sex driven war?
From the beginning of time the human animal addressed the basic biological need for sex, in a way much similar to animals. The men need sex basically for its pleasure, and the women need it mostly for propagating the human race. Thus men looked at women as a sex object? And women looked at men for protection/commitment.

Since then, civilization and religions imposed different rules on the human animal, and sexuality. We cannot walk around naked, men cannot have as many wives as they want, men cannot beat the women if they refused to have sex with them, men cannot throw out women who become unattractive/old/back-talkers without paying dearly!......The problem with this picture is as the world civilization imposed artificial restriction on the male animal, the Islamic religion kept most of the animal privileges of the cave men to its followers. Islam was invented by a man, and to assure its propagation, it catered to men.

At this point, Moslems who live in Moslem countries do not care how the rest of the world behaves. That is simply because most of these countries are still protecting the rights of the men to abuse women. However, there are two problems, first the Moslem men who visit the west are terrified from the amount of freedom our females have, and second, the new global village and the dominance of the Hollywood movies and American culture assures these backward people that there is no place to run or to hide from the new way of life, where women have equality. They fear the potential of revolts from their female population, and a continuous degradation of their rights to use and abuse women.

No. The drive is to force everyone on planet earth into one little box. Rules about how long a man's beard must be and public checks on whether armpit hair is shaven show this.

We believe all men are equal, they believe all men must be alike. They must all pray at the same time, they must dress the same way, they must eat the same way and the same kinds of foods. They must even all think alike with any disagreement or different kind of thought being punished by death.

There is a professor in Pakistan who is under a sentence of death. His crime was to say that maybe Mohammed’s parents went Muslims because they were dead before Mohammed got his revelation. Now that is logical. Sort of like saying that Ezekiel or Moses couldn't have been Christian as they were dead before Christ came.

But to say this apparently is considered blasphemy under Islamic law.

You are missing the bigger picture. It really is all about freedom.

a.cricket