Skip to comments.
Airlines under fire for making large passengers buy two tickets
Associated Press ^
| 6-19-02
| DAVID KOENIG, AP Business Writer
Posted on 06/19/2002 2:24:29 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
DALLAS (AP) --
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: airlines; fatties; large; obese; passengers; peopleofsize; southwest; tickets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: da_toolman
ping
To: Oldeconomybuyer
All it will take is one typo for this to get really ugly.
SW Airlines requires "phat" passengers to buy second ticket.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
FAT TASK CORPS FILES LARGE FLIGHT SUIT
Well, the obese are sure not smiling.
Airlines will charge them more for flying.
Skinny people dont pay less!
Tall people cannot compress!
Its a case of spatial profiling!!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Southwest said its double-ticket policy on obese passengers was prompted by complaints from other travelersI've been on a full flight, in the window seat of a three seat side, in 95 degree weather, sitting on a runway for 45 minutes with a 450 lb'er in the middle seat, it isn't pleasant. Good for Southwest!
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66
To: Boonie Rat
Been there, done that and it ain't pretty!
To: Boonie Rat
I was once in a middle seat between a 300 pound man and a 300 pound woman. 4 hours of hell. When the plane landed and we all stood up the two tubs of lard started talking to each other.
The bastards arranged the seating on purpose for their own comfort and ruined my trip. If I had done what I was thinking I would be typing this from a prison cell. I also didn't want to be the filling in a lard sandwich.
7
posted on
06/19/2002 2:41:01 PM PDT
by
sakic
To: Oldeconomybuyer
>Airlines under fire for making large passengers buy two tickets
Well, if fat people have have to pay two fares, does this mean that if I fly with Kate Moss and she squeezes into my seat that we need only pay one fare?! |
|
-- KotS
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Ticket agents can "make a judgment call" and ask an obese person whether he or she usually takes up more than one seat..." I wonder whether said "agents" will enjoy the "judgment calls" that awaits them as co-defendants in a legal action based largely on the vagueness of the basis of their determinations as to what constitutes "taking up more than one seat"....
9
posted on
06/19/2002 2:45:23 PM PDT
by
tracer
To: KissOfTheSith
If those eyes were any wider apart they'd be in her ears.
10
posted on
06/19/2002 2:45:42 PM PDT
by
sakic
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Well, sounds good to me. But, I also have to say, make the seats wider.....it is very uncomfortable in those tiny seats. If they did that they would be the most popular airline and get more money, but no airline seems to get that.....
To: rwfromkansas
Less seats = Less revenue
12
posted on
06/19/2002 2:50:11 PM PDT
by
sakic
To: Oldeconomybuyer
When the spokespeople for the lardasses (er, excuse me, I should have said gravitationally challenged) say the airlines should provide larger seats, what they are really saying is they should raise the price of tickets for everybody. Like all "activists," they ignore the tradeoffs. There is no free lunch. Now I wouldn't mind paying 20% more for a 20% bigger seat, but a lot of people would, or could not afford it. Why should others bear the expense of the lardasses? No, asking them to pay for two seats concentrates the cost just where it belongs - on "persons of avoirdupois."
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"It's just discriminatory and it's mean-spirited," said Morgan Downey, executive director of the American Obesity Association. "This is singling out a group that's been very heavily stigmatized rather than making some accommodations in their cabins."Hey Larda**, here's an idea...why not LOSE SOME WEIGHT!?! Sheesh...
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
14
posted on
06/19/2002 2:51:53 PM PDT
by
wku man
To: sakic
>If those eyes were any wider apart they'd be in her ears. Eyes?! Oh, yes, now that you mention it, she does have eyes... [grins] And, now that I look at them, they do seem to be wide-set. I wonder if that means anything...
-- KotS
To: Boonie Rat
I've been on a full flight, in the window seat of a three seat side, in 95 degree weather, sitting on a runway for 45 minutes with a 450 lb'er in the middle seat, it isn't pleasant. Good for Southwest! I was in some sardine can like an MD80 for six hours. Next to me was an enormous person. When we started, I was burning up, because a Standard Passenger is, what, 185#. We both paid the same for the ticket. The turbines do not care if a pound is meat, metal, or underwear; Each pound costs the same to fly.
After a few hours, however, I found myself feeling sorry for this person. Granted, I had a miserable flight, with parts of a passenger spilling over onto me and my seat, but one can be assured this person was having a far more miserable time than I was, in the kindergarten seats the airline had packed in.
And in compassion, I realized that in a few hours I would be off the plane:
Scold: "Mr.Churchill, you are DRUNK!"
Sir Winston: "Yes, madame, and you are UGLY. Tomorrow I shall be sober."
Likewise, soon, I would be uncrowded; My seatmate was going where? Into the back of a too-small cab?
Hey, I am not a centerfold anymore, either, so....
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Advocates for the obese are outraged. Here's the violin. You consume it, you pay for it. I suppose they aren't outraged when the obese spill over onto the person next to them.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
6'2", 225 pounds, and by the new "standards" from our concerned health industry, now classified as obese.
I gotta say that the 18" seat is not exactly roomy, and I think I am not exactly monstrous in size. They probably do need to think about making the seats a little bigger.
18
posted on
06/19/2002 3:02:51 PM PDT
by
AzSteven
To: KissOfTheSith
I guess I'd be willing to overlook the eyes.
19
posted on
06/19/2002 3:06:20 PM PDT
by
sakic
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Upon hearing the news, Teddy Kennedy and Jerrold Nadler were NOT happy."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson