Posted on 06/19/2002 12:10:49 PM PDT by gordgekko
Then I guess you will just have to live with Abortion-on-demand then. If you can't differentuate between a doctor knowingly killing a baby and a pill that might prevent a pregnancy, we will just have to live with the status quo.
They already do. That is the abortion lobby's Achilles heel. No matter how strident they are about "the woman's right", they have this nagging feeling which they cannot admit having, that they are committing murder.
It's ironic that an abortion, supposedly performed to secure the health of the mother, particularly her mental well-being, actually destroys it because the abortion culture disallows her attempt to face the reality of what has happened. Instead, they demand that she buy into the collective lie, and become "twofold more the child of hell than themselves."
That way madness lies....
When you kill a being inside your tummy, it has a different genetic code that your own, the DNA is unique, you have committed murder.
To prevent this, keep your legs shut until you are married, and make sure you marry a man who will stick around.
Why do you keep posting this lie. This was a poorly designed study not showing what you claim it does. In fact the Melbye (Danish) study found exactly the opposite, but did not put that information in their conclusions.
"Gee, I love that kinda talk."
Very well put.
All the Best to You and Yours.
So make the rapist pay. Confiscate all his assets, and lock him in prison for the rest of his life to do hard labor with the money going to support the victims.
It's extreme to try and defend the lives of innocent murder victims now?
Is giving birth to a rapist's baby more painful than giving birth to another kind of baby? Or are you talking about psychological pain. That can be dealt with by helping the mother not to transfer blame. Additionally, many victims of rape who have aborted their babies tell of the guilt of adding the crime of murder to the crime of rape. Aborting the baby does nothing to unrape the woman, it just compounds the crime.
Not only are you forcing her to give him a child, you're forcing her to pay out of her wallet for 18+ years for his evil.
I think you're forgetting who the rapist is.
I have a better idea. Why don't people like you register your names with the government saying you support making women give birth to than who raped them's baby. Then the government when the government completely outlaws abortion it can sieze all of your assets and levy a 100% income tax on you to pay for the cost of supporting rape victims who are legally forced to have the baby.
There are plenty of people who would adopt the child and I may already be listed as one of them. Since you have no idea, please take your fatuous arrogance elsewhere.
If you are going to demand that they have the child, you have to help them pay for it.
Once again, you seem to be forgetting who the rapist is.
Shalom.
I intuited the smiley (. . .but I wasn't 100% sure).
Grace and peace.
They have this new thing, it's called "adoption."
SD
There are obvious signs of someone who is repeating propaganda rather than thinking independently.
The big key in that post was the fact that someone else raped the woman, but by making abortion illegal I would be forcing her to carry a baby. The rapist would be forcing her to carry a baby. I would not be forcing her to take any action whatsoever. I would just be stopping her from taking the morally repugnant action of killing a child who never raped anyone.
But such twists of logic are the standard MO of the left.
Shalom.
You have no right to tell her that she has to have that baby. It's not her child unless she chooses it to be because it was forced on her.
I think you're forgetting who the rapist is
I am well aware of who the rapist is.
Interesting police state you want to set up.
Anyone in favor if its abolition would be required by law to adopt any kid the state puts at their doorstep. If you refuse you are either fined or sent to prison.
Do you honestly think this is a deterrent? Putting aside the "individual" list, there are certainly groups of people who would be happy to take any baby. I call your bluff and repeat the words of Mother Theresa: "If you don't want them, give the babies to me."
If you are going to burden society with your opinion you should have to pay dearly out of your pocket for it.
People are such a burden aren't they?
SD
I'm not telling her she has to have that baby. I'm simply telling her she may not murder it. I certainly have the right to proscribe murder by law.
It's not her child unless she chooses it to be because it was forced on her.
This is one of the stupidest things I have ever read, and that's saying a lot. First of all, we don't own people. When we say a child is "mine" we mean "my responsibility" not "my property." Responsibilities often have nothing to do with our choices. Circumstances often thrust them upon us.
There is no right, implicit or explicit, for a mother to kill her child except in self-defense. None.
I am well aware of who the rapist is
Then quit trying to blame me for what the rapist is forcing the woman to do.
All I am doing is protecting the baby from being murdered, no matter what excuse the murderer is offering.
Shalom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.