Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Warns of Risks Using Internet
Associated Press / ABC ^

Posted on 06/19/2002 7:28:45 AM PDT by RCW2001

Group Warns of Risks Using Internet
Cybersecurity Experts Warn of Risks Involved With Logging on to Internet

The Associated Press

A T L A N T A, June 19 — At a town hall meeting on cyber security, experts warned that the risks of going online have become especially prevalent as hackers find new ways to poke holes in Internet security systems.

Tom Noonan, chief executive officer for Internet Security Systems, told the gathering Tuesday that logging onto the Internet is like entering a dangerous neighborhood. Risks include identity fraud and intellectual property and credit card theft.

"This is the first national security threat the government can't handle alone," said Noonan, one of five panelists in the meeting on the national strategy to secure the online infrastructure.

The meeting was the fourth in a series of nationwide meetings hosted by the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board, formed in October to address web-related vulnerabilities within the federal government and the private sector. More than 25 national security officials are on the board.

"The critical infrastructure of this country may be the most vulnerable to cyber attack," said former Sen. Sam Nunn, a panelist. "This is a rather unique security challenge. There are no borders in cyberspace."

Howard Schmidt, vice chairman of the board and a panelist, emphasized the importance of providing education and training for mid-career professionals. He said only eight people received Ph.D.s last year in Internet security.

While most universities offer computer science degrees, they seldom have programs focused on Internet security, said Player Pate, spokesman for Atlanta-based Internet Security Systems.

Pate said many people don't know that when they log onto the Internet, they're open to attack even if they have anti-virus protection and a firewall. He recommends an anti-intrusion device.

"You're connecting to the Internet this pipeline," Pate said. "That is what attackers look for."

The panelists agreed that fighting cyberterrorism requires large corporations, the government, international governments, small businesses and consumers to work together.

"Waiting for disaster to happen is not a strategy," Nunn said.

On the Net:

National Security Council: http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc

Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office: http://www.ciao.gov

Stay Safe Online: http://www.staysafeonline.info



TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/19/2002 7:28:45 AM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
What is the difference between a firewall and an anti-intrusion device?
2 posted on 06/19/2002 7:37:14 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
What is the difference between a firewall and an anti-intrusion device?

I believe they mean a software firewall in this article, as opposed to a physical one (anti-intrusion device -- such as this one). ZoneAlarm is a software firewall, for example.

3 posted on 06/19/2002 7:41:21 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
One of the newer Linksys devices (BEFSR41)runs about $90.00 and will do most everything you need. Using it with something like Wallwatcher for logging is a pretty good solution for the $$$$.
4 posted on 06/19/2002 7:50:00 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Second the thought. Mine is a DHCP server and a nice little switch, and does address translation so the guys doing the portscans don't find you a walkover. Personally I suspect adding ZoneAlarm to this (which I also own, from before I bought the LinkSys) is a bit of overkill - I took it off after a couple of weeks with no hits. But YMMV...
5 posted on 06/19/2002 7:53:33 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
What is the difference between a firewall and an anti-intrusion device?

A firewall is a device which actively blocks connections according to a user-defined rule set.

An Intrusion Dectection System is passive, it listens and reports on any suspicious events.

Some newer systems attempt to combine these functions, so say your IDS sees a DoS attack coming in, it can re-write for firewall rules to block it.

6 posted on 06/19/2002 8:06:18 AM PDT by Lorenb420
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
If you want to log in/out traffic data see here. Cool program and it will work with a lot of traffic. It's free and it really works well. Easy to setup.

This, along with a packet sniffer/logger like Commview do a good job. When using Windoze.

7 posted on 06/19/2002 8:14:13 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Pate said many people don't know that when they log onto the Internet, they're open to attack even if they have anti-virus protection and a firewall. He recommends an anti-intrusion device.

I just realized most of the people quoted in this article work at ISS, which just happens to own BlackICE, a popular personal firewall.

No conflict of interest here.

8 posted on 06/19/2002 8:14:37 AM PDT by Lorenb420
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson